Objective: This study examined the effect of two in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) on signal detection in the visual, auditory, and tactile modalities; established whether the detrimental effects of an IVIS on driving could be quantified by these detection tasks; and examined the effect of stimulus modality on signal detection. Background: The peripheral detection task has been used widely for assessing the effects of an IVIS on driving. However, performance on this task relies on drivers' ability to see a series of LEDs, which can be problematic in field tests (e.g., on sunny days). Method: Participants responded to one of three detection tasks during a simulated driving experiment. The effect of IVIS interaction on these detection tasks was also measured. Reduced performance in the detection tasks was assumed to indicate a decline in drivers' ability to handle sudden events in the driving task. Results: Response time to all detection tasks increased by around 200 ms when drivers performed the IVIS tasks, as compared with baseline driving. Analyses of variance and comparison of effect sizes showed the effects of these two IVISs to be the same across the three detection tasks. Conclusion: These detection tasks are useful for quantifying the safety of an IVIS during driving. The absence of a difference in signal detection by modality suggests that performance on these tasks relies on general attentional resources and is not modality specific. Application: The signal detection tasks employed here should be further investigated for their suitability in assessing the safety of in-vehicle systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1994). Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile telephones: A simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 441-451.
2.
Amado, S., & Ulupinar, P. (2005). The effects of conversation on attention and peripheral detection: Is talking with a passenger and talking on the cell phone different ? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour , 6, 383-395.
3.
Angell, L.S., Auflick, J., Austria, P.A., Kochar, D., Tijerina, L.Biever, W.J., et al. (2006). Driver Workload Metrics Task 2 Final Report (DOT HS 810 635). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
4.
Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Baddeley, A.D., & Logie, R.H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple component model. InA. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bourke, P.A., Duncan, J., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1996). A general factor involved in dual-task performance decrement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 525-545.
7.
Brookhuis, K.A., De Vries, G., & de Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance . Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309-316.
8.
Carsten, O., Merat, N., Janssen, W.H., Johansson, E., Fowkes, M., & Brookhuis, K.A. (2005). HASTE final report (European Commission, Project No. GRD1/2000/25361). Leeds, UK: University of Leeds. Available from http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/haste/deliverable.htm
9.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated frame-work . New York: Oxford University Press .
11.
de Waard, D., & Brookhuis, K. (1991). Assessing driver status: A demonstration experiment on the road. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 297-307.
12.
Engström, J., Åberg, N., Johansson, E., & Hammerbäck, J. (2005). Comparison between visual and tactile signal detection tasks applied to the safety assessment of in-vehicle information systems. In Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 232-240). Iowa City: University of Iowa Public Policy Center.
13.
Engström, J., Johansson, E., & Östlund, J. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 97-120.
14.
Greenberg, J., Tijerina, L., Curry, R., Artz, B., Cathey, L., Kochhar, D., et al. (2003). Driver distraction: Evaluation with event detection paradigm. Transportation Research Record, 1843, 1-9.
15.
Harms, L., & Patten, C. (2003). Peripheral detection as a measure of driver distraction: A study of memory-based versus system-based navigation in a built-up area . Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6, 23-36.
16.
Horrey, W.J., & Wickens, C.D. (2006). Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48, 196-205.
17.
Jahn, G., Oehme, A., Krems, J.F., & Gelau, C. (2005). Peripheral detection as a workload measure in driving: Effects of traffic complexity and route guidance system use in a driving study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 255-275.
18.
Jamson, A.H., & Merat, N. (2005). Surrogate in vehicle information systems and behaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 79-96.
19.
Lee, Y.-C., Lee, J.D., & Boyle, L.N. (2007). Visual attention in driving: The effects of cognitive load and visual disruption. Human Factors, 49, 721-733.
20.
Lesch, M.F., & Hancock, P.A. (2003). Driving performance during concurrent cell-phone use: Are drivers aware of their performance decrements? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 471-480.
21.
Martens, M., & van Winsum, W. (1999). Activation criteria and warning strategies: Driving simulator results (IN-ARTE Project, Tech. Rep. TR4014, ID 7.1). Soesterberg, Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Institute.
22.
Miura, T. (1986). Coping with situational demands: A study of eye movements and peripheral vision performance InA. G. Gale (Ed.), Vision in vehicles (pp. 205-216). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
23.
Neale, V.L., Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Sudweeks, J., & Goodman, M. (2005). An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings. Retrieved September 25, 2007, from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Web site, http://www.-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-12/100Car_ESV05summary.pdf
24.
Ogden, G.D., Levine, J.M., & Eisner, E.J. (1979). Measurement of workload by secondary tasks. Human Factors, 21, 529-548.
25.
Olsson, S., & Burns, P.C. (2000). Measuring driver visual distraction with a peripheral detection task. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University.
26.
Östlund, J., Nilsson, L., Carsten, O., Merat, N., Jamson, H., Jamson, S., et al. (2004). HMI and safety-related driver performance (HASTE Project Deliverable 2, European Commission, Project No. GRD1/ 2000/25361). Leeds, UK: University of Leeds. Available from http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/haste/deliverable.htm
27.
Patten, C., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2003). Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention , 36, 341-350.
28.
Ranney, T.A., Mazae, E., Garrot, R., & Goodman, M.J. (2000). NHTSA driver distraction research: Past, present, and future. Retrieved September 25, 2007, from http://www.-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/PDF/233.PDF
29.
Recarte, M., & Nunes, L. (2000). Effects of verbal and spatial imagery task on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 31-43.
30.
Recarte, M., & Nunes, L. (2003). Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 119-137.
31.
Sklar, A.E., & Sarter, N.B. (1999). Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domain . Human Factors, 41, 543-552.
32.
Spence, C., & Squire, S. (2003). Multisensory integration: Maintaining the perception of synchrony. Current Biology, 13, R519-R521.
33.
Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A., & Johnston, W.A. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-32.
34.
Strayer, D.L., & Johnston, W.A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone . Psychological Science, 12, 462-466.
35.
van Winsum, W., & Hoedemaeker, M. (2000). A road test of a prototype satellite system for in-vehicle menu control (Tech. Rep. TM-00-C003). Soesterberg, Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Institute .
36.
van Winsum, W., Martens, M., & Herland, L. (1999). The effects of speech versus tactile driver support messages on workload, driver behaviour and user acceptance (Tech. Rep. TM-99-C043) . Soesterberg, Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Institute.
37.
Verwey, W.B., & Veltman, H.A. (1996). Detecting short periods of elevated workload: A comparison of nine workload assessment techniques. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 270-285.
38.
Victor, T.W., Harbluk, J.A., & Engström, J.L. (2005). Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 167-190.
39.
Wickens, C.D. (2001). Attention to safety and the psychology of surprise . In Proceedings of the 2001 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (n.p.). Columbus: Ohio State University.
40.
Wickens, C.D., & Hollands, J.G. (2000). Complex systems, process control, and automation. In C. D. Wickens & J. G. Hollands (Eds.), Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed., pp. 538-550). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
Williams, L.J. (1985). Tunnel vision induced by a foveal load manipulation . Human Factors, 27, 221-227.
42.
Zeitlin, L.B. (1995). Estimates of driver mental workload: A long-term field trial of two subsidiary tasks. Human Factors, 37, 611-621.
