Objective: We provide a review and analysis of much of the published literature on visual perception issues that impact the design and use of head-mounted displays (HMDs). Background: Unlike the previous literature on HMDs, this review draws heavily from the basic vision literature in order to help provide insight for future design solutions for HMDs. Method: Included in this review are articles and books found cited in other works as well as articles and books obtained from an Internet search. Results: Issues discussed include the effect of brightness and contrast on depth of field, dark focus, dark ergence, and perceptual constancy; the effect of accommodation-vergence synergy on perceptual constancy, eyestrain, and discomfort; the relationship of field of view to the functioning of different visual pathways and the types of visual motor tasks mediated by them; the relationship of binocular input to visual suppression; and the importance of head movements, head tracking, and display update lag. Conclusion: This paper offers a set of recommendations for the design and use of HMDs. Application: Consideration of the basic vision literature will provide insight for future design solutions for HMDs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, R. S., Howard, I. P., & Zacher, J. E.. (1999). Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room. Perception, 28, 299–306.
2.
Anand, S., & Bridgeman, B.. (2002). An unbiased measure of the contributions of chroma and luminance to saccadic suppression of displacement. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 335–341.
3.
Anderson, G., Vrana, C., Riegler, J., & Martin, E.. (2002). Integration of a legacy system with NVTS (Tech. Rep. AFRL-HE-AZ-TR-2002-0069). Ft. Belvoir, VA: Air Force Research Laboratory.
4.
Benson, A. J., & Barnes, G. R.. (1978). Vision during angular oscillation: The dynamic interaction of visual and vestibular mechanisms. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 49, 340–345.
5.
Blake, R. R.. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145–167.
6.
Blake, R. R., & Boothroyd, K.. (1985). The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 114–124.
7.
Breese, B. B.. (1899). On inhibition. Psychological Monographs, 3, 1–65.
8.
Brickner, M. S., & Foyle, D. C.. (1990). Field of view effects on a simulated flight task with head-down and head-up sensor imagery displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 1567–1571). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9.
Burr, D. C., Morrone, C., & Ross, J.. (2002). Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature, 371, 511–513.
10.
Campbell, F. W.. (1957). The depth of field of the human eye. Optica Acta, 4, 157–164.
11.
Campbell, F. W., & Westheimer, G.. (1960). Dynamics of accommodation responses of the human eye. Journal of Physiology, 151, 285–295.
12.
Cho, S., & Lee, C.. (2003). Expansion of visual space after saccadic eye movements. Journal of Vision, 3, 906–918.
13.
Clapp, R. E.. (1987). Field of view, resolution, and brightness parameters for eye limited displays. In C. Freeman (Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE: Imaging sensors and displays(Vol. 0765, pp. 10–18). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
14.
Davis, E. T.. (1997). Visual requirements in HMDs: What can we see and what do we need to see? In J. E. Melzer & K. Moffitt (Eds.), Head mounted displays: Designing for the user(pp. 207–248). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Diamond, M. R., Ross, J., & Morrone, M. C.. (2000). Extraretinal control of saccadic suppression. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3449–3455.
16.
Draper, M., Viirre, E.S., Furness, T. A., & Gawron, V.. (2001). Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43, 129–146.
17.
Draper, M., Viirre, E.S., Furness, T. A., & Parker, D. E. (1997, May). Theorized relationship between vestibulo-ocular adaptation and simulator sickness in virtual environments. Presented at the International Workshop on Motion Sickness, Marbella, Spain.
18.
Duh, H. B.-L., Lin, J. J. W., Kenyon, R. V., Parker, D. E., & Furness, T. A.. (2001). Effects of field of view on balance in an immersive environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality(pp. 235–240). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
19.
Edgar, G. K., Pope, J. C., & Craig, I.. (1993). Visual accommodation problems with head-up and helmet mounted displays. In C. T. Bartlett & M. D. Cowan (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Display systems: High-resolution and large screen displays and helmet, head-up, and head-down displays (Vol. 1988, pp. 100–107). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
20.
