Objective: This study examined perceived time to collision (TTC) with automobile drivers under realistic approach, rear-end crash scenario conditions. Background: TTC refers to the time before impact if prevailing conditions continue. Method: In this test track study involving 51 drivers ranging from 20 to 70 years old, the driver's vision was occluded at either 3.6 or 5.6 s TTC during an in-lane approach to a lead vehicle. Drivers provided TTC estimates by pressing a button the instant they felt that they would have collided with the vehicle ahead. Results: Results indicated that TTC was consistently underestimated. The TTC ratio (perceived TTC/actual TTC) increased as driver speed decreased and as relative speed increased. These ratios were largely unaffected by age, gender, actual TTC, viewing time (1 s vs. continuous), and the presence of an eyes-forward, mental addition distraction task. Conclusion: Overall, these results suggest that under these low TTC conditions drivers estimate TTC in a relatively uniform fashion and that they are capable of providing this estimate based on a brief glimpse to the vehicle ahead. Application: These results are being used to develop an alert timing approach for a forward collision warning system intended to assist drivers in avoiding rear-end crashes with the vehicle ahead.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cavallo, V., & Laurent, M. (1988). Visual information in skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception, 17, 623–632.
2.
Cavallo, V., Mestre, D., & Berthelon, C. (1997). Time-to-collision judgments: Visual and spatio-temporal factors. In J. A. Rothengatter & E. J. Carbonell (Eds.), Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and application (pp. 97–111). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
3.
Evans, L., & Rothery, R. (1974). Detection of the sign of relative motion when following a vehicle. Human Factors, 16, 161–173.
4.
Groeger, J. (2000). Understanding driving: Applying cognitive psychology to a complex everyday driving task. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
5.
Groeger, J. A., & Comte, S. (1999). Time estimation in the time-tocollision task: The impact of a simultaneous secondary task. In A. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, C. M. Haslegrave, & S. P. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in vehicles VII (pp. 363–372). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6.
Hancock, P. A., & Manser, M. P. (1997). Time-to-contact: More than tau alone. Ecological Psychology, 9, 265–297.
7.
Hays, W. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt.
8.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
9.
Kiefer, R. J., Cassar, M. T., Flannagan, C. A., LeBlanc, D. L., Palmer, M., Deering, R. (2003). Refining the CAMP crash alert timing approach by examining “last-second” braking and lane-change maneuvers under various kinematic conditions (Rep. No. DOT-HS-809-574). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.
10.
Kiefer, R. J., LeBlanc, D. L., & Flannagan, C. A. (2005). Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 295–303.
11.
Kiefer, R. J., LeBlanc, D. L., Palmer, M., Salinger, J., Deering, R., & Shulman, M. (1999). Forward collision warning systems: Development and validation of functional definitions and evaluation procedures for collision warning/avoidance systems (Rep. No. DOT-HS-808-964). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.
12.
Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., & Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31, 617–623.
13.
Lee, D. N. (1976). Atheory of visual control of braking base on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437–459.
14.
McLeod, R., & Ross, H. (1983). Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception, 12, 417–423.
15.
Milgram. P. (1987). Aspectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 19, 449–456.
16.
Schiff, W., & Detwiler, M. (1979). Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8, 647–658.
17.
Summala, H., Lamble, D., & Laakso, M. (1998). Driving experience and perception of lead car's braking when looking at in-car targets. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 401–407.
18.
van der Horst, A. R. A. (1990). A time-based analysis of road user behavior in normal and critical encounters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands. (Available from the TNO Human Factors Research Institute, P.O. Box 23, 3769 Soesterberg, Netherlands)
19.
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
