This paper presents a theoretical model of situation awareness based on its role in dynamic human decision making in a variety of domains. Situation awareness is presented as a predominant concern in system operation, based on a descriptive view of decision making. The relationship between situation awareness and numerous individual and environmental factors is explored. Among these factors, attention and working memory are presented as critical factors limiting operators from acquiring and interpreting information from the environment to form situation awareness, and mental models and goal-directed behavior are hypothesized as important mechanisms for overcoming these limits. The impact of design features, workload, stress, system complexity, and automation on operator situation awareness is addressed, and a taxonomy of errors in situation awareness is introduced, based on the model presented. The model is used to generate design implications for enhancing operator situation awareness and future directions for situation awareness research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amalberti, R., and Deblon, F. (1992). Cognitive modeling of fighter aircraft process control: A step towards an intelligent on-board assistance system. International Journal of Man-Machine Systems,36, 639–671.
2.
Ashby, F. G., and Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,14, 33–53.
3.
Bacon, S. J. (1974). Arousal and the range of cue utilization. Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 81–87.
4.
Baddeley, A. D. (1972). Selective attention and performance in dangerous environments. British Journal of Psychology,63, 537–546.
5.
Barber, P. J., and Folkard, S. (1972). Reaction time under stimulus uncertainty with response certainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 138–142.
6.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology.. London: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bartlett, F. C. (1943). Fatigue following highly skilled work. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B),131, 147–257.
8.
Bettman, J. R., and Kakkar, P. (1977). Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. Journal of Consumer Research,3, 233–240.
9.
Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., Rabinowitz, J. C., Francolin, C. M., and Plude, D. (1981). Detecting the unexpected in photo interpretation. Human Factors,23, 153–163.
10.
Billings, C. E. (1991). Human-centered aircraft automation: A concept and guidelines (NASA Technical Memorandum 103885). Moffet Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
11.
Bowers, K. S. (1991). Knowing more than we can say leads to saying more than we can know: On being implicitly informed. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 179–194. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Braune, R. J., and Trollip, S. R. (1982). Towards an internal model in pilot training. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine,53, 996–999.
13.
Broadbent, D. E. (1954). Some effects of noise on visual performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,6, 1–5.
14.
Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress.. London: Academic.
15.
Callaway, E., III, and Dembo, D. (1958). Narrowed attention: A psychological phenomenon that accompanies a certain physiological change. AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry,79, 74–90.
16.
Carmino, A., Idee, E., Larchier Boulanger, J., and Morlat, G. (1988). Representational errors: Why some may be termed diabolical. In L. P. Goodstein, H. B. Anderson, and S. E. Olsen, (Eds.), Tasks, errors and mental models (pp. 240–250. London: Taylor & Francis.
17.
Carmody, M. A., and Gluckman, J. P. (1993). Task-specific effects of automation and automation failure on performance, workload and situational awareness. In R. S. Jensen and D. Neumeister, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 167–171. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.
18.
Casson, R. W. (1983). Schema in cognitive anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology,12, 429–462.
19.
Cohen, M. S. (1993). Metacognitive strategies in support of recognition. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 1102–1106). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
20.
Damos, D., and Wickens, C. D. (1980). The acquisition and transfer of time-sharing skills. Acta Psychologica,6, 569–577.
21.
Davis, D. R. (1948). Pilot error.. London: HMSO, Great Britain Air Ministry.
22.
Davis, E. T., Kramer, P., and Graham, N. (1983). Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual pattems. Perception and Psychophysics,5, 341–346.
23.
deGroot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess.. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
24.
Dreyfus, S. E. (1981). Formal models vs. human situational understanding: Inherent limitations on the modeling of business expertise (ORC 81–3). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Operations Research Center.
25.
Endsley, M. R. (1987a). The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 1388–1392). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
26.
Endsley, M. R. (1987b). SAGAT: A methodology for the measurement of situation awareness (NOR DOC 87–83). Hawthorne, CA: Northrop Corp.
27.
Endsley, M. R. (1988a). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
28.
Endsley, M. R. (1988b). Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT). In Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (pp. 789–795). New York: IEEE.
29.
Endsley, M. R. (1989a). Final report: Situation awareness in an advanced strategic mission (NOR DOC 89–32). Hawthorne, CA: Northrop Corp.
30.
Endsley, M. R. (1989b). Pilot situation awareness: The challenge for the training community. In Proceedings of the Interservice/lndustry Training Systems Conference (pp. 111–117). Ft Worth, TX: American Defense Preparedness Association.
31.
