Two experiments conducted in a high-fidelity flight simulator examined the effects of guidance symbology, display size, and geometric field of view (GFOV) within a synthetic vision system (SVS). In Experiment 1, 18 pilots flew highlighted and lowlighted tunnel-in-the-sky displays, as well as a less cluttered follow-me aircraft (FMA), through a series of curved approaches over rugged terrain. The results revealed that both tunnels supported better flight path tracking and lower workload levels than did the FMA because of the availability of more preview information. Increasing tunnel intensity had no benefit on tracking and, in fact, degraded traffic awareness because of clutter and attentional tunneling. In Experiment 2, 24 pilots flew a lowlighted tunnel configured according to different display sizes (small or large) and GFOVs (30° or 60°). Measures of flight path tracking and terrain awareness generally favored the 60° GFOV; however, there were no effects of display size. Actual or potential applications of this research include understanding the impact of SVS properties on flight path tracking, traffic and terrain awareness, workload, and the allocation of attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beringer, D. B. (1999). Flight command-guidance indicators or pathway displays: My way or the highway' In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 57--62). Columbus: Ohio State University.
2.
Beringer, D. B. (2000). Development of highway-in-the-sky displays for flightpath guidance: History, performance, results, guidelines. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 3.21--3.24). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3.
Beringer, D. B., & Ball, J. (2001). General aviation pilot visual performance using conformal and non-conformal head-up and head-down highway-in-the-sky displays. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology [CD-ROM] (n.p.). Columbus: Ohio State University.
4.
Boeckman, K. J., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). The resolution and performance effects of three-dimensional display rotation on local guidance and spatial awareness measures (Tech. Rep. ARL-01-4/NASA-01-3). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
5.
Comstock, J. RGlaab, L. JPrinzel, L. J & Elliott, D. M. (2001). Can effective synthetic vision system displays be implemented on limited size display spaces? In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology [CD-ROM] (n.p.). Columbus: Ohio State University.
6.
Doherty, S. M., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). An analysis of the immersed perspective flight path display benefit: Benefits of preview, prediction, and frame of reference (Tech. Rep. ARL-00-5/ NASA-00-1). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.
7.
Fadden, S.Ververs, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). Pathway HUDS: Are they viable?. Human Factors, 43173–193.
8.
Fisher, D. LCoury, B. GTengs, T. O & Duffy, S.A. (1989). Minimizing the time to search visual displays: The role of highlighting. Human Factors, 31167–182.
9.
Haskell, I. D., & Wickens, C. D. (1993). Two- and three- dimensional displays for aviation: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 387–109.
10.
Jensen, R. S. (1981). Prediction and quickening in perspective flight displays for curved landing approaches. Human Factors, 23355–363.
11.
Johnson, W. WLiao, M.-J., & Granada, S. (2002). Effects of symbol brightness cueing on attention during a visual search of a cockpit display of traffic information. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (pp. 1599--1603). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12.
Kroft, P., & Wickens, C. D. (2003). Displaying multi-domain graphical database information: An evaluation of scanning, clutter, display size, and user interactivity. Information Display Journal, 1144–52.
13.
Mulder, M. (2003). An information-centered analysis of the tunnel-in-the-sky display: Part 1. Straight tunnel trajectories. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1349–72.
14.
Onstott, E. E. (1976). Task interference in multi axis stabilization. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Manual Control (NASA TMX-73; n.p.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
Prinzel, L. JComstock, J. RGlaab, L. JKramer, L. JArthur, J. J & Barry, J.S. (2004). The efficacy of head-down and head-up synthetic vision display concepts for retro- and forward-fit of commercial aircraft. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1453–77.
16.
Remington, R. WJohnston, J. CRuthruff, E.Gold, M. & Romera, M. (2000). Visual search in complex displays: Factors for affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers. Human Factors, 42349–366.
17.
Schnell, T.Kwon, Y.Merchant, S.Etherington, T. (2004). Improved flight technical performance in flight decks equipped with synthetic vision information system displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1479–102.
18.
Scott, W. B. (2001, October 29). Synthetic vision systems: Ready for prime time' Aviation Week and Space Technology, 155 (18), 78–80.
19.
Stark, J. MComstock, J. RPrinzel, L. JBurdette, D. W & Scerbo, M.W. (2001). A preliminary examination of situation awareness and pilot performance in a synthetic vision environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 40--43). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
20.
Stelzer, E. M., & Wickens, C. D. (in press). Pilots strategically compensate for display enlargements in surveillance and flight control tasks. Human Factors.
21.
Ve rvers, P. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1998). Head-up displays: Effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8377–403.
22.
Vidulich, M. A., & Wickens, C. D. (1986). Causes of dissociation between subjective workload measures and performance. Applied Ergonomics, 17291–296.
23.
Wang, W., & Milgram, P. (2003). Effects of viewpoint displacement on navigational performance in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 139--143). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
24.
Weintraub, D. J., & Ensing, M. J. (1992). The book of HUD: A head-up display state of the art report (CSERIAC state of the art report). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Lab.
25.
Wickens, C. D. (1998). Commonsense statistics. Ergonomics in Design, 6 (4), 18–22.
26.
Wickens, C. DAlexander, A. L & Hardy, T.J. (2003). The primary flight display and its pathway guidance: Workload, performance, and situation awareness (Tech. Rep. AHFD-03-2/ NASA-03-1). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Human Factors Division.
27.
Wickens, C. DAlexander, A. LMartens, M. H & Ambinder, M. (2004). The influences of highlighting on visual search. Spatial Vision, 17373–388.
28.
Wickens, C. DAlexander, A. LThomas, L. CHorrey, W. JNunes, A.Hardy, T. J., et al. (2004). Traffic and flight guidance depiction on a synthetic vision system display: The effects of clutter on performance and visual attention allocation (Tech. Rep. AHFD-04-10/NASA(HPM)-04-1). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Human Factors Division.
29.
Wickens, C. D., & Long, J. (1995). Object versus space-based models of visual attention: Implications for the design of head-up displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1179–193.
30.
Wickens, C. D., & Prevett, T. T. (1995). Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1110–135.
31.
Wickens, C. Dvan Offlen, P. J., Muthard, E. K., Alexander, A. L., & Podczerwinski, E. S. (2003). The influences of display highlighting and size and event eccentricity for aviation surveillance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 149--153). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
32.
Williams, K. (2002). Impact of aviation highway-in-the-sky displays on pilot situation awareness. Human Factors, 4418–27.
33.
Woods, D. D. (1984). Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21229–244.
34.
Yeh, M., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). Attentional filtering in the design of electronic map displays: A comparison of color-coding, intensity coding, and decluttering techniques. Human Factors, 43543–562.
