Objective: We studied the relation between dynamic (isokinetic) strength and the batch-assorting strategy to initiate a manual materials-handling task and the effect of knowledge of strength on that relation. Background: The debated, complex relationship between muscular strength and the risk of injury can be better understood from a behavioral perspective by examining performance strategies in physical acts such as lifting. Methods: Thirty-two participants (16 men and 16 women) were first tested for their isokinetic strengths of trunk extension, knee extension, shoulder extension, and shoulder abduction. The participants were then divided into two groups, one provided with knowledge feedback of their strength testing results and the other not provided with such feedback. Participants subsequently performed the same load-handling task in which they carried batches of various weight plates while allowed to assort batches of more than one plate into any combination. Results: Dynamic strength, as represented by a total isokinetic strength score, and knowledge feedback both had significant effects on measures quantifying the batch-assorting strategy. Conclusion: Individuals with greater strength tended to adopt a strategy corresponding to a heavier load per carry and fewer carries per batch. Receiving knowledge feedback evoked a tendency toward handling a heavier load, and this tendency was more salient in the weaker individuals. Application: Potential applications include the use of strength testing in worker selection and training as well as in job design to promote better strategies of balancing productivity and injury prevention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
Brownsword, A.W. (1987). It takes all types. San Bernardino , CA: HRM Press.
3.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Table R70: Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work by event or exposure leading to injury or illness and number of days away from work, 2002. Retrieved March 2, 2005, from http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/ostb1337.pdf
4.
Cady, L.D., Bischoff, D.P., O'Connel, E.R., Thomas, P.C., & Allan, J.H. (1979). Strength and fitness and subsequent back injuries in fire-fighters. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 21, 269-272.
Chaffin, D.B., Herrin, G.D., Keyserling, W.M., & Foulke, J.A. (1977). Pre-employment strength testing. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Physiology and Ergonomics Branch.
7.
Chaffin, D.B., & Park, K.S. (1973). A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 34, 513-525.
8.
Ciriello, V.M., & Snook, S.H. (1983). A study of size, distance, height, and frequency effects on manual handling tasks. Human Factors, 25, 473-483.
9.
Dunn, K., & Dawson, E. (1994). The right person for the job. Occupational Health and Safety Canada, 10, 28-30.
10.
Dvir, Z. (2004). Isokinetics: Muscle testing, interpretation and clinical applications. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
11.
Genaidy, A.M., Karwowski, W., Christensen, D.M., Vogiatzis, C., Deraiseh, N., & Prins, A. (1998). What is `heavy'? Ergonomics, 41, 420-432.
12.
Genaidy, A.M., Karwowski, W., Guo, L., Hidalgo, J., & Garbutt, G. (1992). Physical training: A tool for increasing work tolerance limits of employees engaged in manual handling tasks. Ergonomics, 35, 1081-1102.
13.
Herrin, G.D., Chaffin, D.B., & Mach, R.S. (1974). Criteria for research on the hazards of manual materials handling. In Workshop on Contract CDC-99-74118 (Tech. Rep.). Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
14.
Jackson, A.S., & Sekula, B.K. (1999). The influence of strength and gender on psychophysical lift capacity. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 723-727). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
15.
Karp, A.H. (2001, April). Getting started with PROC LOGISTIC. Presented at SAS Users Group International Conference, Long Beach, CA.
16.
Karwowski, W., Lee, W.G., Jamaldin, B., Gaddie, P., Jang, R.L., & Alqesaimi, K.K. (1999). Beyond psychophysics: The need for a cognitive engineering approach to setting limits in manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 42, 40-60.
17.
Karwowski, W., & Yates, J.W. (1986). Reliability of the psychophysical approach to manual lifting of liquids by females. Ergonomics, 29, 237-248.
18.
Kopelman, R. (1986). Managing productivity in organizations: A practical, people-oriented perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Mital, A. (1987). Patterns of differences between the maximum weights of lift acceptable to experienced and inexperienced materials handlers. Ergonomics, 30, 1137-1147.
20.
Newton, M., & Waddell, G. (1993). Trunk strength testing with iso-machines: Part 1. Review of a decade of scientific evidence. Spine, 18, 801-811.
21.
Nicholson, L.M., & Legg, S.J. (1986). A psychophysical study of the effects of load and frequency upon selection of workload in repetitive lifting. Ergonomics, 29, 903-911.
22.
Parcell,A.C., Sawyer, R.D., Tricoli, V.A., & Chinevere, T.D. (2002). Minimum rest period for strength recovery during a common isokinetic protocol. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34, 1018-1022.
23.
Perrin, D.H. (1993). Isokinetic exercise and assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
24.
Ryan, A.M., Greguras, G.J., & Ployhart, R.E. (1996). Perceived job relatedness of physical ability testing for firefighters: Exploring variations in reactions . Human Performance, 9, 219-240.
25.
Shewokis, P.A., Kennedy, C.Z., & Marsh, J.L. (2000). Effects of bandwidth knowledge of results on performance and learning of a shoulder internal rotation strength task. Isokinetics and Exercise Science, 8, 129-139.
26.
Stokes, M.E., Davis, C.S., & Koch, G.G. (1995). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system . Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