Endsley, M. R. (1990a, March). Objective evaluation of situation awareness for dynamic decision makers in teleoperations.Presented at the Engineering Foundation Conference on Human-Machine Interfaces for Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Santa Barbara, CA.
32.
Endsley, M. R. (1990b). Predictive utility of an objective measure of situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 41–45). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
33.
Endsley, M. R. (1990c). Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory and measurement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
34.
Endsley, M. R. (1993a). Situation awareness and workload: Flip sides of the same coin. In R. S. Jensen and D. Neumeister, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 906–911. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Aviation
35.
Endsley, M. R. (1993b, February). Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory.Presented at the First International Conference on Situational Awareness in Complex Systems, Orlando, FL.
36.
Endsley, M. R. (1993c). A survey of situation awareness requirements in air-to-air combat fighters. International Journal of Aviation Psychology,3, 157–168.
37.
Endsley, M. R., and Bolstad, C. A. (1993). Human capabilities and limitations in situation awareness. In Combat automation for airborne weapon systems: Man/machine interface trends and technologies (AGARD-CP-520; pp. 19/1–19/10). Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France: NATO-Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
38.
Endsley, M. R., and Bolstad, C. A. (1994). Individual differences in pilot situation awareness. International/Journal of Aviation Psychology,4, 241–264.
39.
Endsley, M. R., and Kins, E. O. (in press). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors.
40.
Endsley, M. R., and Rodgers, M. D. (1994). Situation awareness information requirements for en route air traffic control (DOT/FAA/AM-94/27). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Medicine.
41.
Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance.. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
42.
Federal Aviation Administration. (1990). The national plan for aviation human factors.. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
43.
Fischer, U., Orasanu, J., and Montalvo, M. (1993). Efficient decision strategies on the flight deck. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 235–243). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
44.
Fracker, M. L. (1987). Situation awareness: A decision model. Unpublished manuscript. Dayton, OH.
45.
Fracker, M. L. (1988). A theory of situation assessment: Implications for measuring situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 102–106). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
46.
Fracker, M. L. (1989). Attention gradients in situation awareness. In Situational awareness in aerospace operations (AGARD-CP-478; pp. 6/1–6/10). Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France: NATO-Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
47.
Hansman, R. J., Wanke, C., Kuchar, J., Mykityshyn, M., Hahn, E., and Midkiff, A. (1992, September). Hazard alerting and situational awareness in advanced air transport cockpits.Presented at the 18th ICAS Congress, Beijing, China.
48.
Herstein, J. A. (1981). Keeping the voter's limit in mind: A cognitive processing analysis of decision making in voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,40, 843–861.
49.
Hinsley, D., Hayes, J. R., and Simon, H. A. (1977). From words to equations. In P. Carpenter and M. Just, (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
Hockey, G. R. J. (1970). Effect of loud noise on attentional selectivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 28–36.
51.
Hockey, G. R. J. (1986). Changes in operator efficiency as a function of environmental stress, fatigue and circadian rhythms. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. Thomas, (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 44/1–44/49). New York: Wiley.
52.
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. F., Nisbett, R. E., and Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning and discovery.. Cambridge: MIT Press.
53.
Humphreys, G. W. (1981). Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics,30, 291–302.
54.
Jacoby, L. L., and Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
55.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Decision making under stress. In L. Goldberger and S. Breznitz, (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 69–87). New York: Free Press.
56.
Jerison, H. J. (1957). Performance on a simple vigilance task in noise and quiet. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,29, 1163–1165.
57.
Jerison, H. J. (1959). Effects of noise on human performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,43, 96–101.
58.
Jones, R. A. (1977). Self-fulfilling prophecies: Social, psychological and physiological effects of expectancies.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
Judge, C. L. (1992). Situation awareness: modeling, measurement, and impacts. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 40–42). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
60.
Kaempf, G. L., Wolf, S., and Miller, T. E. (1993). Decision making in the AEGIS combat information center. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 1107–1111). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
61.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
62.
Kaplan, C. A., and Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology,22, 374–419.
63.
Keinan, G. (1987). Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52, 639–644.
64.
Keinan, G., and Friedland, N. (1987). Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under physical threat. Acta Psychologica,64, 219–228.
65.
Kellog, R. T. (1980). Is conscious attention necessary for longterm storage?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,6, 379–390.
66.
Klein, G. A. (1989a). Do decision biases explain too much?. Human Factors Society Bulletin,32(5), 1–3.
67.
Klein, G. A. (1989b). Recognition-primed decisions. In W. B. Rouse (Ed.), Advances in man-machine systems research (pp. 47–92. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
68.
