Objective: The performance costs associated with cell phone use while driving were assessed meta-analytically using standardized measures of effect size along five dimensions. Background: There have been many studies on the impact of cell phone use on driving, showing some mixed findings. Methods: Twenty-three studies (contributing 47 analysis entries) met the appropriate conditions for the meta-analysis. The statistical results from each of these studies were converted into effect sizes and combined in the meta-analysis. Results: Overall, there were clear costs to driving performance when drivers were engaged in cell phone conversations. However, subsequent analyses indicated that these costs were borne primarily by reaction time tasks, with far smaller costs associated with tracking (lane-keeping) performance. Hands-free and handheld phones revealed similar patterns of results for both measures of performance. Conversation tasks tended to show greater costs than did information-processing tasks (e.g., word games). There was a similar pattern of results for passenger and remote (cell phone) conversations. Finally, there were some small differences between simulator and field studies, though both exhibited costs in performance for cell phone use. Conclusion: We suggest that (a) there are significant costs to driver reactions to external hazards or events associated with cell phone use, (b) hands-free cell phones do not eliminate or substantially reduce these costs, and (c) different research methodologies or performance measures may underestimate these costs. Application: Potential applications of this research include the assessment of performance costs attributable to different types of cell phones, cell phone conversations, experimental measures, or methodologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1994). Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones---A simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 441–451.
2.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 707–715.
3.
Brookhuis, K. A., de Vries, G., & de Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309–316.
4.
Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association. (2004). CTIA's world of wireless communications. Retrieved August 10, 2004, from http://www.wow-com.com/. [Data indicating most recent numbers of cellular subscribers in the U.S.]
5.
Consiglio, W., Driscoll, P., Witte, M., & Berg, W. P. (2003). Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 495–500.
6.
Cooper, P. J., Zheng, Y., Richard, C., Vavrik, J., Heinrichs, B., & Sigmund, G. (2003). The impact of hands-free message reception/response on driving task performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 23–35.
7.
Goodman, M., Bents, F. D., Tijerina, L., Wierwille, W., Lerner, N., & Benel, D. (1997). An investigation of the safety implications of wireless communications in vehicles (Rep. No. DOT HS 808--635). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
8.
Green, P., Hoekstra, E., & Williams, M. (1993). Further on-the-road tests of driver interfaces: Examination of a route guidance system and a car phone (Rep. No. UMTRI-93-35). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
9.
Gugerty, L., Rando, C., Rakauskas, M., Brooks, J., & Olson, H. (2003). Differences in remote versus in-person communications while performing a driving task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 1855–1859). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
10.
Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Interpreting and evaluating meta-analysis. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 18, 393–407.
11.
Hanowski, R., Kantowitz, B., & Tijerina, L. (1995). Heavy vehicle driver workload assessment Task 7b: In-cab text message system and cellular phone use by heavy vehicle drivers in a part-task driving simulator (Rep. No. DOT HS 808 467). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
12.
Horrey, W. J., & Wickens, C. D. (2004a). Driving and side task performance: The effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Human Factors, 46, 611–624.
13.
Horrey, W. J., & Wickens, C. D. (2004b). The impact of cell phone conversations on driving: A meta-analytic approach (Tech. Rep. AHFD-04-2/GM-04-1). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Human Factors Division.
14.
Horswill, M. S., & McKenna, F. P. (1999). The effect of interference on dynamic risk-taking judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 189–199.
15.
Irwin, M., Fitzgerald, C., & Berg, W. P. (2000). Effect of the intensity of wireless telephone conversations on reaction time in a braking response. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1130–1134.
16.
Kantowitz, B. H., Hanowski, R. J., & Tijerina, L. (1996). Simulator evaluation of heavy-vehicle driver workload: II. Complex tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 877–881). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17.
Laberge, J., Scialfa, C., White, C., & Caird, J. (2004). The effect of passenger and cellular phone conversations on driver distraction. In Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (n.p.). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
18.
Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., & Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 617–623.
19.
McKnight, A. J., & McKnight, A. S. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 25, 259–265.
20.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2000). Internet forum on the safety implications of driver distraction when using in-vehicle technologies. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/welcome.htm
21.
Nilsson, L., & Alm, H. (1991). Elderly people and mobile telephone use: Effects on driver behavior. In Proceedings of the Strategic Highway Research Program and Traffic Safety on Two Continents (pp. 117–133). Gothenburg, Sweden: Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute (VTI).
22.
Parkes, A. M., & Hooijmeijer, V. (2001). Driver situation awareness and carphone use. In Proceedings of the 1st Human-Centered Transportation Simulation Conference (n.p.). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
23.
Patten, C. J. D., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 341–350.
24.
Rakauskas, M., Gugerty, L., & Ward, N. J. (2004). Effects of cell phone conversations on driving performance with naturalistic conversations. Journal of Safety Research, 35, 435–464.
25.
Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453–458.
26.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Rosenthal, R., & Dimatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59–82.
28.
Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Scargle, J. D. (2000). Publication bias: The “file-drawer” problem in scientific inference. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 14, 91–106.
30.
Spence, C., & Read, L. (2003). Speech shadowing while driving: On the difficulty of splitting attention between eye and ear. Psychological Science, 14, 251–256.
31.
Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A. (2003). Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 1860–1864). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
32.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23–32.
33.
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.
34.
Tijerina, L., Kiger, S., Rockwell, T., & Tornow, C. (1996). Heavy vehicle driver workload assessment Task 7a: In-cab text message system and cellular phone use by heavy vehicle drivers in a part-task driving simulator (Rep. No. DOT HS 808 467). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
35.
Waugh, J. D., Glumm, M. M., Kilduff, P. W., Tauson, R. A., Smyth, C. C., & Pillalamarri, R. S. (2000). Cognitive workload while driving and talking on a cellular phone or to a passenger. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 6.276–6.279). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
36.
Wickens, C. D. (2001). Attention to safety and the psychology of surprise. Proceedings of the 2001 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (n.p.). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
37.
Young, R. A. (2001). Association between embedded cellular phone calls and vehicle crashes involving airbag deployment. In Proceedings of the 1st International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Aspen, CO, (pp. 390–400).
