Effects of Vision and Friction on Haptic Perception

Abstract

Objective: Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of vision and masking friction on contact perception and compliance differentiation thresholds in a simulated tissue-probing task. Background: In minimally invasive surgery, the surgeon receives limited haptic feedback because of the current design of the instrumentation and relies on visual feedback to judge the amount of force applied to the tissues. It is suggested that friction forces inherent in the instruments contribute to errors in surgeons' haptic perception. This paper investigated the psychophysics of contact detection and cross-modal sensory processing in the context of minimally invasive surgery. Method: A within-subjects repeated measures design was used, with friction, vision, tissue softness, and order of presentation as independent factors, and applied force, detection time, error, and confidence as dependent measures. Eight participants took part in each experiment, with data recorded by a custom force-sensing system. Results: In both detection and differentiation tasks, higher thresholds, longer detection times, and more errors were observed when vision was not available. The effect was more pronounced when haptic feedback was masked by friction forces in the surgical device (p < .05). Conclusion: Visual and haptic feedback were equally important for tissue compliance differentiation. Application: A frictionless endoscopic instrument can be designed to restore critical haptic information to surgeons without having to create haptic feedback artificially.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamsen, S. , Hansen, O.H. , Funch-Jensen, P. , Schulze, S. , Stage, J. G. , & Wara, P. (1997). Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective nationwide series. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 184, 571–578.

Archer, S. B. , Brown, D. W. , Smith, C. D. , Branum, G. D. , & Hunter, J. G. (2001). Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a national survey. Annals of Surgery, 234, 549–559.

Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5–28.

Bicchi, A. , Canepa, G. , De Rossi, D. , Iacconi, P. , & Scilingo, E. P. (1996). A sensorized minimally invasive surgery tool for detecting tissutal elastic properties. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 884–888). Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Boff, K. R. , & Lincoln, J. E. , editors (1988). Vibrotactile stimulation: Detectability of intensity differences. In Engineering data compendium: Human perception and performance (pp. 730–731). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

Hugh, T. B. (2002). New strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury—Surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery, 132, 826–835.

Klatzky, R. L. , Lederman S. J. , & Matula, D. E. (1993). Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 726–743.

MacFarlane, M. , Rosen, J. , Hannaford, B. , Pellegrini, C. , & Sinanan, M. (1999). Force feedback grasper helps restore the sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 3, 278–285.

Papadopoulos, E., Vlachos, K., & Mitropoulos, D. (2002). Design of a 5-dof haptic simulator for urological operations. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from http://nereus.mech.ntua.gr/pdf_ps/icra02.pdf.

10.

Smyth, M. M. , & Pendleton, L. R. (1990). Space and movement in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 291–304.

11.

Smyth, M. M. , & Waller, A. (1998). Movement imagery in rock climbing: Patterns of interference from visual, spatial, and kinesthetic secondary tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 145–157.

12.

Strasberg, S. M. , Hertl, M. , & Soper, N. J. (1995). An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 180, 101–125.

13.

Traverso, L. W. (1999). Risk factors for intraoperative injury during cholecystectomy: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Annals of Surgery, 229, 458–459.

14.

Wagner, C. R. , Stylopoulos, N. , & Howe, R. D. (2002). The role of force feedback in surgery: Analysis of blunt dissection. In Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (pp. 68–74). Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

15.

Way, L. W. , Stewart, L. , Gantert, W. , Kingsway, L. , Lee, C. M. , Whang, K., et al. (2003). Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries—Analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Annals of Surgery, 237, 460–469.

16.

Woodin, M. E. , & Heil, J. (1996). Skilled motor performance and working memory in rowers: Body patterns and spatial positions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 357–358.