Objective: This paper describes an experiment directed toward refinement and initial field testing of two potential countermeasures for the problem of rear-end (RE) crashes. The countermeasures consist of “imminent warning” signals intended to direct the following driver's visual glance to the lead vehicle as it brakes rapidly to a stop and for a short time thereafter. Background: RE crashes are the most frequently occurring type of light vehicle crash, making up at least 25% of all crashes. Method: A preliminary experiment was conducted to facilitate improvement of the attention-getting capability of an alternating pair of lamps. In the main experiment, an oscillating narrow beam lamp (a promising candidate from a previous experiment) and an improved alternating pair (improved as compared with that in a previous experiment) were compared with ordinary rear lighting. Seventy-two drivers were purposely distracted by in-vehicle tasks as the lead (surrogate) vehicle braked hard. Results: Results showed improvements of 0.25 to 0.35 s in brake activation times for the two enhanced configurations as compared with ordinary rear lighting. Conclusion: The two enhanced lighting configurations show promise in reducing the number and severity of RE crashes. Application: The methods and results of this study can be applied to the future design and evaluation of automotive rear-end lighting designed to reduce RE crashes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
General Motors. (1997). Forty-four crashes, Version 3.0 (General Motors Rep.) Detroit, MI: Author.
2.
Kiefer, R., LeBlanc, D., Palmer, M., Salinger, J., Deering, R., & Shulman, M. (1999). Development and validation of functional definitions and evaluation procedures for collision warning/avoidance systems (NHTSA Rep. DOT-HS-808-964). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
3.
Knipling, R. R., Hendricks, D. L., Koziol, J. S., Allen, J. C., Tijerina, L., & Wilson, C. (1992). A front-end analysis of rear-end crashes. In Proceedings of the IVHS America 1992 Annual Meeting (Vol. 2. pp. 733–745). Washington, DC: IVHS America.
4.
Lee, S. E., Wierwille, W. W., & DeHart, M. C. (2003). The evolution of an enhanced rear signaling system. Transportation Research Record, 1843, 31–40.
5.
Lee, S. E., Wierwille, W. W., & Klauer, S. G. (2002). Enhanced rear lighting and signaling systems: Literature review and analyses of alternative system concepts(Task 1 Final Rep.;NHTSA Rep. DOTHS-809-425). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
6.
Misener, J. A., Tsao, H.-S. J., Song, B., & Steinfeld, A. (2000). The emergence of a cognitive car following driver model with applications to rear-end crashes with a stopped lead vehicle. Transportation Research Record, 1724, 92–38.
7.
Moore, D. W., & Rumar, K. (1999). Historical development and current effectiveness of rear lighting systems (Rep. UMTRI-99-31). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
8.
Mortimer, R. G. (1969). Dynamic evaluation of automobile rear lighting configurations(Highway Safety Research Institute Tech. Rep.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
9.
Mortimer, R. G. (1981). Field test evaluation of rear lighting deceleration signals: II. Field test (Final Rep. for NHTSA Contract DOT HS-6-01447). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
10.
Mortimer, R. G. (1997). Vehicle-driver communications to reduce rear-end collisions: What makes sense and why? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 849–853) Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
11.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1999a). Fatality Analysis Reporting System [Data file]. Downloadable from ftp://ftp.nhtsa.dot.gov/fars/1999/.
12.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1999b). General Estimates System [Data file]. Downloadable from ftp://ftp.nhtsa.dot.gov/ges/GES99/.
13.
Wiacek, C. J., & Najm, W. G. (1999). Driver/vehicle characteristics in rear-end pre-crash scenarios based on the General Estimates System (GES) (SAE Tech. Paper 1999-01-0817) Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
14.
Wierwille, W. W., Lee, S. E., & DeHart, M. C. (2003). Enhanced rear lighting and signaling systems: Testing and optimization of high level and stopped/slowly-moving vehicle rear signaling systems (Task 2 Final Rep.; NHTSA Rep. DOT-HS-809-597). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
15.
Wierwille, W. W., Lee, S. E., & DeHart, M. C. (2005). Project final report emphasizing Task 3 results: Test road experiment on high-level rear lighting (NHTSA Rep. DOT HS 809 864). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
