Effects of Image Scale and System Time Delay on Simulator Sickness within Head-Coupled Virtual Environments

Abstract

Novel patterns of visual-vestibular intersensory stimulation often result in symptoms of simulator sickness, raising health and safety concerns regarding virtual environment exposure. Two experiments investigated the effect of conflicting visual-vestibular cues on subjective reports of simulator sickness during and after a 30-min exposure to a head-coupled virtual interface. Virtual image scale factors (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 magnification, generated by varying geometric field of view angle) were investigated in Experiment 1, and additional system time delays (125, 250 ms) were investigated in Experiment 2. Simulator sickness metrics included spoken self-reports during exposure and simulator sickness questionnaires (pre-exposure, immediate postexposure, and 20 min postexposure). Head yaw angular position data were also recorded. Reports of simulator sickness symptoms were significantly greater in the minification (0.5) and magnification (2.0) image scale factor conditions than in the neutral condition (1.0). Simulator sickness did not vary with changes in time delay, however. Furthermore, a comparison across experiments suggests no appreciable increase in simulator sickness with increasing time delays above the nominal value (48 ms). Head angular position data exhibited certain systematic variations across conditions. Actual or potential applications of this research include virtual environment training, simulation, and entertainment systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bles, W. Bos, J. E. , de Graf, B. , Groen, E. , & Wertheim, A. H. (1998). Motion sickness: Only one provocative conflict? Brain Research Bulletin, 47, 481–487.

Boyer, B. S. , & Wickens, C. D. (1994). 3D weather displays for aircraft cockpits (Technical Report ARL-94-11/NASA-94-4). Savoy: University of Illinois Institute of Aviation, Aviation Research Laboratory.

Danas, E. (1995). Mapping auditory space onto visual space. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.

Draper, M. H. (1998). The effects of image scale factor on vestibuloocular reflex adaptation and simulator sickness in head-coupled virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1481–1486). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Durlach, N. I. , & Mavor, A. S. (Eds.). (1995). Virtual reality: Scientific and technological challenges. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ebenholtz, S. M. (1992). Motion sickness and oculomotor systems in virtual environments. Presence, 1, 302–305.

Ebenholtz, S. M. , Cohen, M. A. , & Linder, B. J. (1994). The possible role of nystagmus in motion sickness: A hypothesis. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, 1032–1035.

Foley, J. D. , van Dam, A. , Feiner, S. K. , & Hughes, J. F. (1996). Computer graphics principle and practice (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Frank, L. H. , Casali, J. G. , & Wierwille, W. (1988). Effects of visual display and motion system delays on operator performance and uneasiness in a driving simulator. Human Factors, 30, 201–217.

10.

Griffin, M. J. (1990). Handbook of human vibration. London: Academic.

11.

Hamilton, K. M. , Kantor, L. , & Magee, L. E. (1989). Limitations of postural equilibrium tests for examining simulator sickness. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 246–251.

12.

Hendrix, C. M. (1994). Exploratory studies on the sense of presence in virtual environments as a function of visual and auditory display parameters. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.

13.

Kennedy, R. S. , Hettinger, L. J. , & Lilienthal, M. G. (1990). Simulator sickness. In G. H. Crampton (Eds.), Motion and space sickness (pp. 317–342). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

14.

Kennedy, R. S. , Lane, N. E. , Berbaum, K. S. , & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993). A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 203–220.

15.

Levine, D. Whittle, M. W. , Beach, J. A. , & Ollard, P. G. (1996). Test-retest reliability of the Chattecx Balance System in the patient with hemiplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 33, 36–44.

16.

McCauley, M. E. , & Sharkey, T. J. (1992). Cybersickness: Perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence, 1, 311–318.

17.

Meyer, K. Applewhite, H. L. , & Biocca, F. A. (1992). A survey of position trackers. Presence, 1, 173–200.

18.

Pausch, R. Crea, T. , & Conway, M. (1992). A literature survey for virtual environments: Military flight simulator visual systems and simulator sickness. Presence, 1, 344–363.

19.

Peli, E. (1995, July). Real vision and virtual reality. Optics and Photonics News, 28--34.

20.

Reason, J. T. (1978). Motion sickness adaptation: A neural mismatch model. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 71, 819–829.

21.

Regan, C. (1995). An investigation into nausea and other side effects of head-coupled immersive virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 1, 17–32.

22.

Riccio, G. E. , & Stoffregen, T. A. (1991). An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological Psychology, 3, 195–240.

23.

Rushton, S. Mon-Williams, M. , & Wann, J. P. (1994). Binocular vision in a bi-ocular world: New-generation head-mounted displays avoid causing visual deficit. Displays, 15, 255–260.

24.

So, R. H. , & Griffin, M. J. (1995). Head coupled virtual environment with display lag. In K. Carr & R. England (Eds.), Simulated and virtual realities: Elements of perception (pp. 103–112). London: Taylor & Francis.

25.

Stanney, K. M. , Kennedy, R. S. , & Drexler, J. M. (1997). Cybersickness is not simulator sickness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 1138–1142). Santa Monica, CA: Humans Factors and Ergonomics Society.

26.

Stoffregen, T. A. , & Riccio, G. E. (1991). An ecological critique of the sensory conflict theory of motion sickness. Ecological Psychology, 3, 150–194.

27.

Treisman, M. (1977). Motion sickness: An evolutionary hypothesis. Science, 197, 493–495.

28.

Uliano, K. C. , Lambert, E. Y. , Kennedy, R. S. , & Sheppard, D. J. (1986). The effects of asynchronous visual delays on simulator flight performance and the development of simulator sickness symptomatology. (Technical Report NAVTRASYSCEN 85-D-0026-1, AD-A180 196). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.

29.

Viirre, E. S. (1994, July/August). A survey of medical issues and virtual reality technology. Virtual Reality World, 16--20.

30.

Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: Harper Collins.

31.

Wloka, M. M. (1995). Lag in multiprocessor virtual reality. Presence, 4, 50–63.