The Efficacy of a Medical Virtual Reality Simulator for Training Phlebotomy

Abstract

Objective: The present study compared the effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR) simulator for training phlebotomy with that of a more traditional approach using simulated limbs. Background: Phlebotomy, or drawing blood, is one of the most common medical procedures; yet, there are no universal standards for training and assessing performance. The absence of any standards can lead to injuries and inaccurate test results if the procedure is improperly performed. Method: Twenty 3rd-year medical students were trained under one of the two methods and had their performance assessed with a 28-item checklist. Results: The results showed that performance improvements were limited to those who trained with the simulated limbs, and a detailed comparison of the two systems revealed several functional and physical differences that may explain these findings. Conclusion: Participants trained with simulated limbs performed better than those trained with a VR simulator; however, the metrics recorded by the VR system may address some aspects of performance that could eventually prove beneficial. Application: The present study highlights the potential for medical simulators to improve patient safety by enabling trainees to practice procedures on devices instead of patients. Applications of this research include training, performance assessment, and design of simulator systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Medical Association. (2003). AMA delegates approve limits on resident working hours. Retrieved August 12, 2003, from http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/11106.html

Basdogan, C. , & Srinivasan, M. A. (2002). Haptic rendering in virtual environments. In K. M. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation and applications (pp. 117–134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chang, K. K. , Chung, J. W. , & Wong, T. K. (2002). Learning intravenous cannulation: A comparison of the conventional method and the CathSim intravenous training system. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11, 73–78.

Clover, S. (2002, July). Phlebotomy safety: Sticking to good practices. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from the Advance Newsmagazines for Medical Laboratory Professionals Web site: http://www.advanceformlp.com/common/editorial/PrintFriendly.aspx?CC=6475

Dawson, S. L. (2002). A critical approach to medical simulation. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 87(11), 12–18.

Engum, S. A. , Jeffries, P. , & Fisher, L. (2003). Intravenous catheter training system: Computer-based education versus traditional learning methods. American Journal of Surgery, 186, 67–74.

Gopher, D. , Weil, M. , Bareket, T. , & Caspi, S. (1988). Fidelity of task structure as a guiding principle in the development of skill trainers based upon complex computer games. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1266–1270). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Hays, R. T. , & Singer, M. J. (1989). Simulator fidelity in training system design. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Health Grades, Inc. (2004). Patient safety in American hospitals. Lakewood, CO: Author.

10.

Helmreich, R. L. , & Schaefer, H. (1994). Team performance in the operating room. In M. S. Bogner (Ed.), Human error in medicine (pp. 225–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

11.

Holding, D. H. (1965). Principles of training. London: Pergamon Press.

12.

Howanitz, P. J. , Cembrowski, G. S. , & Bachner, P. (1991). Laboratory phlebotomy: College of American Pathologists Q-probe study of patient satisfaction and complications in 23 783 patients. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 115, 867–872.

13.

Kohn, L. T. , Corrigan, J. M. , & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

14.

Krahl, K. , & Scerbo, M. W. (1997). Performance on an adaptive automated team tracking task with human and computer teammates. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 551–555). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

15.

Mishori, R. (2004, June 1). Drawing without a license: Phlebotomists get little training, regulation. Washington Post, p. HE1.

16.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (1999). How to protect yourself from needlestick injuries. Retrieved June 9, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/2000-135.html

17.

Proctor, R. W. , & Dutta, A. (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

18.

Prystowsky, J. B. , Regehr, G. , Rogers, D. A. , Loan, J. P. , Hiemenz, L. L. , & Smith, K. M. (1999). A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement. American Journal of Surgery, 177, 171–175.

19.

Reznek, M. A. , Rawn, C. L. , & Krummel, T. M. (2002). Evaluation of the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality intravenous insertion simulator. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 1319–1325.

20.

Satava, R. M. (1993). Virtual reality surgical simulator: The first steps. Surgical Endoscopy, 7, 203–205.

21.

Satava, R. M. (2001). Accomplishments and challenges of surgical simulation: Dawning of the next-generation surgical education. Surgical Endoscopy, 15, 232–241.

22.

Satava, R. M. , & Jones, S. B. (2002). Medical applications of virtual environments. In K. M. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation and applications (pp. 937–957). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

23.

Scerbo, M. W. (in press). Medical virtual reality simulators. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

24.

Scerbo, M. W. , Bliss, J. P. , Schmidt, E. A. , Thompson, S. N. , Cox, T. D. , & Poland, H. J. (2004). A comparison of the CathSim system and simulated limbs for teaching intravenous cannulation. In J. D. Westwood , R. S. Haluck , H. M. Hoffman , G. T. Mogel , R. Phillips , & R. A. Robb (Eds.), Medicine meets virtual reality 12 (pp. 196–198). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

25.

Schneider, W. (1985). Training high-performance skills: Fallacies and guidelines. Human Factors, 27, 285–300.

26.

Seymour, N. E. , Gallagher, A. G. , Roman, A. A. , O'Brien, M. K. , Bansal, V. K. , Andersen, D. K. , et al. (2002). Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery, 236, 458–464.

27.

Ursino, M. , Tasto, J. L. , Nguyen, B. H. , Cunningham, R. , & Merril, G. L. (1999). CathSim: An intravenous catheterization simulator on a PC. In J. D. Westwood , H. M. Hoffman , R. A. Robb , & D. Stredney (Eds.), Medicine meets virtual reality VII (pp. 360–366). Amsterdam: IOS Press.