Ehrlich, J.. (1997). Simulator sickness and HMD configurations. In M. R. Stein (Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE: Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies IV (Vol. 3206, pp. 170–178). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
21.
Ellis, S. R., Bucher, U. J., & Menges, B. M.. (1995). The relationship of binocular convergence and errors in judged distance to virtual objects. In Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control (pp. 1–8). Boston, MA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
22.
Epstein, W.. (1997). Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley.
23.
Fisher, R. E.. (1994). Optics for head-mounted displays. Information Display, 10(7-8), 12–16.
24.
Ferrin, F. J.. (1991). Survey of helmet tracking technologies. In H. M. Assenheim, K. A. Flasck, T. M. Lippert, & J. Bentz (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Large screen projection, avionic, and helmet-mounted displays (Vol. 1456, pp. 86–94). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
25.
Foley, J. M., Ribeiro-Filho, N. P., & Da Silva, J. A.. (2004). Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space. Vision Research, 44, 147–156.
26.
Frey, T. W., & Page, H. J.. (2001). Virtual HUD using an HMD. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, H. J. Girolamo, & C. E. Rash (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays VI(Vol. 4361, pp. 251–262). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
27.
Gleason, G. A., & Kenyon, R. V.. (1997). The Mandelbaum effect may not be due to involuntary mis-accommodation [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, S983.
28.
Grigby, S. S., & Tsou, B. H.. (1994). Visual processing and partial-overlap head-mounted displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 2, 69–74.
29.
Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R.. (2001). Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research, 41, 1475–1482.
30.
Grossman, E. D., Donnelly, M., Price, P., Morgan, V., Pickens, D., Neighbor, G., et al..2000). Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 711–720.
31.
Grunwald, A. J., & Kohn, S.. (1994). Visual field information in low-altitude visual flight and line-of-sight slaved helmet-mounted displays. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, 120–134.
32.
Hakkinen, J. (2003, September 9). Ergonomics of head-worn virtual displays. Nokia Research and Venturing, pp. 1-4.
33.
Hakkinen, J.. (2004). A virtual display for mobile use. In Society for Information Display international symposium digest of technical papers, Vol. 35 (pp. 1586–1589). San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display.
34.
Havig, P. R., Grigsby, S. S., Heft, E. L., LaCreta, J. M., & Post, D. L.. (2001). Luminance contrast and color recognition in helmetmounted displays. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, H. J. Girolamo, & C. E. Rash (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays VI (Vol. 4361, pp. 198–203). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
35.
Hennessy, R. T., Iida, T., Shina, K., & Leibowitz, H. W.. (1976). The effect of pupil size on accommodation. Vision Research, 16, 587–589.
36.
Howard, I. P.. (2002). Seeing in depth: Vol. 1. Basic mechanisms.New York: Porteous.
37.
Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J.. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J.. (2002). Seeing in depth: Vol. 2. Depth perception.New York: Porteous.
39.
Huddleston, J. H. F.. (1970). Tracking performance on a visual display apparently vibrating at one to ten Hertz. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 401–408.
40.
Ivanoff, A.. (1955). Night binocular convergence and night myopia. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 45, 769–770.
41.
Jagacinski, R. J., & Flach, J. M.. (2003). Control theory for humans: Quantitative approaches to modeling performance.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
Jennings, S., & Craig, G.. (2000). Effects of field-of-view on pilot performance in night vision goggles flight trials: Preliminary findings. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays V (Vol. 4021, pp. 335–342). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
43.
Johnson, C. A.. (1976). Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 66, 138–142.
44.
Keller, K., & Colucci, D.. (1998). Perception in HMDs: What is it in head mounted displays (HMDs) that really make them all so terrible? In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays III (Vol. 3362, pp. 46–53). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
45.
Kenyon, R. V., & Kneller, E. W.. (1993). The effects of field of view size on the control of roll motion. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23, 183–193.
46.
