Lasers commonly used in industry and the military are increasingly being recognized as possible hazards to vision and visually guided tasks. This study examined the effects of laser-induced visual loss on target acquisition performance. An argon laser was used to produce a temporary central scotoma. Observers searched for variable-contrast aircraft that were embedded in backgrounds of differing complexity. The laser exposures increased acquisition times 2 to 12 times over baseline levels, indicating that the degree of visual deficit was task dependent. Acquisition time increased as background complexity increased and target contrast decreased. However, target motion facilitated acquisition performance and mitigated the laser effect. Although contrast had a systematic effect on acquisition performance, it was clear that factors other than contrast contributed to target visibility. Other factors that may have affected visibility included distractors and masking effects introduced by the structured backgrounds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, A. J., Haegerstrom-Portnoy, G., and Brown, B. (1979). Night vision performance in detection and identification of moving targets after glare: Final report. Frederick, MD: U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, Fort Detrick.
2.
Akerman, A., III, and Kinzly, R. E. (1979). Predicting aircraft detectability. Human Factors, 21, 277–291.
3.
American National Standards Institute. (1986). American national standard for the safe use of lasers (Z136.1). New York: Author.
4.
American National Standards Institute. (1993). American national standard for the safe use of lasers (Z136.1). New York: Author.
5.
Anderberg, B., Sjolund, B., Bolander, G., Steinvall, O., and Tengroth, B. (1989). Vulnerability of the retina to injury from a military ruby rangefinder at battlefield distances. Health Physics, 5, 743–748.
6.
Barlow, H. B. (1972). Dark and light adaptation: Psychophysics. In D. Jameson and L. M. Hurvich (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology: VII14. Visual psychophysics (pp. 1–28). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
Bertera, J. H. (1988). The effect of simulated scotomas on visual search in normal subjects. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 29, 470–475.
8.
Blankenstein, M. F., Zuclich, J., Allen, R. G., Davis, H., Thomas, S. J., and Harrison, R. F. (1986). Retinal hemorrhage thresholds for Q-switched Neodymium-YAG laser exposures. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 27, 1176–1179.
9.
Bloomfield, J. R. (1972). Visual search in complex fields: Size differences between target disc and surrounding discs. Human Factors, 14, 139–148.
10.
Brown, J. L. (1965). Flash blindness. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 60, 505–520.
11.
D'Andrea, J. A., and Knepton, J. C. (1989). Effect of laser glare and aircraft windscreen on visual search performance under low ambient lighting (NAMRL-1350). Pensacola, FL: U.S. Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
12.
Davies, E. B. (1968). Visual theory in target acquisition. In AGARD Conference Proceedings, No. 41 (A1-1-13) London: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
13.
Engel, F. L. (1977). Visual conspicuity, visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye. Vision Research, 17, 95–108.
14.
Finkelstein, J. M., and Schafer, R. E. (1971). Improved goodness of fit tests. Biometrika, 58, 641–645.
15.
Green, R. P., Cartledge, R. M., Cheney, F. E., and Menendez, A. R. (1988). Medical management of combat laser eye injuries (USAFSAM-TR-88-21). Brooks AFB, TX: U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine.
16.
Greening, C. P. (1976). Mathematical modeling of air-to-ground target acquisition. Human Factors, 18, 111–148.
17.
Harvey, L. O., Jr. (1986). Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 623–632.
18.
Hinton, J. L. (1985). The use of afterimages in the simulation of scotoma effects on visual performance (Report JS 10307). Sowerby, UK: British Aerospace, Sowerby Research Centre.
19.
Hinton, J. L., and Cooke, K. J. (1985). The effect of an artificial scotoma on simple visual task performance (Report JS 305). Sowerby, UK: British Aerospace, Sowerby Research Centre.
20.
Hood, D. C., and Finkelstein, M. A. (1986). Sensitivity to light. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. I. Sensory processes and perception (Ch. 5, pp 1–66). New York: Wiley.
21.
Kelly, D. H. (1979). Motion and vision: II. Stabilized spatiotemporal threshold surface. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 69, 1340–1349.
22.
Kosnik, W. D., Kline, D., Fikre, J., and Sekuler, R. (1987). Ocular fixation control as a function of age and exposure duration. Psychology and Aging, 2, 302–305.
23.
Kosnik, W. D., and Rhodes, J. W. (1990, October). Visual recovery of flickering targets after an intense adapting light flash. Poster presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Orlando, FL.
24.
Krendel, E. S., and Wodinsky, J. (1960). Search in an unstructured visual field. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 50, 562–568.
25.
