Objective: Our research examined the effects of practice on cell-phone—related driver distraction. Background: The driving literature is ambiguous as to whether practice can reduce driver distraction from concurrent cell phone conversation. Methods: Drivers reporting either high or low real-world cell phone usage were selected to participate in four 90-min simulated driving sessions on successive days. The research consisted of two phases: a practice phase and a novel transfer phase. Results: Dual-task performance deficits persisted through practice and transfer driving conditions. Moreover, groups reporting high and low real-world experience exhibited similar driving impairments when conversing on a hands-free cell phone. Conclusions: These data indicate that practice is unlikely to eliminate the disruptive effects of concurrent cell phone use on driving. Application: Multiple regulatory agencies have considered, or are currently considering, legislation to restrict in-vehicle cell phone use. Findings reported herein may be useful to inform these public policy decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behavior in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 707-715.
Brookhuis, K.A., de Vries, G., & de Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance . Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309-316.
4.
Brown, I.D., Tickner, A.H., & Simmonds, K.C.V. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Physiology , 53, 419-424.
5.
Cohen, J. (1992). Apower primer. Psychological Bulletin , 112, 155-159.
6.
Consiglio, W., Driscoll, P., & Witte, M. (2003). Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 494-500.
7.
Cooper, J.M., & Strayer, D.L. (2007). Do driving impairments from concurrent cell-phone use diminish with practice? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting (pp. 1536-1539). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
8.
Hancock, P.A., Lesch, M., & Simmons, L. (2003). The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Analysis and Prevention , 35, 501-514.
9.
Horrey, W.J., & C.D. Wickens. (2003). Multiple resource modeling of task interference in vehicle control, hazard awareness and in-vehicle task performance . In Proceedings of the Second International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 7-12). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center .
10.
Kramer, A.F., Larish, J.F., & Strayer, D.L. (1995). Practice for attentional control in dual-task settings: A comparison of young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 50-76.
11.
Laberge-Nadeau, C., Maag, U., Bellavance, F., Lapierre, S.D., Desjardins, D., Messier, S., et al. (2003). Wireless telephones and the risk of road collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 649-660.
12.
Levy, J., Pashler, H., & Boer, E. (2006). Central interference in driving: Is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Science, 17, 228-235.
13.
McEvoy, S.P., Stevenson, M.R., &McCartt,A.T. (2005). Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: A case-crossover study. British Medical Journal, 331, 428-430.
14.
McKnight, A.J., & McKnight, A.S. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis and Prevention , 25, 259-265.
15.
Norman, D.A., & Bobrow, D.G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes . Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
16.
Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
17.
Redelmeier, M.D., & Tibshirani, R.J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453-458.
18.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
19.
Shinar, D., Tractinsky, N., & Compton, R. (2005). Effects of practice, age, and task demands on interference from a phone task while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 315-326.
20.
Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A., & Johnston, W.A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-32.
21.
Strayer, D.L., & Johnston, W.A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone . Psychological Science, 12, 462-466.
22.
Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2004). Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 795-810.
23.
Wickens, C. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction . Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159-177.
