Acquisition of Control Skill with Delayed and Compensated Displays

Abstract

The difficulty of mastering a two-axis, compensatory, manual control task was manipulated by introducing transport delays into the feedback loop of the controlled element. Realistic aircraft dynamics were used. Subjects' display was a simulation of an "inside-out" artificial horizon instrument perturbed by atmospheric turbulence. The task was to maintain straight and level flight, and delays tested were representative of those found in current training simulators. Delay compensations in the form of first-order lead and first-order lead/lag transfer functions, along with an uncompensated condition, were factorially combined with added delays. Subjects were required to meet a relatively strict criterion for performance. Control activity showed no differences during criterion performance, but the trials needed to achieve the criterion were linearly related to the magnitude of the delay and the compensation condition. These data were collected in the context of aircraft attitude control, but the results can be applied to the simulation of other vehicles, to remote manipulation, and to maneuvering in graphical environments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baron, S. , Lancraft, R. , and Caglayan, A. (1982). An optimal control model approach to the design of compensators for simulator delay (Tech. Report CR 3604., Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Berry, D. T. , Powers, B. C, Szalai, K. J. , and Wilson, R. J. (1982). In-flight evaluation of control system pure time delays. Journal of Aircraft, 19, 318–323.

Cardullo, F. , and George, G. (1993). Transport delay compensation: An alternative to increasing image generator up date rate. In AIAA Simulation Technologies Conference (pp. 95–102, AIAA Paper 93–3563). New York: American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Crane, D. F. (1983). Compensation for time delay in flight simulator visual-display system., In AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference (pp. 163–17., AIAA Paper 83–1080). New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Hess, R. A. (1984a). Analysis of aircraft attitude control systems prone to pilot-induced oscillations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 7, 106–112.

Hess, R. A. (1984b). Effects of time delays on systems subject to manual control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 7, 416–421.

McFarland, R. E. (1988). Transport delay compensation for computer-generated imagery systems (Tech. Report TMI00084., Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Parrish, R. V. , Dieudonne, J. E. , Martin, D. J. , and Copeland, J. L (1973). Compensation based on linearized analysis for a six-degree-of-freedom motion simulator (Tech. Note TN 07349., Hampton, VA: Nationll Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Ricard, G. L. (1994). Manual control with delayed feedback: A bibliography. Computer Graphics, 28, 149–154.

10.

Ricard, G. L. , and Harris, W. T. (1980). Lead/lag dynamics to compensate for display delays. Journal of Aircraft, 17, 212–217.

11.

Ricard, G. L. , Norman, D. A. , and Collyer, S. C. (1976). Compensating for flight simulator CGI system delays. In Proceedings of the 9th NTECI Industry Conference (pp. 131–138, Tech. Report NAVTRAEQUIPCEN IH-276). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.

12.

Riccio, G. E. , Cress, J. D. , and Johnson, W. V. (1987). The effects of simulator time delay on the acquisition of flight control skills: Control of heading and altitude. In Proceedings of Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 1286–1290). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.