Minimum and Comfortable Driving Headways: Reality versus Perception

Abstract

A field study was conducted to evaluate drivers' actual headways in car-following situations, their relationship to the drivers' brake reaction times, and their relationship to the drivers' ability to estimate those headways using different metrics. Drivers were asked to maintain "minimum safe distance" and "comfortable, normal distance with no intention to pass" behind the car ahead. The lead car speeds varied from 50 to 100 km/hr. The results showed that under both sets of instructions, drivers adjusted their distance headways in relation to speed, maintaining constant time headways. A significant portion of the drivers maintained time headways that are considered unsafe in relation to drivers' reaction times. There was no significant relationship between the minimal headways maintained by the drivers and their brake reaction times under conditions of maximum attention and preparedness to apply brakes. Accuracy of spoken estimates of headways varied widely among the three measures used to report perceived headway; meters and car lengths yielded much lower estimates (and ones closer to the actual headways) than did seconds. The results have implications for headway perception, driving safety, driver education, and smart cruise-control design.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brookhuis, K. A. , & De Waard, D. (1994). Measuring driving performance by car-following in traffic. Ergonomics, 37, 427–434.

Chen, S. K. (1996). Estimation of car-following safety: Application to the design of intelligent cruise control. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts.

Colbourn, J. C. , Brown, I. D. , & Copeman, A. K. (1978). Drivers' judgments of safe distances in vehicle following. Human Factors, 20, 1–11.

Connell, D. & Joint, M. (1997). Driver aggression. In Aggressive driving: Three studies. Washington, DC: American Automobile Association (AAA) for Traffic Safety.

Dull, E. H. , & Peters H. J. (1978). Collision avoidance system for automobiles (SAE paper 780163). Warrendale, PA: Society for Automotive Engineering.

Evans, L. & Rothery, R. (1976). The influence of forward vision and target size on apparent inter-vehicular spacing. Transportation Science, 10, 85–101.

Evans, L. & Wasielewski, P. (1983). Risky driving related to driver and vehicle characteristics. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 15 2, 121–136.

Harms, P. L. (1966). Driver following studies on the M4 motorway during a holiday and a normal weekend in 1966 (Report No. LR 136). Crowthorne, England: Ministry of Transport, Road Research Laboratory.

Ioannou, P. A. , Chien, C. C. , & Hause, J. (1992). Autonomous intelligent cruise control. In Proceedings of the IVHS America 1992 Annual Meeting (pp. 97–105). Washington, DC: Intelligent Transportation Society of America.

10.

Johansson, G. & Rumar, K. (1971). Drivers' brake reaction times. Human Factors, 13, 23–27.

11.

Jonah, B. A. (1997). Sensation seeking and risky driving: A review and synthesis of the literature. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29 5, 651–665.

12.

Knipling, R. R. , Mironer, M. , Hendricks, D. L. , Tijerina, L. , Everson, J. , Allen, J. C. , & Wilson, C. (1993). Assessment of IVHS countermeasures for collision avoidance: Rear-end crashes (NHTSA Technical Report No. DOT HS 807 995). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

13.

Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437–459.

14.

Leibowitz, H. W. , Guzy, L. T. , Peterson, E. , & Blake, P. T. (1993). Quantitative perceptual estimates: Verbal versus nonverbal retrieval techniques. Perception, 22, 1051–1060.

15.

McKnight, A. J. , & Shinar, D. (1992). Brake reaction time to center high-mounted stop lamps on vans and trucks. Human Factors, 34, 205–213.

16.

Ohta, H. (1993). Individual differences In driving distance headway. In A. G. Gale , I. D. Brown , C. M. Haslegrave , I. Moorhead , and S. P. Taylor (Eds.), Proceedings of Vision in Vehicles (pp. 91–100). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

17.

Ohta, H. (1994). Distance headway behavior between vehicles from the viewpoint of proxemics. IATSS Research, 18, 6–14.

18.

Olson, P. L. , & Sivak, M. (1986). Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards. Human Factors, 28, 91–96.

19.

Rockwell, T. H. (1972). Skills, judgment and information acquisition In driving. In T. W. Forbes (Eds.), Human factors in highway traffic safety research (pp. 133–164). New York: Wiley.

20.

Schweitzer, N. Apter, Y. , Ben-David, G. , Liebermann, D. G. , & Parush, A. (1995). A field study on braking responses during driving. II. Minimum driver braking times. Ergonomics, 38, 1903–1910.

21.

Shinar, D. (1999). Aggressive driving: The contribution of the drivers and the situation. Transportation Research, Part F: Psychology and Behavior, 1, 137–160.

22.

Sivak, M. Post, D. V. , Olson, P. L. , & Donohue, R. J. (1981). Automobile rear lights: Effects of the number, mounting height, and lateral position on reaction times of following drivers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 795–802.

23.

Van Winsum, W. , & Heino, A. (1996). Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking. Ergonomics, 39, 579–592.

24.

Wilde, G. J. S. , Claxton-Oldfield, S. P. , & Platenius, P. H. (1985). Risk homeostasis In an experimental context. In L. Evans & R. C. Schwing (Eds.), Human behavior and traffic safety (pp. 119–143). New York: Plenum.