In two experiments we examined the effects of single- and dual-task training on the acquisition and transfer of dual-task skill. Subjects performed two consistently mapped (CM) visual search tasks (word-category search and spatial-pattern search). Experiment 1 demonstrated benefits in both reaction time and accuracy for dual-task practice over comparable single-task practice when the two search tasks were combined. Experiment 2 examined the effects of task timing under single-task, synchronous dual-task, and asynchronous dual-task conditions. Benefits similar to those found in the first experiment were obtained. These results suggest that dual-task training can be more effective than single-task training when two dissimilar CM search tasks need to be performed together.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., and Reynolds, P. (1972). On the division of attention: A disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,24, 225–235.
2.
Annett, J., and Kay, H. (1956). Skilled performance. Occupational Psychology,30, 112–117.
3.
Battig, W. F., and Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph,80, 1–46.
4.
Broadbent, D. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica,50, 253–290.
5.
Brown, T. L., and Carr, T. H. (1989). Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,15, 686–700.
6.
Craig, A. (1979). Nonparametric measures of sensory efficiency for sustained monitoring tasks. Human Factors,21, 69–78.
7.
Damos, D. L. (Ed.). (1991). Multiple-task performance.. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
8.
DeJong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,19, 965–980.
9.
Downey, J. E., and Anderson, J. E. (1915). Automatic writing. American Journal of Psychology,26, 161–195.
10.
Durso, F. T., Cooke, N. M., Breen, T. J., and Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1987). Is consistent mapping necessary for highspeed search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,13, 223–229.
11.
Fisk, A. D., Oransky, N. A., and Skedsvold, P. R. (1988). Examination of the role of "higher-order" consistency in skill development. Human Factors,30, 567–581.
12.
Fisk, A. D., and Schneider, W. (1983). Category and word search: Generalizing search principles to complex processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,9, 177–195.
13.
Hirst, W., Spelke, E. S., Reaves, C. C., Caharack, G., and Neisser, U. (1980). Dividing attention without alternation or automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 98–117.
14.
Kramer, A., Strayer, D. L., and Buckley, J. (1990). Development and transfer of automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,16, 505–522.
15.
Lintern, G., and Wickens, C. D. (1991). Issues for acquisition and transfer of timesharing and dual-task skill. In D. Damos (Ed.), Multiple-task performance (pp. 123–138. Bristol. PA: Taylor & Francis.
16.
McCann, R. S., and Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the singlechannel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,18, 471–484.
17.
Navon, D., and Miller, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,13, 435–448.
18.
Naylor, J. C., and Briggs, G. E. (1963). Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 217–224.
19.
Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,10, 358–377.
20.
Pashler, H. (1993). Dual-task interference and elementary mental mechanisms. In D. E. Meyer and S. Kornblum, (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 245–264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers,20, 206–217.
22.
Schneider, W., and Detweiler, M. (1988). The role of practice in dual-task performance: Toward workload modeling in a connectionist/control architecture. Human Factors,30, 539–566.
23.
Schneider, W., and Fisk, A. D. (1982). Concurrent automatic and controlled visual search: Can processing occur without resource cost?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,8, 261–278.
24.
Schneider, W., and Fisk, A. D. (1984). Automatic category search and its transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,10, 1–15.
25.
Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
26.
Shaffer, H. (1975). Multiple attention in continuous verbal tasks. In P. M. A. Rabbitt and S. Dornic, (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 157–167. New York: Academic.
27.
Shiffrin, R. M. (1988). Attention. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, and R. D. Luce, (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, 2nd ed., (pp. 739–811. New York: Wiley.
28.
Shiffrin, R. M., and Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review,84, 127–190.
29.
Smith, M. (1967). Theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychological Bulletin,19, 352–359.
30.
Spelke, E., Hirst, W., and Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 215–230.
31.
Stammers, R. B. (1982). Part and whole practice in training for procedural tasks. Human Learning,1, 185–207.
32.
Venturino, M. (1991). Automatic processing, code dissimilarity, and the efficiency of successive memory searches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,17, 677–695.
33.
Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high speed performance--A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology,43, 2–19.
34.
Welford, A. T. (1980). The single-channel hypothesis. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction time (pp. 215–252. New York: Academic.
35.
Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional processes. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239–257. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies, (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102. New York: Academic.
37.
Wickens, C. D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. In D. Damos (Ed.), Multiple-task performance (pp. 3–34. London: Taylor & Francis.
38.
Wickens, C. D., and Liu, Y. (1988). Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors,30, 599–616.
39.
Wightman, D. C., and Lintern, G. (1985). Part-task training for tracking and manual control. Human Factors,27, 267–283.
