LCD versus CRT Displays: A Comparison of Visual Search Performance for Colored Symbols

Abstract

Visual search performance for tactical symbols was examined with liquid-crystal (LCD) and cathode-ray tube (CRT) displays. Twenty-four adult participants (19 men, 5 women; mean age 41 years) searched for navy tactical display symbols on a map background. LCD and CRT displays of similar size and resolution (52 cm diagonal, 1280 x 1024 pixels) were used. Viewing angle (0° vs. 60° of azimuth), set size, target color (blue, red, or white), target presence, and search type (feature vs. conjunction) were also manipulated. Participants showed reduced sensitivity for red and blue symbols viewed 60° off axis with the LCD relative to on-axis LCD, or to the CRT on or off axis. Colored symbols viewed off axis on the LCD produced longer response times in feature search and lower search efficiency in conjunction search. The results argue against the use of current LCD technology when off-axis viewing is likely and color coding is used.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asian Technology Information Program. (2002). Introduction to major flat panel display technologies [On-line]. Tokyo: Author. Available: http://www.atip.or.jp/fpd/src/tutorial/fpd.html

Christ, R. E. (1975). Review and analysis of color-coding research for visual displays. Human Factors, 17, 542–570.

Hollands, J. G. , McFadden, S. , Cassidy, H. A. , & Boothby, R. (2000). Visual search performance on LCD and CRT displays: An experimental comparison. In Society for Information Display (SID) International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers (pp. 292–295). San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display.

Luder, E. (1997). Active matrix addressing of LCDs: Merits and shortcomings. In L. W. MacDonald , & A. C. Lowe (Eds.), Display systems (pp. 157–172). London: Wiley.

Mackenzie, I. S. , & Riddersma, S. (1994). Effects of output display and control-display gain on human performance in interactive systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 13, 328–337.

Macmillan, N. A. , & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Menozzi, M. , Napflin, U. , & Krueger, H. (1999). CRT versus LCD: A pilot study on visual performance and suitability of two display technologies for use in office work. Displays, 20, 3–10.

Nugent, W. A. , Keating, R. L. , & Campbell, N. L. (1995). Effects of symbol type, selection tool, and information density on tactical display visual search performance (U.S. Navy Tech. Report 1691). San Diego, CA: Naval Command, Control and Ocean Surveillance Center, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Division.

Selhuber, L. , & Parker, A. (1997). Optical characterisation of LCDs: Pitfalls and solutions. In L. W. MacDonald , & A. C. Lowe (Eds.), Display systems (pp. 289–306). London: Wiley.

10.

Sola, K. , Garner, K. , & Mikulewicz, M. (1998). The liquid crystal display (LCD) evaluation: A performance assessment by military users (NAWCADPAX - 98-79-TR). Patuxent River, MD: Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division.

11.

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command. (1991). STANAG 4420 ratification recommendations: Final report. San Diego, CA: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Code 2441.

12.

Treisman, A. M. , & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

13.

Wickens, C. D. , & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

14.

Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202–238.

15.

Wolfe, J. M. (1997). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, England: Psychology Press/Erlbaum.

16.

Wright, S. L. , Bailey, I. L. , Tuan, K.-M. , & Wacker, R. T. (1999). Resolution and legibility: A comparison of TFT-LCDs and CRTs. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 7, 253–256.