Bennett, K. B., & Flach, J. M. (1992). Graphical displays: Implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors, 34, 513–533.
2.
Bennett, K. B., Nagy, A. L., & Flach, J. M. (1997). Visual displays. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed., pp. 659–696). New York: Wiley.
3.
Bennett, K. B., & Walters, B. (2001). Configural display design techniques considered at multiple levels of evaluation. Human Factors, 43, 415–434.
4.
Calcaterra, J. A., & Bennett, K. B. (2003). The placement of digital values in configural displays. Displays, 24(2), 85–96.
5.
Cleveland, W. S. (1985). The elements of graphing data.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6.
Mahan, L. K., & Arlin, M. (1992). Krause's food, nutrition and diet therapy (8th ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. S. Aunders.
7.
Marino, C. J., & Mahan, R. P. (2005; this issue). Configural displays can improve nutrition-related decisions: An application of the proximity compatibility principle. Human Factors, 47, 121–130.
8.
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering.New York: Wiley.
9.
Sanderson, P. M., Flach, J. M., Buttigieg, M. A., & Casey, E. J. (1989). Object displays do not always support better integrated task performance. Human Factors, 31, 183–198.
10.
Whitney, E. N., Cataldo, C. B., & Rolfes, R. R. (2002). Understanding normal and clinical nutrition (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
11.
Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473–494.