Klymenko, V., Harding, T.H., Beasley, H. H., & Martin, J. S.. (1999). The effect of helmet mounted display field of view configurations on target acquisition (Tech. Rep. No. 99-19). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
47.
Klymenko, V., Verona, R.W., Martin, J. S., & Beasley, H. H. (1994a). Convergent and divergent viewing affect luning, visual thresholds, and field of view fragmentation in partial binocular overlap helmet mounted displays. In R. J. Lewandowski, W. Stephens, & L. A. Haworth (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays and symbology design requirements(Vol. 2218, pp. 82–96). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
48.
Klymenko, V., Verona, R.W., Martin, J. S., & Beasley, H. H. (1994b). Factors affecting the perception of luning in monocular regions of partial binocular overlap displays(Tech. Rep. No. 94-47). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
49.
Kooi, F.. (1997). Visual strain: A comparison of monitors and headmounted displays. In J. Bares et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Imaging sciences and display technologies(Vol. 2949, pp. 162–171). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
50.
Kruk, R., & Longridge, T.. (1984). Binocular overlap in a fiber optic helmet mounted display. In Proceedings of the 1984 Image Conference III(pp. 363–378). CSA, Bethesda, MD: The IMAGE Society.
51.
Kruk, R., & Runnings, D.. (1989). Low level flight performance and air combat maneuvering performance in a simulator with a fiber optic helmet mounted display system. In Proceedings of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Conference (pp. 1989–1992). CSA, Bethesda, MD: The IMAGE Society.
52.
Laramee, R., & Ware, C.. (2002). Rivalry and interference with a headmounted display. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9(3), 238–251.
53.
Lee, R. A., & King, A. I.. (1971). Visual vibration response. Journal of Applied Physiology, 30, 281–286.
54.
Leibowitz, H. W., & Owens, D. A. (1975a). Anomalous myopias and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. Science, 189, 646–648.
55.
Leibowitz, H. W., & Owens, D. A. (1975b). Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 65, 1121–1128.
56.
Levelt, W. J. M.. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, Netherlands: Institute for Perception, RVO-TNO.
57.
Licina, J. R., Rash, C. E., Mora, J. C., & Ledford, M. H.. (1999). Helmetmounted display human factors engineering design issues: Past, present, and future. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays IV(Vol. 3689, pp. 32–43). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
58.
Lin, J. J.-W., Duh, H. B. L., Parker, D. E., Abi-Rached, H., & Furness, T. A.. (2002). Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality(pp. 164–171). Los Alamitos, CA: Conference Publishing Service.
59.
Lindholm, J., Pierce, B., & Scharine, A.. (2001). Liquid-crystal displays and moving-image quality. In Proceedings of the 2001 Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (pp. 1–9). Arlington, VA: National Training Systems Association.
60.
Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H.. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740–749.
61.
Ljung, L., Morf, M., & Falconer, D.. (1978). Fast calculation of gain matrices for recursive estimation schemes. International Journal of Control, 27, 1–19.
62.
Long, J., & Wickens, C.D.. (1994). Conformal versus non-conformal symbology and the head-up display. In R. J. Lewandowski, W. Stephens, & L. A. Haworth (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet-and head-mounted displays and symbology design requirements (Vol. 2218, pp. 361–368). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
63.
Mack, A., & Rock, I.. (1998). Inattentional blindness.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I.. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475–501.
65.
Martinsen, G. L., Havig, P. R., & Post, D.L.. (2003). Human factors requirements of helmet trackers for HMDs. In C. E. Rash & C. E. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays VIII(Vol. 5079, pp. 95–103). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
66.
McKee, S. P., & Welch, L.. (1989). Is there a constancy for velocity?Vision Research, 29, 553–561.
67.
Melzer, J. E.. (1998). Overcoming the field of view: Resolution invariant in head mounted displays. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and headmounted displays III(Vol. 3362, pp. 284–293). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
68.
