Judgments of Azimuth and Elevation as a Function of Monoscopic and Binocular Depth Cues Using a Perspective Display

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of three-dimensional display formats for judgments of spatial information using an exocentric frame of reference. Eight subjects judged the azimuth and elevation that separated two computer-generated objects using either a perspective or stereoscopic display. Errors, which consisted of the difference in absolute value between the estimated and actual azimuth or elevation, were analyzed as the response variable. The data indicated that the stereoscopic display resulted in more accurate estimates of elevation, especially for images aligned approximately orthogonally to the viewing vector. However, estimates of relative azimuth direction were not improved by use of the stereoscopic display. Furthermore, it was shown that the effect of compression resulting from a 45--deg computer graphics eye point elevation produced a response bias that was symmetrical around the horizontal plane of the reference cube, and that the depth cue of binocular disparity provided by the stereoscopic display reduced the magnitude of the compression errors. Implications of the results for the design of spatial displays are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alluisi, E. A. (Ed.). (1961). Lineal inclination in encoding information symbolically on cathode ray tubes and similar displays (Tech. Report AF 33[616]-6(66). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: U.S. Air Force. Aerospace Medical Laboratory, Behavioral Sciences Laboratory.

Barfield, W. , Lim, R. , and Rosenberg, C. (1990). Visual enhancements and geometric field of view as factors in the design of a three-dimensional perspective display. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 1470–1473). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Barfield, W. , and Hendrix, C. (1995). Rotation of the computer graphics eyepoint as an enhancement to a perspective display. Manuscript in preparation, University of Washington.

Bemis, S. V. , Leeds, J. L , and Winer, E. A. (1988). Operator performance as a function of type of display: Conventional versus perspective. Human Factors, 30, 163–169.

Burnett, M. , and Barfield, W. (1991). An evaluation of a planview versus perspective display for an air traffic controller task. In Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 448–453). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

Ellis, S. R. , and McGreevy, M. W. (1983). Influence of a perspective cockpit traffic display format on pilot avoidance maneuvers. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 762–765). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Ellis, S. R. , Tharp, G. , Grunwald, A. , and Smith, S. (1991). Exocentric judgments in real environments and stereoscopic displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 1442–1446). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Hendrix, C., and Barfield, W. (in press). Relationship between monocular and binocular depth cues for judgments of spatial information and spatial instrument design. Displays.

Kim, W. S. , Ellis, S. R. , Tyler, M. , Hannaford, B. , and Stark, L. (1987). A quantitative evaluation of perspective and stereoscopic displays in three-axis manual tracking tasks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-17, 61–71.

10.

McGreevy, M. W. , and Ellis, S. R. (1986). The effect of perspective geometry on judged spatial information instruments. Human Factors, 28, 439–456.

11.

Parrish, R. V. , and Williams, S. P. (1990). Stereopsis cueing effects on hover-in-turbulence performance in a simulated rotocraft (NASA Tech. Paper 2980 AVSCOM, Tech. Report 90--B-002). Langley, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

12.

Pepper, R. L. , Smith, D. C. , and Cole, R. E. (1981). Stereo TV improves operator performance under degraded visibility conditions. Optical Engineering, 20, 579–585.

13.

Sollenberger, R. L. , and Milgram, P. (1989). Stereoscopic computer graphics for neurosurgery. In G. Salvendy and M. J. Smith , (Eds.), Designing and using human-computer interfaces and knowledge based systems (pp. 294–301. New York: Elsevier.

14.

Yeh, Y. , and Silverstein, L. (1992). Spatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays. Human Factors, 34, 583–600.