Effects of Voice Technology on Test Track Driving Performance: Implications for Driver Distraction

Abstract

This work compares the degradation in driving performance associated with secondary tasks performed with voice-based and visual/manual interfaces, including radio tuning, phone dialing, and more complex tasks involving a sequence of interactions with an in-vehicle computer system. Twenty-one participants drove an instrumented vehicle while performing a combination of car-following, peripheral target detection, and secondary tasks on a closed test track. Drivers compensated for increased task demands associated with secondary tasks by increasing their following distance. Performing secondary tasks also resulted in significant decrements to vehicle control, target detection, and car-following performance. The voice-based interface helped reduce the distracting effects of secondary task performance. Modest improvements were observed for measures of vehicle control and target detection but not for car following. The results indicated that performing in-vehicle tasks required diversion of both peripheral (visual and manual) and attentional (cognitive) resources from driving. The voice-based interface reduced the peripheral impairment but did not appreciably reduce the attentional impairment. Actual or potential applications of this research include improvements to the design of invehicle information systems and the development of evaluation protocols to assess their distraction potential.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barickman, F. S. , & Goodman, M. J. (1999). Micro DAS: In-vehicle portable data acquisition system. Transportation Research Record, 1689, 1–8.

Bendat, J. S. , & Piersol, A. G. (1986). Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures. New York: Wiley.

Brookhuis, K. , de Vries, G. , & de Waard, D. (1991). The effect of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309–316.

Brookhuis, K. , de Waard, D. , & Mulder, B. (1994). Measuring driving performance by car-following in traffic. Ergonomics, 37, 427–434.

Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association. (2005). CTIA's semi-annual wireless industry survey results. Retrieved March 24, 2005, from http://files.ctia.org/pdf/CTIAYearend2004Survey.pdf

Goodman, M. J. , Tijerina, L. , Bents, F. D. , & Wierwille, W. W. (1999). Using cellular telephones in vehicles: Safe or unsafe? Transportation Human Factors, 1, 3–42.

Harms, L. , & Patten, C. (2003). Peripheral detection as a measure of driver distraction: A study of memory-based versus systembased navigation in a built-up area. Transportation Research, 6F, 23–36.

Hart, S. G. , & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock , & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Jacko, J. A. , & Salvendy, G. (1996). Hierarchical menu design: Breadth, depth, and task complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1187–1201.

10.

Laberge-Nadeau, C. , Maag, U. , Bellavance, F. , Desjardins, D. , Messier, S. , & Saida, A. (2001). Wireless telephones and the risk of road accidents (Report No. CRT-2001-16). Montreal, Canada: University of Montreal Center for Research on Transportation.

11.

Lee, J. D. , McGehee, D. V. , & Brown, T. L. (2000). Prior exposure, warning algorithm parameters and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions on a high-fidelity simulator. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 3.316–3.320). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

12.

MacDonald, W. A. , & Hoffman, E. R. (1980). Review of relationships between steering wheel reversal rate and driving task demand. Human Factors, 22, 733–739.

13.

Michon, J. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know, what should we do? In L. E. Evans , & R. Schwing (Eds.), Human behavior and traffic safety (pp. 485–520). New York: Plenum Press.

14.

Moroney, W. F. , Biers, D. W. , Eggemeier, F. T. , & Mitchell, J. A. (1992). A comparison of two scoring procedures with the NASA task load index in a simulated flight task. In Proceedings of the 1992 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (pp. 734–740). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

15.

Muto, W. H. , & Wierwille, W. W. (1982). The effect of repeated emergency response trials on performance during extended duration simulated driving. Human Factors, 24, 693–698.

16.

Redelmeier, D. A. , & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453–458.

17.

Rumar, K. (1990). The basic driver error: Late detection. Ergonomics, 33, 1281–1290.

18.

Smiley, A. (2000). Behavior adaptation, safety, and intelligent transportation systems. Transportation Research Record, 1724, 47–51.

19.

Strayer, D. L. , & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.

20.

Stutts, J. C. , Reinfurt, D. W. , Staplin, L. , & Rodgman, E. A. (2001). The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.

21.

Tijerina, L. (2000, January). Issues in the evaluation of driver distraction associated with in-vehicle information and telecommunications systems (Paper No. 00-1477). Presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.

22.

Tijerina, L. , Kiger, S. , Rockwell, T. , & Tornow, C. (1995). Workload assessment of in-cab text message system and cellular phone use by heavy vehicle drivers on the road (Report No. DOT HS 808 467 [7A]). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

23.

Utter, D. (2001). Passenger vehicle driver cell phone use: Results from the Fall 2000 occupant protection use survey (Research Note DOT HS 809 293). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

24.

Westfall, P. H. , Tobias, R. D. , Rom, D. , Wolfinger, R. D. , & Hochberg, Y. (2003). Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

25.

Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman , & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–101). New York: Academic Press.

26.

Wickens, C. D. (1999). [Letter to the editor]. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 205–206.

27.

Wickens, C. D. , & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.