Melzer, J. E., & Moffitt, K.. (1991). An ecological approach to partial binocular overlap. In H. M. Assenheim, K. A. Flasck, T. M. Lippert, & J. Bentz (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Large screen projection, avionics, and helmet-mounted displays(Vol. 1456, pp. 124–131). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
69.
Melzer, J. E., & Moffitt, K.. (1997). HMD design - Putting the user first. In J. E. Melzer & K. Moffitt (Eds.), Head mounted displays: Designing for the user (pp. 1–16). New York: McGraw-Hill.
70.
Meng, X., Chen, Y., & Qian, N.. (2004). Both monocular and binocular signals contribute to motion rivalry. Vision Research, 44, 45–55.
71.
Merhav, S. J., & Velger, M.. (1991). Compensating sampling errors in the stabilization of helmet-mounted displays using auxiliary acceleration measurements. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14, 1067–1069.
72.
Meyer, K., Applewhite, H.L., & Biocca, F.A.. (1992). Asurvey of position trackers. Presence, 1, 173–200.
73.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A.. (1995). The visual brain in action.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
Mon-Williams, M., Wann, J. P., & Ruston, S.. (1993). Binocular vision in a virtual world: Visual deficits following the wearing of a headmounted display. Ophthalmology and Physiological Optics, 13, 387–391.
75.
Morphew, M., Shively, J., & Casey, D.. (2004). Helmet mounted displays for unmanned aerial vehicle control. In C. E. Rash & C. E. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays IX: Technologies and applications (Vol. 5442, pp. 93–103). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
76.
Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S.. (1990). Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research, 30, 1811–1825.
77.
Norman, H. F., Norman, J. F., & Bilotta, J.. (2000). The temporal course of suppression during binocular rivalry. Perception, 29, 831–841.
78.
Ogle, K. N.. (1938). Induced size effect: I. Anew phenomenon in binocular space-perception associated with the relative sizes of the images of the two eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology, 20, 604–623.
79.
Ogle, K. N., & Schwartz, J. T.. (1959). Depth of focus of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 49, 273–280.
80.
Olano, M., Cohen, J., Mine, M., & Bishop, G.. (1995). Combating rendering latency. In Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (pp. 19–21). New York: ACM Press.
81.
Ono, H., & Comerford, T.. (1977). Stereoscopic depth constancy. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 91–128). New York: Wiley.
82.
Osgood, R. K., & Wells, M. J.. (1991). The effect of field-of-view size on performance of a simulated air-to-ground night attack. In AGARD Symposium on Helmet Mounted Displays and Night Vision Goggles (AGARD Conference Proceedings 517, pp. 10.1–10.7). CSA, Bethesda, MD: The Image Society.
83.
Owens, D. A.. (1979). The Mandelbaum effect: Evidence for an accommodative bias toward intermediate viewing distances. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 646–652.
84.
Owens, D. A., & Leibowitz, H. W.. (1976). Oculomotor adjustments in darkness and the specific distance tendency. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 2–9.
85.
Owens, D. A., & Leibowitz, H. W.. (1980). Accommodation, convergence, and distance perception in low illumination. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 57, 540–550.
86.
Padmos, P., & Milders, M.V.. (1992). Quality criteria for simulator images: A literature review. Human Factors, 34, 727–748.
87.
Palmer, J.. (1999). Vision science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88.
Patterson, R., & Martin, W.L.. (1992). Human stereopsis. Human Factors, 34, 669–692.
89.
Patterson, R., Moe, L., & Hewitt, T.. (1992). Factors that affect depth perception in stereoscopic displays. Human Factors, 34, 655–667.
90.
Peli, E.. (1990). Visual issues in the use of a head-mounted monocular display. Optical Engineering, 29, 883–892.
91.
Peli, E.. (1998). The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Research, 38, 2053–2066.
92.
Peuskens, H., Sunaert, S., Dupont, P., Van Hecke, P., & Orban, G. A.. (2001). Human brain regions involved in heading estimation. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2451–2461.
93.