Klein, G. A. (1993). Sources of error in naturalistic decisionmaking tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 368–371). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
69.
Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., and Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1986). Rapid decision making on the fire ground. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 576–580). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
70.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
Kuipers, A., Kappers, A., van Holten, C. R., van Bergen, J. H. W., and Oosterveld, W. J. (1989). Spatial disorientation incidents in the R.N.L.A.F. F16 and F5 aircraft and suggestions for prevention. In Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478, pp. OV-E-1--OV-E- 16). Copenhagen, Denmark: NATO-Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
72.
Lipshitz, R. (1987). Decision making in the real world: Developing descriptions and prescriptions from decision maker's retrospective accounts.. Boston: Boston University Center for Applied Sciences.
73.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Automaticity, resources, and memory: Theoretical controversies and practical implications. Human Factors, 3D, 583–598.
74.
MacMillian, J., Entin, E. B., and Serfaty, D. (1993). Evaluating expertise in a complex domain-Measures based on theory. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 1152–1155). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
75.
Mandler, G. (1982). Stress and thought processes. In L. Goldberger and S. Breznitz, (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 88–104. New York: Free Press.
76.
Manktelow, K., and Jones, J. (1987). Principles from the psychology of thinking and mental models. In M. M. Gardiner and B. Christie, (Eds.), Applying cognitive psychology to user-interface design (pp. 83–117. Chichester, England: Wiley.
77.
Martin, M., and Jones, G. V. (1984). Cognitive failures in everyday life. In J. E. Harris and P. E. Morris, (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions and absent-mindedness (pp. 173–190. London: Academic.
78.
Mayer, R. E. (1983). Thinking, problem solving, cognition.. New York: Freeman.
79.
McCarthy, G. W. (1988). Human factors in FI6 mishaps. Flying Safety, May, 17–21.
80.
Meister, D. (1971). Human factors: Theory and practice.. New York: Wiley.
81.
Ministry of Planning, Housing, Transport and Maritime Affairs. (1989). Investigation commission final report concerning the accident which occurred on June 26th, 1988, at Mulhouse-Habscheim (68) to the Airbus A320, registered F-GFKC.. Paris: Author.
82.
Mintzburg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work.. New York: Harper and Row.
83.
Moray, N. (1986). Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. Thomas, (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 40/1–40/51). New York: Wiley.
84.
Mosier, K. L., and Chidester, T. R. (1991). Situation assessment and situation awareness in a team setting. In Y. Queinnec and F. Daniellou, (Eds.), Designing for everyone (pp. 798–800. London: Taylor & Francis.
85.
National Transportation Safety Board. (1973). Aircraft accident report: Eastern Airlines 4011L-1011, Miami, Florida, December 29, 1972 (NTSB/AAR-73–14). Washington, DC: Author.
86.
National Transportation Safety Board. (1979). Aircraft accident report: United Airlines, Inc., McDonnell-Douglas DC-8–61, N8082U, Portland, Oregon, December 28, 1978 (NTSBI/AAR-79–07). Washington, DC: Author.
87.
National Transportation Safety Board. (1981). Aircraft separation incidents at Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport, Atlanta, Georgia (NTSB/SIR-81–6). Washington, DC: Author.
88.
National Transportation Safety Board. (1988). Aircraft accident report: Northwest Airlines, Inc., McDonnell-Douglas DC-9–82, N312RC, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, August 16, 1987 (NTSB/AAR-99–05). Washington, DC: Author.
89.
National Transportation Safety Board. (1990). Aircraft accident report: US Air Flight 105, Boeing 737–200, N282AU, Kansas International Airport, Missouri, September 8, 1989 (NTSB/AAR-90–04). Washington, DC: Author.
90.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology.. New York: Appleton-Century, Crofts.
91.
Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review,84, 231–259.
92.
Noble, D., Boehm-Davis, D., and Grosz, C. (1987). Rules, schema and decision making (NR 649–005). Vienna, VA: Engineering Research Associates.
93.
Norman, D. A. (1976). Memory and attention.. New York: Wiley.
94.
Norman, D. A. (1983). Apsychologist views human processing: Human errors and other phenomena suggest processing mechanisms. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Five papers on human-machine interaction (pp. 10–14. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego.
95.
Orasanu, J., Dismukes, R. K., and Fischer, U. (1993). Decision errors in the cockpit. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 363–367). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
96.
Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory and Cognition, 3, 519–526.
97.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, J. M., and Klein, R. (1976). Visual dominance: An information processing account of its origin and significance. Psychological Review,83, 157–171.
