Situation awareness (SA) is a relatively new concept that has captured the imagination of the human factors community. This new concept is considered in the light of Benton J. Underwood's discussion about psychological concepts. In particular the distinction between SA as a phenomenon description (Level 2 concept) and SA as a causal agent (Level 3 concept) is discussed. The argument that SA is valuable as a phenomenon description draws attention to the intimate interactions between human and environment in determining meaning (or what matters) and reflects an increased appreciation for the intimate coupling between processing stages (e.g., perception, decision, and action) within closed-loop systems. However, I caution against considering SA as a causal agent. When SA is considered to be an object within the cognitive agent, there is a danger of circular reasoning in which SA is presented as the cause of itself. As a causal explanation, SA is a simple, easy-to-understand wrong answer that, in the end, will be an obstacle to research. As a phenomenon description, SA invites further research to discover causal relationships between the design of human-machine systems and the resulting performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bennett, K. B., and Flach, J. M. (1992). Graphical displays: Implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors,34, 513–533.
2.
Blanchard, R. E. (1993). Situation awareness-Transition from theory to practice. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 39–42). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3.
Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5.
Endsley, M. R. (1993). Situation awareness: The development and application of a theoretical framework. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 39–40). Santa Monica. CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6.
Endsley, M. R. (1994). Situation awareness: Some reflections and comments. In R. D. Gilson, D. J. Garland and J. M. Koonce, (Eds.), Situational awareness in complex systems (pp. 315–317. Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
7.
Flach, J. M. (1990). Control with an eye for perception: Precursors to an active psychophysics. Ecological Psychology,2, 83–111.
8.
Flach, J. M. (1993). Active psychophysics: A psychophysical program for closed-loop systems. In E. J. Haug (Ed.), Concurrent engineering: Tools and technologies for mechanical system design (pp. 987–993. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Flach, J. M. (1994a). Beyond the servomechanism: Implications of closed-loop, adaptive couplings for modeling human-machine systems. In Proceedings of the '94 Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems (pp. 401–406). Greensboro: North Carolina A&T State University.
10.
Flach, J. M. (1994b). Ruminations on mind, matter, and what matters. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 531–535). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
11.
Flach, J. M. (1994c). Situation awareness: The emperor's new clothes. In M. Mouloua and R. Parasuraman, (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 241–248. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Flach, J. M., and Bennett, K. B. (in press). Methodological issues for evaluation of interfaces: A case for representative design. In R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua, (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and application.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Flach, J. M., and Warren, R. (1995). Active psychophysics: The relation between mind and what matters. In J. M. Flach, P. A. Hancock, J. K. Caird, and K. J. Vicente, (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems (pp. 189–209. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Fleishman, E. A., and Quintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance.. Orlando, FL: Academic.
15.
Gawron, V. J. (1991). Situation awareness: Tools and measurement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 47–66). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1979)
17.
Gilson, R. D., Garland, D. J., and Koonce, J. M. (Eds.). (1994). Situational awareness in complex systems. Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
18.
Hammond, K. R. (1966). The psychology of Egon Brunswik.. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
19.
Hartel, C. E. J., Smith, K., and Prince, C. (1991). Defining aircrew coordination: Searching mishaps for meaning.Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
20.
Judge, C. A. (1992). Situation awareness: Modeling, measurement, and impacts. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 40–42). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
21.
Kirlik, A. (1995). Requirements for psychological models to support design: Toward ecological task analysis. In J. M. Flach, P. A. Hancock, J. K. Caird, and K. J. Vicente, (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems (pp. 68–119) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Klein, G. A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. In W. Rouse (Ed.), Advances in man-machine systems research (pp. 47–92. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
23.
Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. (1993). Decision making in action: Models and methods.. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24.
Mace, W. M. (1977). James J. Gibson's strategy for perceiving: Ask not what's inside your head but what your head's inside of. In R. E. Shaw and J. Bransford, (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 43–65. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology.. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
26.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology.. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
27.
Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review,88, 1–15.
28.
Pew, R. W. (1994). Situation awareness: The buzzword of the '90s.. CSERIAC Gateway,5(1), 1–4.
29.
Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering.. New York: Elsevier.
30.
Rasmussen, J., and Vicente, K. J. (1989). Coping with human errors through system design: Implications for ecological interface design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,31, 517–534.
31.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error.. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Sarter, N. B., and Woods, D. D. (1991). Situation awareness: A critical but ill-defined phenomenon. International Journal of Aviation Psychology,1, 45–57.
33.
Taylor, F. (1957). Psychology and the design of machines. American Psychologist,12, 249–258.
34.
Tenney, Y. J., Adams, M. J., Pew, R. W., Huggins, A. W. F., and Rogers, W. H. (1992). A principled approach to the measurement of situation awareness in commercial aviation (NASA Contractor Report 4451). Langley, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
35.
Underwood, B. J. (1957). Psychological research.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36.
Vicente, K. J. (1990). A few implications of an ecological approach to human factors.. Human Factors Society Bulletin.33(11), 1–4.
37.
Waldrup, M. (1992). Complexity.. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38.
Warren, R., and McMillan, G. (1984). Altitude control using action-demanding interactive displays: Toward an active psychophysics. In Proceedings of the 1984 IMAGE III Conference (pp. 405–415). Phoenix, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
39.
Woods, D. D. (1995). Toward a theoretical base for representation design in the computer medium: Ecological perception and aiding human cognition. In J. M. Flach. P. A. Hancock, J. K. Caird, and K. J. Vicente, (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems pp. 158–188Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
