Using Eye Movements To Evaluate Effects of Driver Age on Risk Perception in a Driving Simulator

Abstract

Novice drivers (16-year-olds with ≤6 months' driving experience) have the highest crash involvement rates per 100 million vehicle miles (161 million vehicle km). In the past, this was attributed to greater risk taking or poorly developed psychomotor skills. More recently, however, their high crash involvement rate has been hypothesized to be attributable largely to their relative inability to acquire and assess information in inherently risky situations. The current study seeks to evaluate this hypothesis by recording eye movements while 72 participants (24 novice drivers, 24 younger drivers, and 24 older drivers) drove through 16 risky scenarios in an advanced driving simulator. There were significant age-related differences in driver scanning behavior, consistent with the hypothesis that novice drivers' scanning patterns reflect their failure to acquire information about potential risks and their consequent failure to deal with these risks. Actual or potential applications of this research include modification of these scenarios for display on a PC as a basis for a training module that would enable novice drivers to recognize risky scenarios before they encounter them on the road, in the hope of reducing their high fatality rate.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aizenberg, R. , & McKenzie, D. M. (1997). Teen and senior drivers (CAL-DMV-RSS-97-168). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Cerrelli, E. C. (1998). Crash data and rates for age-sex groups of drivers, 1996. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Crundall, D. , & Underwood, G. (1998). Effects of experience and processing demand on visual information acquisition in drivers. Ergonomics, 41 448–458.

Fisher, D. L Laurie, N. E Glaser, R. Connerney, K. Pollatsek, A. & Duffy, S.A. (2002). The use of an advanced driving simulator to evaluate the effects of training and experience on drivers' behavior in risky traffic scenarios. Human Factors, 44 287–302.

Fisher, D. L Narayanaan, V. Pollatsek, A. & Pradhan, A. (2004). Using eye movements to in driving simulators to evaluate effects of PC-based risk awareness training. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 2266-2270). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Glaser, R. , & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Driving simulators: Are they valid test environments for ITS development? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 926-928). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Gregersen, N. P. (1996). Young car drivers: Why are they overrepre-sented in car accidents? How can driver training improve their situation? (VTI Rapport 409A). Linkoping: Swedish National Road and Transport Institute.

Human Performance Laboratory. (2005, July). Link foundation for simulation and training. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http:// www.ecs.umass.edu/hpl/LinkVideos.htm

Kaptein, N. A Theeuwes, J. & van der Horst, R. (1996). Driving simulator validity: Some considerations. Transportation Research Record, 1550 30–36.

10.

Lonero, L. P Clinton, K. M Brock, J. Wilde, G. Laurie, I. & Black, D. (1995). Novice driver model education curriculum outline. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.

11.

Lonero, L. P Clinton, K. M & Douglas, M.B. (1998). Driver education curriculum outline. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1396-1400). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

12.

Mayhew, D. R. , & Simpson, H. M. (1995). The role of driving experience: Implications for training and licensing of new drivers. To ronto: Insurance Bureau of Canada.

13.

McKnight, J. A. , & McKnight, S. A. (2003). Young novice drivers: Careless or clueless. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35 921–925.

14.

Mourant, R. R. , & Rockwell, T. H. (1972). Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers. Human Factors, 14 325–335.

15.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2000). Traffic safety facts 2000: Young drivers (DOT HS 809 336). Retrieved August 6, 2005, from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/ nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2000/2000ydrive.pdf

16.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2002). Traffic safety facts 2002: Young drivers (DOT HS 809 619). Retrieved August 6, 2005, from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/ nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2002/2002ydrfacts.pdf

17.

Ranney, T. A. (1994). Models of driving behavior: A review of their evaluation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26 733–750.

18.

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 124 372–422.

19.

Treat, J. R Tumbas, N. S McDonald, S. T Shinar, D. Hume, R. D. , Mayer, R. E., et al. (1979). Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents: Final report Vol. I. Causal factor tabulation and assessments (DOT-805 085). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Institute for Research in Public Safety.

20.

Willis, D. K. (1998). The impetus for the development of a new risk management training program for teen drivers. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1394-1395). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.