Pierce, B. J., Arrington, K. F., & Moreno, M. A.. (1999). Motion and stereoscopic tilt perception. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 3, 193–206.
94.
Pierce, B. J., & Geri, G. A.. (1997). Changes in perceived velocity with viewing distance [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38 (Suppl.), S379.
95.
Pierce, B. J., & Howard, I. P.. (1997). Types of size disparity and the perception of surface slant. Perception, 26, 1503–1517.
96.
Primeau, G.. (2000). Wide field-of-view SVGA sequential color HMD for use in anthropomorphic telepresence applications. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays V (Vol. 4021, pp. 11–19). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
97.
Rash, C. E., Kalich, M. E., & van de Pol, C.. (2002). Solutions to helmetmounted display visual correction compatibility issues. In C. E. Rash & C. E. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and headmounted displays VII(Vol. 4711, pp. 270–285). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
98.
Rash, C. E., McLean, W., Mora, J., Ledford, M., Mozo, B., Licina, J., et al.. (1998). Design issues for helmet-mounted display systems for rotary wing aviation(Tech. Rep. No. 98-32). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
99.
Rash, C. E., Mozo, B. T., McEntire, B. J., & Licina, J. R.. (1996). RAH-66 Comanche health hazard and performance issues for the helmet integrated display and sighting system(Tech. Rep. 97-1). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
100.
Rensink, R., O'Regan, J., & Clark, J.. (1995). Image flicker is as good as saccades in making large scene changes invisible. Perception, 24(Suppl.), 26–27.
101.
Ritter, M.. (1977). Effect of disparity and viewing distance on perceived depth. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 400–407.
102.
Robinson, G. H., Koth, B. W., & Ringenbach, J. P.. (1976). Dynamics of the eye and head during an element of visual search. Ergonomics, 19, 691–709.
103.
Rock, I., Linnett, C., Grant, P., & Mack, A.. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502–534.
104.
Rock, I., & Mack, A.. (1994). Attention and perceptual organization. In S. Ballesteros (Ed.), Cognitive approaches to human perception (pp. 23–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
105.
Rogers, P. J., & Freeman, M. H.. (1992). Biocular display optics. In M. A. Karim (Ed.), Electro-optical displays(pp. 417–447). New York: Marcel Dekker.
106.
Rogers, S. P., Asbury, C. N., & Szoboszlay, Z. P.. (2003). Enhanced flight symbology for wide field-of-view helmet-mounted displays. In C. E. Rash & C. E. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet-and head-mounted displays VIII: Technologies and applications (Vol. 5079, pp. 321–331). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
107.
Rolland, J., Ha, Y., & Fidopiastis, C.. (2004). Albertian errors in headmounted displays: I. Choice of eye-point location for a near-or far-field task visualization. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 21, 901–912.
108.
Roska, B., Nemeth, E., Orzo, L., & Werblin, F.S.. (2000). Three levels of lateral inhibition: A space-time study of the retina of the tiger salamander. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1941–1951.
109.
Ruston, S., Mon-Williams, M., & Wann, J. P.. (1994). Binocular vision in a bi-ocular world: New-generation head-mounted displays avoid causing visual deficit. Displays, 15, 255–260.
110.
Schall, J. D., Nawrot, M., Blake, R., & Yu, K.. (1993). Visual guided attention is neutralized when informative cues are visible but unperceived. Vision Research, 33, 2057–2064.
111.
Schiller, P. H., Logothetis, N. K., & Charles, E. R.. (1990). Role of the color opponent and broad-band channels in vision. Visual Neuroscience, 5, 321–346.
112.
Sheedy, J., & Bergstrom, N.. (2002). Performance and comfort on near-eye computer displays. Optometry and Vision Science, 79, 306–312.
113.
Shibata, T.. (2002). Head mounted display. Displays, 23, 57–64.
114.
So, R. H. Y., & Griffin, M. J.. (1992). Compensation lags in head-coupled displays using head position prediction and image deflection. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 29, 1064–1068.
