Observer Sensitivity to Element Reliability in a Multielement Visual Display

Abstract

This study tested whether selected visual display conditions can aid observers in prioritizing information from display elements that differ in reliability. The observer's task was to decide whether the information conveyed by an array of nine graphical elements represented a signal or noise input. The value displayed by each element was an independent sample from the signal or noise distribution. The reliability of a display element was manipulated by controlling the variance of these distributions (high reliability = low variance). Observers tended to weight high-reliability sources slightly more than low-reliability sources. The observers-detection performance and weighting efficiency were highest when the reliability of the source was cued by the luminance of the display element. Thus observers can prioritize visual information sources based on statistical properties such as variability if luminance cues are available during the presentation of the information.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berg, B. G. (1989). Analysis of weights in multiple observation tasks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1743–1746.

Berg, B. G. (1990). Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 149–158.

Berg, B. C , & Green, D. M. (1990). Spectral weights in profile listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 758–766.

Christ, R. E. (1990). Review and analysis of color coding research for visual display. In M. Venturino (Ed.), Selected readings in human factors (pp. 89–117. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Durlach, N. I. , Braida, L. D. , & Ito, Y. (1986). Toward a model for discrimination of broadband signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 63–72.

Fisher, D. L. , & Tan, K. C. (1989). Visual displays: The highlighting paradox. Human Factors, 31, 17–30.

Green, D. M. , & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory.. New York: Wiley.

Ohba, R. (1992). Intelligent sensor technology. New York: Wiley.

Posner, M. I. , Snyder, C. R. R. , & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.

10.

Schum, D. A. (1975). The weighting of testimony in judicial proceedings from sources having reduced credibility. Human Factors, 17, 172–203.

11.

Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Teleoperation, telerobotics, and telepresence: A progress report. In H. G. Stassen (Ed.), Analysis, design and evaluation of man-machine systems (pp. 1–8. New York: Pergamon.

12.

Sorkin, R. D. , Mabry, T. R. , Weldon, M. S. , & Elvers, G. C. (1991). Integration of information from multiple element displays. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 167–187.

13.

Van Orden, K. F. , Divita, J. , & Shim, M. J. (1993). Redundant use of luminance and flashing with shape and color as highlighting codes in symbolic display. Human Factors, 35, 195–204.

14.

Wickens, C. D. (1984). Engineering psychology and human performance.. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

15.

Wickens, C. D. , & Andre, A. D. (1990). Proximity compatibility and information display: Effects of color, space, and objectness on information integration. Human Factors, 32, 61–77.