Objective: Our goal was to briefly describe how macroergonomics was developed to fill a void in human factors and ergonomics. Background: A study commissioned by the Human Factors Society in 1978 resulted in the formalization of a new subdiscipline of human factors, called organizational design and management, which eventually was coined macroergonomics.Method: Differentiators of macroergonomics are presented along with methods adapted from other domains as well as unique methods. Results: Based on laboratory and field studies conducted at multiple universities, government facilities, and industries, work system factors can be manipulated in the laboratory and studied in the field successfully. Also, case studies in academia, industry, and government demonstrate 60% to 90% performance impact and positive qualitative changes such as culture change. Conclusion: Macroergonomics offers a perspective as well as methods and tools for more successful human factors and ergonomics design, development, intervention, and implementation. Application: Human factors engineers or psychologists and ergonomists can use the perspective of macroergonomics to achieve better results or can expand their involvement of macroergonomics through the use of methods and tools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bedeian, A.G., & Zammuto, R.F. (1991). Organizations: Theory and design. Chicago: Dryden.
2.
Boehm-Davis, D.A., Casali, J.G., Kleiner, B.M., Lancaster, J., Saleem, J., & Wochinger, K. (2007). Pilot performance, strategy, and workload while executing approaches at steep angles and with lower landing minima. Human Factors, 49, 759-772.
3.
Burns, C.M., Bisantz, A.M., & Roth, E.M. (2004). Lessons from a comparison of work domain models: Representational choices and their implications. Human Factors , 46, 711-727.
4.
Carayon, P., & Haims, M.C. (2003). Balanced work system and participation in quality management: Applications in the community. AI and Society , 17, 97-113.
5.
Carayon, P., Smith, M.J., & Haims, M.C. (1999). Work organization, job stress and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Human Factors, 41, 644-663.
6.
Haines, H., Wilson, J.R., Vink, P., & Koningsveld, E. (2002). Validating a framework for participatory ergonomics (the PEF). Ergonomics, 45, 309-327.
7.
Hendrick, H.W. (1991). Ergonomics in organizational design and management . Ergonomics, 34, 743-756.
8.
Hendrick, H.W. (1996). Economics of ergonomics. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9.
Hendrick, H.W. (2003). Determining the cost-benefits of ergonomics projects and factors that lead to their success. Applied Ergonomics , 34, 419-427.
10.
Hendrick, H.W., & Kleiner, B.M. (2001). Macroergonomics: An introduction to work system design. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
11.
Hendrick, H. W., & Kleiner, B. M. (Eds.). (2002). Macroergonomics: Theory, methods and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Kleiner, B.M. (2002). Macroergonomics in large-scale organizational change. In H. W. Hendrick & B. M. Kleiner (Eds.), Macroergonomics: Theory, methods and applications (pp. 273-289). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Kleiner, B.M., & Booher, H.R. (2003). Human systems integration education and training . In H. R. Booher (Ed.), Handbook of human systems integration (pp. 121-163). Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.
14.
Kleiner, B.M., & Hendrick, H.W. (1999). Revisiting macroergonomics as an integrating mechanism for TQM and ergonomics. In J. Axelsson, J. Eklund, & B. Bergman (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on TQM and Human Factors (pp. 128-133). Linkoping, Sweden: CMTO.
15.
Nagamachi, M., & Imada, A. (1992). A macroergonomic approach for improving safety and work design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting - 1992 (pp. 859-861). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16.
Pew, R. W. (Ed.). (1983). Research needs for human factors. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
Pew, R. W., & Mavor, A. S. (Eds.). (2007). Human-system integration in the system development process: A new look. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
18.
Robbins, S.R. (1983). Organization theory: The structure and design of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
Saleem, J.J., & Kleiner, B.M. (2006). Acase-based review of critical incidents in general aviation for improved safety. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 6, 271-281.
20.
Smith, M.J., & Sainfort, P.C. (1989). A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 4, 67-79.
21.
Stanton, N., Hedge,A. , Brookhuis, K., Salas, E., & Hendrick, H. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
22.
Stevenson, W.B. (1993). Organizational design. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 141-168). New York: Marcel Dekker.