Labo, J. A., Menendez, A. R., Allen, R. G., Edmonds, B. P., and Turner, M. D. (1990). Outdoor measures of laser veiling glare effects on the visual field: A preliminary study (USAFSAM-TR-90-9). Brooks AFB, TX: U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine.
26.
Lilliefors, H. W. (1967). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 399–402.
27.
Los Angeles Times. (1981, October 29).
28.
Mann, N. R., Scheuer, E. M., and Fertig, K. W. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the two parameter Weibull or extreme value distribution with unknown parameters. Communications in Statistics, 2, 383–400.
29.
McLeod, P., Driver, J., Dienes, Z., and Crisp, J. (1991). Filtering by movement in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 55–64.
30.
Menendez, A. R., and Garcia, P. V. (1985). Human psychophysics—Contrast sensitivity measures of flashblindness, Part IV. In Effects of laser radiation on the eye (Vol. IV, pp. 73–98, USAFSAM-TR-85-13). Brooks AFB, TX: U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine.
31.
Menendez, A. R., and Smith, P. A. (1990). Model for predicting the effects of laser exposures and eye protection on vision. In Laser Safety, Eyesafe Laser Systems, and Laser Eye Protection, SPIE Proceedings, 1207 (pp. 21–33). Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
32.
Moulden, B., Kingdom, F., and Gatley, L. F. (1990). The standard deviation of luminance as a metric for contrast in random-dot images. Perception, 19, 79–101.
33.
Murphy, K. St. J., and Foley-Fisher, J. A. (1988). Visual search with non-foveal vision. Ophthalmology and Physiological Optics, 8, 345–348.
34.
Murphy, K. St. J., and Foley-Fisher, J. A. (1989). Effect of a scotoma on eye movements during visual search. Ophthalmology and Physiological Optics, 9, 317–321.
35.
Overington, I. (1982). Towards a complete model of photopic visual threshold performance. Optical Engineering, 21, 2–13.
36.
Pavel, M., Sperling, G., Riedl, T., and Vanderbeek, A. (1987). Limits of visual communications: The effect of signal-to-noise ratio on the intelligibility of American Sign Language. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 2355–2365.
37.
Peli, E. (1990). Contrast in complex images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7, 2032–2040.
38.
Petersen, H. E., and Dugas, D. J. (1972). The relative importance of contrast and motion in visual detection. Human Factors, 14, 207–216.
39.
Previc, F. H., Blankenstein, M. F., Coffey, D. J., and Garcia, P. V. (1985). Visual evoked potential correlates of flashblindness in monkeys and humans, Part III. In Effects of laser radiation on the eye: Volume IV (USAFSAM-TR-85-13). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.
40.
Previc, F. H., Blankenstein, M. F., Garcia, P. V., and Allen, R. G. (1985). Visual evoked potential correlates of laser flashblindness in rhesus monkeys: I. Argon laser flashes. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 62, 309–321.
41.
Reddix, M. D., DeVietti, T. L., Knepton, J. C., and D'Andrea, J. A. (1990). The effect of three levels of laser glare on the speed and accuracy of target location performance when viewing a briefly presented visual array (NAMRL-1359). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
42.
Rhodes, J. W., Garcia, P. V., and Cosgrove, D. J. (1989). Behavioral measurement of laser flashblindness in rhesus monkeys. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 60, 34–39.
43.
Rogers, J. G. (1972). Peripheral contrast thresholds for moving images. Human Factors, 14, 199–205.
44.
Schmeisser, E. T. (1987). Laser flash effects on chromatic discrimination in monkeys (USAFSAM-TR-87-17). Brooks AFB, TX: U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine.
45.
Sekuler, R., Pantle, A., and Levinson, E. (1978). Physiological basis of motion perception. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H.-L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology: Volume III. Perception (pp. 67–96). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46.
Sheehy, J. B. (1989). Dazzling glare: Protection criteria versus visual performance (NADC-89076-60). Warminster, PA: Naval Air Development Center.
47.
Sliney, D. H., and Wolbarsht, M. W. (1980). Safety with lasers and other optical sources. New York: Plenum.
48.
Varner, D. C., Cartledge, R. M., Elliott, W. R., III, Menendez, A. R., Carrier, R., and Richter, M. J. (1988). Wavelength-dependent and independent effects of veiling glare on the visibility of head-up display (HUD) symbology (USAFSAM-TR-88-15). Brooks AFB, TX: U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine.
49.
Westheimer, G. (1966). The Maxwellian view. Vision Research, 6, 669–682.
50.
Williams, L. G. (1966). Target conspicuity and visual search. Human Factors, 8, 80–92.
