Situation Awareness Is Adaptive,Externally Directed Consciousness

Abstract

We define situation awareness (SA) as adaptive, externally directed consciousness. This definition dispels the artificial and contentious division evident in the literature, according to which SA is either exclusively knowledge or exclusively process. This misdirected rivalry has more to do with general perspectives on the study of human behavior than with SA itself. Through defining SA as an aspect of consciousness, we hope to clarify two key issues. (1) The source of goals with respect to SA is a normative arbiter in the task environment; that is, the behavior that SA generates must be directed at an external goal. (2) SA is the invariant at the core of the agent's perception-action cycle that supports skilled performance; that is, relationships among factors or dimensions in the environment determine what the agent must know and do to achieve the goals specified by the external arbiter. We introduce a construct we call the risk space to represent the invariant relations in the environment that enable the agent to adapt to novel situations and to attain prespecified goals. We articulate this concept of a risk space through use of a specific example in commercial aircraft operations. The risk space structures information about the physical airspace in a manner that captures the momentary knowledge that drives action and that satisfies the goals and performance criteria for safe and efficient flight. We note that the risk space may be generalized to many different means of navigation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bennett, K. B. , and Flach, J. M. (1992). Graphical displays: Implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors, 34, 513–533.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax.. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571–582.

Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Fancher, P. S. , Ervin, R. D. , Bareket, Z. , Johnson, G. E. , Trefalt, M. , Tiedecke, J. , and Hagleitner, W. (1994, April). Intelligent cruise control: Performance studies based upon an operating prototype. Paper presented at the 1994 Annual Meeting of IVHS America, Atlanta, GA.

Flach, J. , Hancock, P. A. , Caird, J. K. , and Vicente, K. (Eds). (1995). Global perspectives on an ecological approach to human-machine systems.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Freeman, G. L. (1948). The energetics of human behavior.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Gentner, D. , and Stevens, A. L. (1983). Mental models.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception.. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

11.

Hancock, P. A. , Flach, J. , Caird, J. K. , and Vicente, K. (Eds.). (1995). Local applications in an ecological approach to human-machine systems.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Hansen, J. P. (1995). Representation of system invariants by optical invariants in configural displays for process control. In P. A. Hancock , J. M. Flach , J. K. Caird , and K. H. Vicente , (Eds.), Local applications in an ecological approach to human-machine systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

13.

Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1975)

14.

Hopkin, V. D. (1988). Air traffic control. In E. L. Wiener and D. C. Nagel , (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 639–663. San Diego, CA: Academic.

15.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Koestler, A. (1978). Janus.. New York: Random House.

17.

Kozak, J. J. , Hancock, P. A. , Arthur, E. J. , and Chrysler, S. T. (1993). Transfer of training from virtual reality. Ergonomics, 36, 777–784.

18.

Marr, D. (1982). Vision.. San Francisco: Freeman.

19.

Moray, N. (1986). Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. In K. R. Boff , L. Kaufman , and J. P. Thomas , (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 40.1–40.51). New York: Wiley.

20.

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology.. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

21.

Newell, A. (1981). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87–127.

22.

Newell, A. , and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

23.

Phatak, A. V. , and Bekey, G. A. (1969). Decision processes in the adaptive behavior of human controllers. IEEE Transactions of Systems Science and Cybernetics, 5, 339–352.

24.

Simon, H. A. (1982). Sciences of the artificial. (2nd ed.) Cambridge: MIT Press.

25.

Smith, K. , and Hancock, P. A. (1992). Managing risk under time stress. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 1019–1023). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

26.

Tenney, Y. J. , Adams, M. J. , Pew, R. W. , Huggins, A. W. F. , and Rogers, W. H. (1992). A principled approach to the measurement of situation awareness in commercial aviation (NASA Contractor Report 4451). Langley, VA: NASA.

27.

Vicente, K. J. , and Rasmussen, J. (1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22, 589–606.

28.

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–167.

29.

Wickens, C. D. (1993). Workload and situation awareness: An analogy of history and implications. Insight: The Visual Performance Technical Group Newsletter, 14, 4.