An Isometric Predictor for Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift for Chinese Men

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the practicality of the modified isometric strength tests to predict the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) of Chinese men. The modified strength tests allow the participant to pull on the load cell in front of the body and to apply force in a functional free posture. Both the modified and the standard strength data of each participant were used as predictors for the MAWLs. The prediction models were constructed and evaluated under task conditions of two lifting ranges, two box sizes, and three lifting frequencies. To realize the effect of modifications, testing posture was recorded and the joint angles were calculated. A stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that modified composite strength (MCS), chest circumference, and acromial height accounted for 86% to 91% of the variance. Because the strength of the upper extremity body was also recruited in the test, the weak upper extremity strength of the Chinese participants would therefore be better reflected. Evidence for the existence of a close match between MAWL and MCS values, as well as the task conditions for its existence, suggest that a simple isometric strength measure is a good predictor for the MAWL.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, D. M. (1974). The relationship between variable selection and data augmentation and a method for prediction. Technometrics, 16, 125–127.

Ayoub, M. M. (1992). Problems and solution in materials handling; The state of the art. Ergonomics. 35, 713–728.

Ayoub, M. M. , Bethea. N, J. , Deivanayagam, S. , Asfour, S. S. , Bakken, G. M. , Liles, D. , Mital, A. , & Sherif, M. (1978). Determination and modeling of lifting capacity (Final Report, HEW (NIOSH) Grant No. 5R010H-00545-02). Cincinnati, OH; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Ciriello, V. M. , & Snook, S. H. (1983). The study of sizes, distance, height, and frequency effect on manual handling task. Human Factors, 25, 473–483.

Daams, B. J. (1993). Static force exertion in postures with different degrees of freedom. Ergonomics, 36, 397–406.

Garg, A. , Mital, A. , & Asfour, S. S. (1980). A comparison of isometric strength and dynamic lifting capability. Ergonomics, 23, 13–27.

Garg, A. , & Saxena, U. (1979). Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 40, 849–903.

Genaidy, A. M. , Asfour, S. S. , Mital, A. , & Tritar, M. (1988). Psychophysical capacity modeling in frequent manual material handling activities. Human Factors, 30, 319–337.

Jiang, B. C. (1984). Psychophysical capacity modeling of individual and combined manual materials handling activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.

10.

Jiang, B. C. , Smith, J, L. , & Ayoub, M. M. (1986). Psychophysical modeling of manual materials-handling capacities using isoinertial strength variables. Human Factors, 28, 691–702.

11.

Kerlingcr, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

12.

Khalil, T. M. , Waly, S. M. , Genaidy, A. M. , & Asfour, S. S. (1987). Determination of lifting abilities; A comparative study of four techniques. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 48, 951–956.

13.

Lee, Y. H. , Wu, S. P. , & Hsu, S. H. (1995). The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects. Ergonomics, 38, 671–683.

14.

Mital, A. , & Ayoub, M. M. (1980). Modeling of isometric strength and lifting capacity. Human Factors, 22, 285–290.

15.

Mital, A. , Garg, A. , Karwowski, W. , Kumar, S. , Smith, J. L. , & Ayoub, M. M. (1993). Status in human strength research and application. IIE Transactions, 25, 57–69.

16.

Snook, S. H. (1978). The design of manual handling tasks. Ergonomics, 21, 963–985.

17.

Snook, S. H. , & Ciriello, V. M. (1991). The design of manual handling tasks; Revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics, 34, 1197–1820.

18.

Yates, J. W. , Kamon, E. , Rodgers, S. H. , & Champney, P. C. (1980), Static lifting strength and maximal isometric voluntary contractions of back, arm and shoulder muscles. Ergonomics, 23, 37–47.

19.

Zhu, Z. , & Zhang, Z. (1990). Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects. Ergonomics, 33, 875–884.