The ability to localize a virtual sound source in the horizontal plane was evaluated under varying levels of sustained (+Gz) acceleration. Participants were required to judge the locations of spatialized noise bursts in the horizontal plane (elevation 0°) during exposure to 1.0, 1.5, 2.5, 4.0, 5.5, and 7.0 +Gz. The experiment was conducted at the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's Dynamic Environment Simulator, a three-axis centrifuge. No significant increases in localization error were found between 1.0 and 5.5 +Gz; however, a significant increase did occur at the 7.0 +Gz level. In addition, the percentage of front/back confusions did not vary as a function of +Gz level. Collectively, these results indicate that the ability to localize virtual sound sources is well maintained at various levels of sustained acceleration. Actual or potential applications include the incorporation of spatial audio displays into the human-computer interface for vehicles that are operated in acceleration environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American National Standards Institute. (1989). Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1989). New York: American National Standards Institute.
2.
Barer, A. S. & Grishanov, V. E. (1976). Funktsional'noe sostoianie analizatora cheloveka pri uskorenii +Gx [Functional state of the human auditory analyzer following +Gx acceleration]. Kosmicheskaia Biologiia i Aviakosmicheskaia Meditsina [Space Biology and Aerospace Medicine], 10, 41–47. In Russian.
3.
Begault, D. R. (1993). Head-up auditory displays for traffic collision avoidance system advisories: A preliminary investigation. Human Factors, 35, 707–717.
4.
Begault, D. R., & Pittman, M. T. (1996). Three-dimensional audio versus head-down traffic alert and collision avoidance system displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 79–93.
5.
Bolia, R. S., D'Angelo, W. R., & McKinley, R. L. (1999). Aurally aided visual search in three-dimensional space. Human Factors, 41, 664–669.
6.
Bronkhorst, A. W., Veltman, J. A. H., & van Breda, L. (1996). Application of a three-dimensional auditory display in a flight task. Human Factors, 38, 23–33.
7.
Calhoun, G. L., Valencia, G., & Furness, T. A. (1987). Three dimensional auditory cue simulation for crew station design/evaluation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 1398–1402). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
8.
Chambers, R. M. (1963). Operator performance in acceleration environments. In N. M. Burns, R. M. Chambers, & E. Hendler (Eds.), Unusual environments and human behavior (pp. 193–319). London: Free Press of Glencoe.
9.
Doll, T. J. (1986). Synthesis of auditory localization cues for cockpit applications. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 1172–1176). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
10.
Ericson, M. A., D'Angelo, W. R., & McKinley, R. L. (1994). Response measures used in free-field localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2897.
11.
Ericson, M. A., & McKinley, R. L. (1997). The intelligibility of multiple talkers separated spatially in noise. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 593–609). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Furness, T. A. (1986). The supercockpit and its human factors challenges. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 48–52). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13.
Grishanov, V. E. (1976). Issledovanie slukhovoi funktsii pri poperechno napravlennom uskorenii [Study of auditory function following transverse acceleration]. Fiziologiia Cheloveka [Human Physiology], 2, 247–252. In Russian.
14.
Hancock, P. A., & Chignell, M. H. (1988). Adaptive control in human-machine systems. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human factors psychology (pp. 305–345). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15.
Häusler, R., Colburn, S., & Marr, E. (1983). Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing: Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Suppl. 400, 5–62.
16.
Hettinger, L. J., Cress, J. D., Brickman, B. J., & Haas, M. W. (1996). Adaptive interfaces for advanced airborne crew stations. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems (pp. 188–192). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
17.
Hofman, P. M., Van Riswick, J. G. A., & Van Opstal, A. J. (1998). Relearning sound localization with new ears. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 417–421.
18.
Johnson, R. E., Allen, J. R., Schultz, T., Liening, D. A., & Bell, A. F. (1998). The effects of linear acceleration on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human ears. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 69, 40–44.
19.
