An experiment was conducted to determine the effects of two types of hearing protectors on auditory localization performance. Six listeners localized a 750--ms broadband noise from loudspeakers ranging in azimuth from -180° to +180° and in elevation from -75° to +90°. Independent variables included the type of hearing protector and the elevation of the source. Dependent measures included azimuth error, elevation error, and the percentage of trials resulting in a frontback confusion. Performance on each of the dependent measures was found to be mediated by one or more of the independent variables. Actual or potential applications include the generation of improved design guidelines for hearing protectors and workplace alarms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel, S. M., & Armstrong, N. M.E (1993). Sound localization with hearing protectors. Journal of Otolaryngology, 22, 357–363.
2.
American National Standards Institute (1989). Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6--1989). New York: Author.
3.
Atherley, G. R. C., & Noble, W. G. (1970). Effect of ear-defenders (ear-muffs) on the localization of sound. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 27, 260–265.
4.
Bolia, R. S., & McKinley, R. L. (2000). The effects of hearing protectors on auditory localization: Evidence from audio-visual target acquisition. InternationalJournal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 6, 309–319.
5.
Ericson, M. A., D'Angelo, W. R., & McKinley, R. L. (1994). Response measures used in free-field localization.. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2897.
6.
Gilkey, R. H., Good, M. D., Ericson, M. A., Brinkman, J., & Stewart, J. M. (1995). A pointing technique for rapidly collecting localization responses in auditory research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 1–11.
7.
Hofman, P. M., Van Riswick, J. G. A., & Van Opstal, A. J. (1998). Relearning sound localization with new ears. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 417–421.
8.
Musicant, A. D., & Butler, R. A. (1984). The influence of pinnaebased spectral cues on sound localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1195–1200.
9.
Musicant, A. D., & Butler, R. A. (1985). Influence of monaural spectral cues on binaural localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 202–208.
10.
Noble, W. G. (1981). Earmuffs, exploratory head movements, and horizontal and vertical sound localization. Journal of Auditory Research, 21, 1–12.
11.
Noble, W. G., & Russell, G. (1972). Theoretical and practical implications of the effects of hearing protection devices on localization ability. Acta Otolaryngologica, 74, 29–36.
12.
Oldfield, S. R., & Parker, S. P. A. (1984a). Acuity of sound localisation: A topography of auditory space: I. Normal hearing conditions. Perception, 13, 581–600.
13.
Oldfield, S. R., & Parker, S. P. A. (1984b). Acuity of sound localisation: A topography of auditory space: II. Pinna cues absent. Perception, 13, 601–617.
14.
Perrett, S. & Noble, W. (1997). The effect of head rotations on vertical plane sound localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2325–2332.
15.
Roffler, S. K., & Butler, R. A. (1968). Factors that influence the localization of sound in the vertical plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 1255–1259.
16.
Russell, G. (1977). Limits to behavioral compensation for auditory localization in earmuff listening conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 219–220.
17.
Slattery, W. H., & Middlebrooks, J. C. (1994). Monaural sound localization: Acute versus chronic unilateral impairment. Hearing Research, 75, 38–46.
18.
Thurlow, W. R., & Runge, P. S. (1967). Effect of induced head movements on localization of direction of sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 42, 480–488.
19.
Vause, N. L., & Grantham, D. W. (1999). Effects of earplugs and protective headgear on auditory localization ability in the horizontal plane. Human Factors, 41, 282–294.
20.
Wightman, F. L., & Kistler, D. J. (1997). Factors affecting the relative salience of sound localization cues. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Wightman, F. L., & Kistler, D. J. (1999). Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2841–2853.
