Objective: The objective of this research was to determine the relative impairment associated with conversing on a cellular telephone while driving. Background: Epidemiological evidence suggests that the relative risk of being in a traffic accident while using a cell phone is similar to the hazard associated with driving with a blood alcohol level at the legal limit. The purpose of this research was to provide a direct comparison of the driving performance of a cell phone driver and a drunk driver in a controlled laboratory setting. Method: We used a high-fidelity driving simulator to compare the performance of cell phone drivers with drivers who were intoxicated from ethanol (i.e., blood alcohol concentration at 0.08% weight/volume). Results: When drivers were conversing on either a handheld or hands-free cell phone, their braking reactions were delayed and they were involved in more traffic accidents than when they were not conversing on a cell phone. By contrast, when drivers were intoxicated from ethanol they exhibited a more aggressive driving style, following closer to the vehicle immediately in front of them and applying more force while braking. Conclusion: When driving conditions and time on task were controlled for, the impairments associated with using a cell phone while driving can be as profound as those associated with driving while drunk. Application: This research may help to provide guidance for regulation addressing driver distraction caused by cell phone conversations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 707–715.
2.
Billings, C. E., Demosthenes, T., White, T. R., & O'Hara, D. B. (1991). Effects of alcohol on pilot performance in simulated flight. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 62, 233–235.
3.
Briem, V., & Hedman, L. R. (1995). Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics, 38, 2536–2562.
4.
Brookhuis, K. A. (2003 July). On the Assessment of Criteria for Driver Impairment: In search of the Golden Yardstick for Driving Performance. Presented at Driving Assessment 2003: International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Park City, UT.
5.
Brookhuis, K. A., De Vries, G., & De Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309–316.
6.
Brown, I. D., Tickner, A. H., & Simmonds, D. C. V. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 419–424.
7.
Brown, T. L., Lee, J. D., & McGehee, D. V. (2001). Human performance models and rear-end collision avoidance algorithms. Human Factors, 43, 462–482.
8.
Burns, M. & Moskovitz, H. (1980). Effects of diphenhydramine and alcohol on skills performance. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 17, 259–266.
9.
Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association. (2006). Background on CTIA's semi-annual wireless industry survey. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://files.ctia.org/pdf/CTIAEndYear2005Survey.pdf
10.
Glassbrenner, D. (2005). Driver cell phone use in 2004—Overall results. In Traffic safety facts: Research note (DOT HS 809 847). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
11.
Goodman, M. F., Bents, F. D., Tijerina, L., Wierwille, W., Lerner, N., & Benel, D. (1999). An investigation of the safety implications of wireless communication in vehicles: Report summary (Department of Transportation electronic publication). Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/research/wireless/#rep
12.
Hirst, S., & Graham, R. (1997). The format and presentation of collision warnings. In Y. I. Noy (Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces (pp. 203–319). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Klein, K. (1972). Prediction of flight safety hazards from drug induced performance decrements with alcohol as a reference substance. Aerospace Medicine, 43, 1207–1214.
15.
Lee, J. D., Vaven, B., Haake, S., & Brown, T. L. (2001). Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effects of speech-based E-mail on drivers' attention to the roadway. Human Factors, 43, 631–640.
16.
Mazzae, E. N., Ranney, T. A., Watson, G. S., & Wightman, J. A. (2004). Hand-held or hands-free' The effects of wireless phone interface type on phone task performance and driver performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 2218–2221). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17.
McKnight, A. J., & McKnight, A. S. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 25, 259–265.
18.
Moskovitz, H., & Fiorentino, D. (2000). A review of the literature on effects of low doses of alcohol on driving-related skills (U.S. DOT/NHTSA Report). Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/research/pub/Hs809028/Title.htm#Contents
19.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2001). Alcohol and highway safety 2001: A review of the state of knowledge (NHTSA DOT HS 809 383). Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www. nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/research/AlcoholHighway/index.htm #Contents
20.
Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.
21.
Patten, C. J. D., Kircher, A., Ostlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 341–350.
22.
Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453–458.
23.
Reschovsky, C. (2004). Journey to work: 2000, Census 2000 brief. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/c2kbr-33.pdf
24.
Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
25.
Strayer, D. L. & Drews, F. A. (2004). Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors, 46, 640–649.
26.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23–52.
27.
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.
28.
Stutts, J., Feaganes, J., Rodgman, E., Hamlett, C., Meadows, T., Reinfurt, D.Gish, K., Mercadante, M., & Staplin, L. (2003). Distractions in everyday driving. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
29.
Thapar, P. J., Zacny, J. P., Choi, M., & Apfelbaum, J. L. (1995). Using alcohol as a standard to assess the degree of impairment induced by sedative and analgesic drugs used in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology and Analgesia, 80, 1092–1098.
30.
Tiplady, B. (1991). Alcohol as a comparator. In I. D. Keepler, L. D. Sanders, & M. Rosen (Eds.), Ambulatory anesthesia and sedation (pp. 26–37). Malden, MA: Blackwell Scientific.
31.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2002). Traffic safety facts 2002: Alcohol (DOT HS 809 606). Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2002/2002alcfacts.pdf
32.
Willette, R. E., & Walsh, J. M. (1983). Drugs, driving, and traffic safety. Geneva: World Health Organization.
33.
Williamson, A., Feyer, A. M., Friswel, R., & Finlay-Brown, S. (2001). Developing measures of fatigue using an alcohol comparison to validate the effects of fatigue on performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, 313–326.
34.
Zandor, P. L., Krawchuk, S. A., & Voas, R. B. (2000). Relative risk of fatal crash involvement by BAC, age, and gender (DOT HS 809 050). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
