Objective: To better understand nursing activities and working conditions. Background: Nursing practice involves astute clinical decision making and the competent delivery of nursing care procedures. To complete nursing procedures, nurses must simultaneously organize and reorganize priorities and manage changing clinical information for multiple patients. Few researchers have examined the specific nature of nurses' activities and the effect of the environment on their work. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect data on 7 nurses engaged in nursing activities. Examples of methods include link analysis, subject matter expert, task analysis, cognitive pathway, and “stacking.” Data collection focused on how nurses managed priorities, changing clinical information, and interruptions. Results: The “cognitive pathway” graphically depicts the nature of nurses' work. Specifically, it reveals the shifting of the nurse's attention from patient to patient and the occurrence of interruptions. “Stacking” shows the number of tasks a nurse must balance at any one time. On average, nurses had 10 or more activities waiting to be performed and experienced 3.4 interruptions/hr. Conclusion: These methods provide unique insight into the dynamic nature of patient care and nursing work. Application: Extension of the methods demonstrated here may be useful in guiding efforts to change the work of nursing to better provide quality care and less stressful work environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boyle, C. A. (1996). Using a time-flow study to identify ambulatory surgical delays. Journal of Post Anesthesia Nursing, 11, 71–77.
2.
Ebright, P. R., Patterson, E. S., Chalko, B. A., & Render, M. L. (2003). Understanding the complexity of registered nurse work in acute care settings. Journal of Nursing Administration, 33, 630–638.
3.
Flynn, E. A., Barker, K. N., Gibson, J. T., Pearson, R. E., Berger, B. A., & Smith, L. A. (1999). Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 56, 1319–1325.
4.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
Kirwan, B., & Ainsworth, L. K. (2001). A guide to task analysis. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
6.
Leatt, P., Baker, G. P., Halverson, P. K., & Aird, C. (1997). Downsizing, reengineering, and restructuring: Long-term implications for healthcare organizations. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 13(4), 3–37.
7.
Pepitone, J. S. (2002). A case for humaneering. IIE Solutions, 34, 39–44.
8.
Potter, P., Boxerman, S., Wolf, L., Marshall, J., Grayson, D., Sledge, J., et al. (2004). Mapping the nursing process. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34, 101–109.
9.
Potter, P., & Perry, A. (2005). Fundamentals of nursing (6th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier.
10.
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering.New York: Wiley.
11.
Reynolds, R., & Brannick, M. (2002, April). Thinking about work/thinking at work: Cognitive task analysis. In R. P. Tett & J. C. Hogan (Co-Chairs), Recent developments in cognitive and personality approaches to job analysis. Symposium presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.
12.
Rhoades, D. R., McFarland, K. F., Finch, W. H., & Johnson, A. O. (2001). Speaking and interruptions during primary care office visits. Family Medicine, 33, 528–532.
13.
Schweikhart, S. B., & Smith-Daniels, V. (1996). Re-engineering the work of caregivers: Role redefinition, team structures, and organizational redesign. Hospital and Health Service Administration, 41(1), 19–36.
14.
Vicente, K. J. (1995). Task analysis, cognitive task analysis, cognitive work analysis: What's the difference? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (pp. 534–537). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
15.
Welch, D. L. (1998). Human factors in the health care facility. Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology, 32, 311–316.
16.
Wong, D. H., Gallegos, Y., & Weinger, M. B. (2003). Changes in intensive care unit nurse task activity after installation of a third-generation intensive care unit information system. Critical Care Medicine, 31, 2488–2494.