115.
Thiele, A., Henning, P., Kubischik, M., & Hoffmann, K.P.. (2002). Neural mechanisms of saccadic suppression. Science, 295, 2460–2462.
116.
Thilo, K. V., Santoro, L., Walsh, V., & Blakemore, C.. (2004). The site of saccadic suppression. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 13–14.
117.
Toates, F. M.. (1972). Accommodation function of the human eye. Physiological Reviews, 52, 828–863.
118.
Toates, F. M.. (1974). Vergence eye movements. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 37, 153–214.
119.
T'so, D. Y., & Roe, A. W.. (1995). Functional compartments in visual cortex: Segregation and interaction. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 325–337). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
120.
Tsou, B. H., & Shenker, M.. (2000). Visual factors associated with headmounted displays. In M. Bass (Ed.), Handbook of optics: Vol. III. Visual optics: Issues pertinent to the optical designer (2nd ed., pp. 18.1–18.15). New York: McGraw-Hill.
121.
Van Essen, D. C., & DeYoe, E. A.. (1995). Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 383–400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
122.
Velger, M.. (1998). Helmet-mounted displays and sights.Boston, MA: Artech House.
123.
von Hofsten, C.. (1976). The role of convergence in visual space perception. Vision Research, 16, 193–198.
124.
Wallach, H.. (1939). On constancy of visual speed. Psychological Review, 46, 541–552.
125.
Wann, J. P., Ruston, S., & Mon-Williams, M.. (1995). Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35, 2731–2736.
126.
Weikhorst, L., & Vacarro, F.. (1988). Field of view utilized in performing tactical maneuvers (Tech. Rep. AFHRL-TP-87-50). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
127.
Wells, M. J., & Griffin, M. J.. (1984). Benefits of helmet-mounted display image stabilization under whole-body vibration. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 55, 13–18.
128.
Wells, M. J., & Griffin, M. J. (1987a). Flight trial of a helmet-mounted display image stabilization system. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 55, 319–322.
129.
Wells, M. J., & Griffin, M. J. (1987b). A review and investigation of aiming and tracking performance with helmet-mounted sights. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-17, 210–221.
130.
Wells, M. J., & Griffin, M. J.. (1988). Tracking with the head during whole-body vibration. In J. Patrick & K. D. Duncan (Eds.), Training, human decision making and control (pp. 323–333). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science (North-Holland).
131.
Wells, M. J., & Haas, M. W.. (1990). Head movements during simulated air-to-air engagements. In R. R. Lewandowski (Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet-mounted displays II(Vol. 1290, pp. 246–257). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
132.
Wenzel, B., Castillo, A., & Baker, G.. (2002). Assessment of the virtual environment safe-for-maintenance trainer (VEST) (Tech. Rep. No. AFRL-HE-AZ-TP-2002-0011). Mesa, AZ: Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Warfighter Training Research Division.
133.
Wetzel, P. A., Pierce, B. J., & Geri, G. A.. (1996). Viewing distance and the perceived size of simulator imagery. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 4, 247–253.
134.
Winterbottom, M. D., Geri, G. A., & Pierce, B. J.. (2004). An integrated procedure for measuring the spatial and temporal resolution of visual displays. In Proceedings of the 2004 Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference(pp. 1855:1–8). Arlington, VA: National Training System Association.
135.
Wood, R. B.. (1992). Holographic head-up displays. In M. A. Karim (Ed.), Electro-optical displays (pp. 337–415). New York: Marcel Dekker.
136.
Yabuta, N. H., Sawatari, A., & Callaway, E. M.. (2001). Two functional channels from primary visual cortex to dorsal visual cortical areas. Science, 292, 297–300.
137.
Young, P.. (1976). Some observations on instrumental variable methods of time series analysis. International Journal of Control, 23, 593–612.
138.
Zohary, E., & Sittig, A.. (1993). Mechanisms of velocity constancy. Vision Research, 33, 2467–2478.
