The present study examined the perceptions of cellular phone users and nonusers on issues relating to vehicle control and driver distraction. Participants were asked if they own a cellular phone; if so, how much they use it; and their beliefs regarding cellular phone use while driving, including actions involving the use of cellular phones which could potentially cause vehicular accidents and the need for laws. A total of 330 individuals participated; 72% owned a cellular phone. The results indicate that nonusers of cellular phones believed more strongly than users that cellular phone use while driving negatively affects driving performance and that talking on the cellular phone could potentially cause an accident, and they also had a greater preference for new laws limiting such acts. Cellular phone users, more than nonusers, preferred no laws limiting cellular phone use and believed more strongly that other people driving while using a cellular phone were more dangerous than themselves doing the same. Implications of these results are discussed. Actual or potential applications of this research include interventions that limit driver distractibility.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, A., Bochner, S., & Bilik, L. (1998). The effectiveness of warning signs in hazardous work places: Cognitive and social determinants. Applied Ergonomics, 29, 247–254.
2.
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1994). Changes in driver behavior as a function of handsfree mobile phones --- A simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 441–451.
3.
Briem, V., & Hedman, L. R. (1995). Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics, 38, 2536–2562.
4.
Brookhuis, K. A., de Vries, G., & de Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309–316.
5.
Cain, A., & Burris, M. (1999, April). Investigation of the use of mobile phones while driving.Tampa, FL: Center for Urban Transportation Research.
6.
Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association. (2004). Annualized wireless industry results. Retrieved May 9, 2005, from http://files.ctia.org/pdf/CTIAYearend2004Survey.pdf
7.
Dalziel, J. R., & Job, R. F. S. (1997). Motor vehicle accidents, fatigue and optimism bias in taxi drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29, 489–494.
8.
Dejoy, D. M. (1987). The optimism bias and traffic safety. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 756–759). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9.
DeJoy, D. M. (1999). Attitudes and beliefs. In M. S. Wogalter, D. M. DeJoy, & K. R. Laughery (Eds.), Warnings and risk communication (pp. 189–219). London: Taylor & Francis.
10.
Goodman, M. J., Tijerina, L., Bents, F. D., & Wierwille, W. W. (1999). Using cellular telephones in vehicles: Safe or unsafe?Transportation Human Factors, 1, 3–42.
11.
Haigney, D. E., Taylor, R. G., & Westerman, S. J. (2000). Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: Task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transportation Research, Part F, 3, 113–121.
12.
Horberry, T., Bubnich, C., Hartley, L., & Lamble, D. (2001). Driver's use of hand-held mobile phones in Western Australia. Transportation Research, Part F, 4, 213–218.
13.
Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., & Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 617–623.
14.
Laughery, K. R., Wogalter, M. S., & Young, S. L. (Eds.). (1994). Human factors perspectives on warnings: Selections from Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meetings 1980--1993.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
15.
Mayhorn, C. B., Nichols, T. A., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2004). Hazards in the home: Using older adults' perceptions to inform warning design. Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 11(4), 211–218.
16.
McKnight, A. J., & McKnight, A. S. (1993). The effects of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 25, 259–265.
17.
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2002, March). Along for the ride: Reducing driver distractions.Denver, CO: Author.
18.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2001, July). Research note: Passenger vehicle driver cell phone use results from the Fall 2000 national occupant protection use survey (DOT HS 809 293). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
19.
Perloff, R. (1993). Third person effect research 1983--1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167–184.
20.
Racicot, B. M., & Wogalter, M. S. (1995). Effects of a video warning sign and social modeling on behavioral compliance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 57–64.
21.
Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453–458.
22.
Reed, M. P., & Green, P. A. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephoning dialing task. Ergonomics, 42, 1015–1037.
23.
Reinfurt, D. W., Huang, H. F., Feaganes, J. R., & Hunter, W. W. (2001). Cellular phone use while driving in North Carolina (Report prepared for the North Carolina Governor's Highway Safety Program). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.
24.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., Albert, R. W., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Cellular phone induced perceptual impairments during simulated driving. In D. V. McGehee, J. D. Lee, & M. Rizzo (Eds.), Driving Assessment 2001: International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 14–19). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
25.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2002). Why do cellular phone conversations interfere with driving? In Proceedings of the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (pp. 1-10). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
26.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phoneinduced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(1), 23–32.
27.
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.
28.
Use of Mobile Telephones, 7 NY Vehicle and Traffic Law, 33-1225(c), (2001).
29.
Violanti, J. M. (1998). Cellular phones and fatal traffic collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 519–524.
30.
Violanti, J. M., & Marshall, J. R. (1996). Cellular phones and traffic accidents: An epidemiological approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28, 265–270.
31.
Wogalter, M. S., Young, S. L., & Laughery, K. R. (Eds.). (2001). Human factors perspectives on warnings: Vol. 2. Selections from Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meetings 1993--2000.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