Kehaïov, A. N. (1978). Prostranstvo, breme, dvizhenie: Bestibularni, zritelnii I slukhovi pertseptsii [Space, time, motion: Vestibular, visual, and auditory perceptions]Sofia, “Medizina i fizkultura” Publishing House. In Bulgarian.
20.
Kehaïov, A. N. (1980). Effets vestibulaires sur les fonctions visuelle et auditive lors de la formation de la perception de l'espace, du temps et du mouvement [Vestibular effects on visual and auditory function during the formation of the perception of space, time, and motion]. Agressologie, 21, 165–169.
21.
King, R. B., & Oldfield, S. R. (1997). The impact of signal bandwidth on auditory localization: Implications for the design of three-dimensional audio displays. Human Factors, 39, 287–295.
22.
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparisons perspectivePacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23.
McKinley, R. L., Ericson, M. A., & D'Angelo, W. R. (1994). 3-dimensional auditory displays: Development, applications, and performance. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, A31–A38.
24.
Mills, A. W. (1958). On the minimum audible angle. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 237–246.
25.
Moroney, B. W., Nelson, W. T., Hettinger, L. J., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Stoffregen, T. A., & Haas, M. W. (1999). An evaluation of unisensory and multisensory adaptive flight path navigation displays: An initial investigation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 71–75). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
26.
Nelson, W. T., Bolia, R. S., Ericson, M. A., & McKinley, R. L. (1998). Monitoring the simultaneous presentation of spatialized speech signals in a virtual acoustic environment. In Proceedings of the 1998 IMAGE Conference, 159–166. Chandler, AZ: The IMAGE Society, Inc.
27.
Nelson, W. T., Bolia, R. S., Ericson, M. A., & McKinley, R. L. (1999). Spatial audio displays for speech communications: A comparison of free-field and virtual acoustic environments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 1202–1205). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
28.
Nelson, W. T., Hettinger, L. J., Cunningham, J. A., Brickman, B. J., Haas, M. W., & McKinley, R. M. (1998). The effects of localized auditory information on visual target detection performance using a helmet-mounted display. Human Factors, 40, 452–460.
29.
Perrott, D. R., Cisneros, J., McKinley, R. L., & D'Angelo, W. R. (1996). Aurally aided visual search under virtual and free-field listening conditions. Human Factors, 38, 702–715.
30.
Ricard, G. L., & Meirs, S. L. (1994). Intelligibility and localization of speech from virtual directions. Human Factors, 36, 120–128.
31.
Slattery, W. H., & Middlebrooks, J. C. (1994). Monaural sound localization: Acute versus chronic unilateral impairment. Hearing Research, 75, 38–46.
32.
Sorkin, R. D., Wightman, F. L., Kistler, D. S., & Elvers, G. C. (1989). An exploratory study of the use of movement-correlated cues in an auditory head-up display. Human Factors, 31, 161–166.
33.
Stinnett, T. A. (1989). Human factors in the super cockpit. In R. Jensen (Ed.), Aviation psychology (pp. 1–37). Brookfield, VT: Gower.
34.
Tannen, R. S., Nelson, W. T., Bolia, R. S., Haas, M. W., Hettinger, L. J., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Stoffregen, T. A., & Hettinger, L. J. (2000). Adaptive integration of head-coupled multi-sensory displays for target localization. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting (Vol. 3, pp. 77–80). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
35.
Valencia, G., Calhoun, G., Ericson, M. A., & Agnew, J. (1990). Localization performance with synthesized directional audio (Technical Report No. AAMRL-TR-90-025). Wright-Patterson Airforce Base, OH: Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
36.
Wenzel, E. M. (1992). Localization in virtual acoustic displays. Presence, 1, 80–106.
37.
Wightman, F. L., & Kistler, D. J. (1989). Headphone simulation of free-field listening II: Psychophysical validation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 868–878.
38.
Wightman, F. L., & Kistler, D. J. (1997). Factors affecting the relative salience of sound localization cues. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39.
Wightman, F. L., & Kistler, D. J. (1999). Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2841–2853
