Whether or not lifting belts protect workers from injury is a topic of considerable interest in industry. Not only is the protective effect uncertain, but the biomechanical basis for belt function is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if lifting belts provide a means for controlling trunk motions during asymmetric material-handling tasks. We recruited 16 nursing personnel as experienced lifters to participate in two lifting sessions. A lifting belt was worn in one session and for a week prior to this session during the subjects' routine work activities. Each session required 42 lifts, distributed across three asymmetry conditions (0, 45, and 90 deg) and temporally spaced 30 s apart. Foot motion was not permitted in half the lifts. Results indicated that during lifting, lateral bending and twisting motions were reduced by both the lifting belt and foot motion; the most pronounced effect was observed at 90 deg of asymmetry. Trunk motions in the sagittal plane during lifting were not affected by the lifting belt. These results appear to support the use of lifting belts in asymmetric lifting conditions, but more research is needed to determine whether the muscles in the torso benefit from the reduced motion or are working harder to overcome this resistance to motion, causing increased internal loads on the spine during asymmetric material-handling tasks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersson, G. B. J. (1991). The epidemiology of spinal disorders. In J. W. Frymoyer (Ed.), The adult spine: Principles and practice (pp. 107–146). New York: Raven.
2.
Bartelink, D. L. (1957). The role of abdominal pressure in relieving the pressure on the lumbar intervertebral discs. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 39B, 718–725.
3.
Bigos, S. J., Spengler, D. M., Martin, N. A., Zeh, J., Fisher, L., and Nachemson, A. (1986). Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study: III. Employee-related factors. Spine, 11, 252–256.
4.
Buseck, M., Schipplein, O. D., Andersson, G. B. J., and Andriacchi, T. P. (1988). Influence of dynamic factors and external loads on the moment at the lumbar spine in lifting. Spine, 13,918–921.
5.
Bush-Joseph, C., Schipplein, O., Andersson, G. B. J., and Andriacchi, T. P. (1988). Influence of dynamic factors on the lumbar spine moment in lifting. Ergonomics, 31, 211–216.
6.
Caldwell, L. S., Chaffin, D. B., Dukes-Dobos, F. N., Kroemer, K. H. E., Laubach, L. L., Snook, S. H., and Waserman, D. E. (1974). A proposed procedure for static muscle strength testing. American Industrial Hygiene Journal, 35, 201–212.
7.
Farfan, H. F., Cossette, J. W., Robertson, G. H., Wells, R. V., and Kraus, H. (1970). The effects of torsion on the lumbar intervertebral joints: The role of torsion in the production of disc degeneration. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 52A, 468–497.
8.
Frymoyer, J. W., Pope, M. H., Clements, J. H., Wilder, D. G., McPherson, B., and Ashikaga, T. (1983). Risk factors in low back pain: An epidemiological survey. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 65A, 213–218.
9.
Gagnon, M., Plamondon, A., and Gravel, D. (1993). Pivoting with the load: An alternative for protecting the back in asymmetrical lifting. Spine, 18, 1515–1524.
10.
Harman, E. A., Rosenstein, R. M., Frykman, P. N., and Nigro, G. A. (1989). Effects of a belt on intra-abdominal pressure during weight lifting. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 21, 186–190.
11.
Kumar, S., and Godfrey, C. M. (1986). Spinal braces and abdominal support. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), Trends in ergo nomics/human factors III (pp. 717–726). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12.
Ladin, Z., Murthy, K. R., and De Luca, C. J. (1989). Mechanical recruitment of low-back muscles: Theoretical predictions and experimental validation. Spine, 9, 927–938.
13.
Lander, J. E., Hundley, J. R., and Simonton, R. L. (1992). The effectiveness of weight-belts during multiple repetitions of the squat exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 24, 603–609.
14.
Lander, J. E., Simonton, R. L., and Giacobbe, J. K. F. (1990). The effectiveness of weight belts during the squat exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 22, 117–126
15.
Lavender, S. A., Tsuang, Y. H., and Andersson, G. B. J. (1993). Trunk muscle activation and cocontraction while resisting applied moments in a twisted posture. Ergonomics, 36, 1145–1157.
16.
Lavender, S. A., Tsuang, Y. H., Andersson, G. B. J., Hafezi, A., and Shin, C. C. (1992). Trunk muscle cocontraction: The effects of moment direction and moment magnitude. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 10, 691–700.
17.
Liggett, M. T. (1989). Effects of weight lifting with and without abdominal belt on intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
18.
Marra., W. S., Fathallah, F., Miller, R. J.,Davis, S. W., and Mirka, G. A. (1992). Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristic. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 9. 75–87.
19.
Marra., W. S., Lavender, S. A., Leurgan., S. E., Rajulu, S. L., Allread, W. G., Fathallah, F. A., and Ferguson, S. A. (1993). The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally related low back disorders: The effects of workplace factors, trunk position, and trunk motion characteristics on risk of injury. Spine, 18, 617–628.
20.
Marra., W. S., and Mirka, G. A. (1989). Trunk strength during asymmetric trunk motion. Human Factors, 31, 667–677.
21.
Marras, W. S., and Mirka, G. A. (1992). A comprehensive evaluation of trunk response to asymmetric trunk motion. Spine, 17, 318–326.
22.
McGill, S. M., Norman, R. W., and Sharratt, M. T. (1990). The effect of an abdominal belt on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure during squat lifts. Ergonomics, 33, 147–168.
23.
Morris, J. M., Lucas, D. B., and Bresler, B. (1961). Role of the trunk in stability of the spine. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 43A, 327–351.
24.
Nachemson, A. L., Schultz, A. B., and Andersson, G. B. J., (1983). Mechanical effectiveness of lumbar spine orthoses. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (Suppl. 9), 139–149.
25.
Pope, M. H., Andersson, G. B. J., Broman, H.Svensson, M., and Zetterberg, C. (1986). Electromyographic studies of the lumbar trunk musculature during the development of axial torque. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 4, 288–297.
26.
Punnett, L., Fine, L. J., Keyserling, W. M., Herrin, G. D., and Chaffin, D. B. (1991). Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly worker., Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 17, 337–346.
27.
Reddell, C., Congleton, J., Huchingson, D., and Montgomery, J. (1992). An evaluation of a weight lifting belt and back injury prevention training class for airline baggage handlers. Applied Ergonomics, 25, 319–329.
28.
Seguin, J., and McGill, S. (1992). The effect of abdominal belts on passive stiffness of the trunk about three axes. In The Economics of Ergonomics: Human Factors Association of Canada 25th Annual Conference (pp. 67–72). Mississauga, Canada: Human Factors Association of Canada.
29.
Seroussi, R. E., and Pope, M. H. (1987). The relationship between trunk muscle electromyography and lifting moments in the sagittal and frontal planes. Journal of Biomechanics, 20, 135–146.
30.
Snook, S. H., Campanelli, R. A., and Hart, J. W. (1978). A study of three preventive approaches to low back injury. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 20, 478–481.
31.
Walsh, N. E., and Schwartz, R. K. (1990). The influence of prophylactic orthoses on abdominal strength and low back injury in the workplace. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 245–250.
