A Model of Extended,Semisystematic Visual Search

Abstract

Objective: A model of semisystematic search was sought that could account for both memory retrieval and other performance-shaping factors. Background: Visual search is an important aspect of many examination and monitoring tasks. As a result, visual search performance has been the topic of many empirical investigations. These investigations have reported that individual search performance depends on participant factors such as search behavior, which has motivated the development of models of visual search that incorporate this behavior. Search behavior ranges from random to strictly systematic; variation in behavior is commonly assumed to be caused by differences in memory retrieval and search strategy. Methods: This model ultimately took the form of a discrete-time nonstationary Markov process. Results: It yields both performance and process measures that include accuracy, time to perception, task time, and coverage while avoiding the statistical difficulties inherent to simulations. In particular, it was seen that as the search behavior becomes more systematic, expected coverage and accuracy increase while expected task time decreases. Conclusion: In addition to explaining these outcomes and their interrelationships from a theoretical standpoint, the model can predict these outcomes in practice to a certain extent as it can create an envelope defined by best- and worst-case search performance. Application: The model also has the capability of supporting assessment. That is, it can be used to assess the effectiveness of an individual's search performance, and to provide possible explanations for this performance, through the use of one or more of the output measures.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arani, T. , Karwan, M.H. , & Drury, C. G. (1984). A variable-memory model of visual search. Human Factors, 26, 631–639.

Baveja, A. , Drury, C.G. , Karwan, M. H. , & Malon, D. M. (1996). Derivation and test of an optimum overlapping-lobes model of visual search. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 26, 161–168.

Courtney, A. J. , & Guan, L. (1996). Visual performance with complete and incomplete visual lobe areas. Ergonomics, 39, 749–756.

Courtney, A. J. , & Guan, L. (1998). Assessing search performance with a simulation model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 8, 251–263.

Drury, C. G. , & Chi, C.-F. (1995). A test of economic models of stopping policy in visual search. IIE Transactions, 27, 382–393.

Eriksen, C. W. (1990). Attentional search of the visual field. In D. Brogan (Ed.), Visual search (pp. 3–19). London: Taylor & Francis.

Gramopadhye, A. K. , Drury, C. G. , & Prabhu, P. V. (1997). Training strategies for visual inspection. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 7, 171–196.

Karwan, M. H. , Morawski, T. B. , & Drury, C. G. (1995). Optimum speed of visual inspection using a systematic search strategy. IIE Transactions, 27, 291–299.

Krendel, E. S. , & Wodinsky, J. (1960). Visual search in unstructured fields. In A. Morris & E. P. Horne (Eds.), Visual search techniques (pp. 151–169). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

10.

Lin, T. (1991). A visual search model: The waiting time distribution of the number of fixations until detection. Naval Research Logistics, 38, 157–170.

11.

Megaw, E. D. , & Richardson, J. (1979). Target uncertainty and visual scanning strategies. Human Factors, 21, 303–315.

12.

Morawski, T. B. , Drury, C. G. , & Karwan, M. H. (1980). Predicting search performance for multiple targets. Human Factors, 22, 707–718.

13.

Morawski, T. B. , Drury, C. G. , & Karwan, M. H. (1992). The optimum speed of visual inspection using a random search strategy. IIE Transactions, 24, 122–133.

14.

Poulton, E. C. (1973). The effect of fatigue upon inspection work. Applied Ergonomics, 4, 73–83.

15.

Ross, S. (2003). Introduction to probability models (8th ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

16.

Sarac, A. , Batta, R. , & Drury, C.G. (1997). One dimensional overlapping systematic search with finite length defect. In Sixth Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 107–112). Norcross, GA: Institute of Industrial Engineers.

17.

Schoonard, J. W. , & Gould, J. D. (1973). Field of view and target uncertainty in visual search and inspection. Human Factors, 15, 33–42.

18.

Wang, M.-J. J. , Lin, S.-C. , & Drury, C. G. (1997). Training for strategy in visual search. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 101–108.

19.

Warner, H. D. , & Heimstra, N. W. (1972). Effects of noise intensity on visual target detection performance. Human Factors, 14, 181–185.

20.

Wiener, E. L. (1975). Studies on visual search. In C. G. Drury & J. G. Fox (Eds.), Human reliability in quality control (pp. 31–43). London: Taylor & Francis.

21.

Williams, L. G. (1966). Target conspicuity and visual search. Human Factors, 8, 80–92.

22.

Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202–238.