98.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, J. M., and Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatiallocation. In H. L. Pick and E. J. Saltzman, (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing (pp. 137–157. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
99.
Press, M. (1986). Situation awareness: Let's get serious about the clue-bird. Unpublished manuscript.
100.
Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and humanmachine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering.. New York: North-Holland.
101.
Rasmussen, J., and Rouse, W. B. (Eds.). (1981). Human detection and diagnosis of system failures.. New York: Plenum.
102.
Reason, J. (1984). Absent-mindedness and cognitive control. In J. E. Harris and P. E. Morris, (Eds.), Everyday memory, action and absent-mindedness (pp. 111–132. London: Academic.
103.
Reason, J. (1987). A framework for classifying errors. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, and J. Leplat, (Eds.), New technologies and human error (pp. 5–14. Chichester, England: Wiley.
104.
Roschelle, J., and Greeno, J. G. (1987). Mental models in expert physics reasoning (OTIC AD-AI84106). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
105.
Rouse, W. B., and Morris, N. M. (1985). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models (OTIC AD-A159080). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Man-Machine Systems Research.
106.
Sarter, N. B., and Woods, D. D. (1991). Situation awareness: A critical but ill-defined phenomenon. International Journal of Aviation Psychology,1, 45–57.
107.
Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
108.
Sharit, J., and Salvendy, G. (1982). Occupational stress: Review and reappraisal. Human Factors,24, 129–162.
109.
Sheridan, T. (1981). Understanding human error and aiding human diagnostic behavior In nuclear power plants. In J. Rasmussen and W. B. Rouse, (Eds.), Human detection and diagnosis of system failures (pp. 19–35).New York: Plenum.
110.
Simmel, E. C., and Shelton, R. (1987). An assessment of nonroutine situations by pilots: A two-part process. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine,58, 1119–1121.
111.
Sundstrom, G. A. (1987). Information search and decision making: The effects of information displays. Acta Psychologica,65, 165–179.
112.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science,12, 257–285.
113.
Taylor, R. M. (1989). Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478 pp. 3/1–3/17). Copenhagen, Denmark: NATO-Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
114.
Treisman, A., and Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features attention and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,10, 12–31.
115.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?. American Psychologist,40, 385–398.
116.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science,211, 453–458.
117.
U.S. Air Force 57th Fighter Wing. (1986). Intraflight command, control, and communications symposium final report.. Nellis Air Force Base, NV: Author.
118.
VanDijk, T. A., and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension.. New York: Academic.
119.
Venturino, M., Hamilton, W. L., and Dvorchak, S. R. (1989). Performance-based measures of merit for tactical situation awareness. In Situation Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478 pp. 4/1–4/5). Copenhagen, Denmark: NATO-Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
120.
Wachtel, P. L. (1967). Conceptions of broad and narrow attention. Psychological Bulletin,68, 417–429.
121.
Weltman, G., Smith, J. E., and Egstrom, G. H. (1971). Perceptual narrowing during simulated pressure-chamber exposure. Human Factors,13, 99–107.
122.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Engineering psychology and human performance. (1st ed.) Columbus, OH: Merrill.
123.
Wickens, C. D. (1992a). Engineering psychology and human performance. (2nd ed.) New York: HarperCollins.
124.
Wickens, C. D. (1992b). Workload and situation awareness: An analogy of history and implications.. Insight: The Visual Performance Technical Group Newsletter,14(4), 1–3.
125.
Wickens, C. D., Stokes, A. F., Barnett, B., and Hyman, F. (1988). Stress and pilot judgment: An empirical study using MIDIS, a microcomputer-based simulation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 173–177). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
126.
Wiener, E. L. (1993). Life in the second decade of the glass cockpit. In R. S. Jensen and D. Neumeister, (Eds.). In Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1–11). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.
127.
Wiener, E. L., and Curry, R. E. (1980). Flight deck automation: Promises and problems. Ergonomics,23, 995–1011.
128.
Wilson, J. R., and Rutherford, A. (1989). Mental models: Theory and application in human factors. Human Factors,31, 617–634.
129.
Wirstad, J. (1988). On knowledge structures for process operators. In L. P. Goodstein, H. B. Anderson, and S. E. Olsen, (Eds.), Tasks, errors, and mental models (pp. 50–69. London: Taylor & Francis.
130.
Woodhead, M. M. (1964). The effects of bursts of noise on an arithmetic task. American Journal of Psychology,77, 627–633.
131.
Wright, P. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology,59, 555–561.
