Haptic Force-Feedback Devices for the Office Computer: Performance and Musculoskeletal Loading Issues

Abstract

Pointing devices, essential input tools for the graphical user interface (GUI) of desktop computers, require precise motor control and dexterity to use. Haptic force-feedback devices provide the human operator with tactile cues, adding the sense of touch to existing visual and auditory interfaces. However, the performance enhancements, comfort, and possible musculoskeletal loading of using a force-feedback device in an office environment are unknown. Hypothesizing that the time to perform a task and the self-reported pain and discomfort of the task improve with the addition of force feedback, 26 people ranging in age from 22 to 44 years performed a point-and-click task 540 times with and without an attractive force field surrounding the desired target. The point-and-click movements were approximately 25% faster with the addition of force feedback (paired t-tests, p < 0.001). Perceived user discomfort and pain, as measured through a questionnaire, were also smaller with the addition of force feedback (p < 0.001). However, this difference decreased as additional distracting force fields were added to the task environment, simulating a more realistic work situation. These results suggest that for a given task, use of a force-feedback device improves performance, and potentially reduces musculoskeletal loading during mouse use. Actual or potential applications of this research include human-computer interface design, specifically that of the pointing device extensively used for the graphical user interface.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Accot, J. , & Zhai, S. (1997). Beyond Fitts' law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 295–302). Atlanta, GA: CHI Publications.

Akamatsu, M. , Sigeru, S. , & MacKenzie, I. S. (1994). Multimodal mouse: A mouse-type device with tactile and force display. Presence, 3(1), 73–80.

Armstrong, T. J. , Martin, B. J. , Franzblau, A. , Rempel, D. M. , & Johnson, P. W. (1995). Mouse input devices and work-related upper limb disorders. In Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Conference on Working With Display Units (375-380). New York: Elsevier.

Barr, A. (1996). Effect of VDT mouse design on task and musculoskeletal performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.

Beaton, R. J. , DeHoff, R. J. , Weiman, N. , & Hildebrandt, P. W. (1987). An evaluation of input devices for 3D computer display workstations. In True 3D imaging techniques and display technologies, SPIE (Vol. 761, pp. 94–101). Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optical Engineering.

Bergqvist, U. , Wolgast, E. , Nilsson, B. , & Voss, M. (1995). Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: Individual, ergonomics, and work organizational factors. Ergonomics, 38, 763–776.

Borg, G. A. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 14(5), 377–381.

Douglas, S. A. , Kirkpatrick, A. E. , & MacKenzie, I. S. (1999). Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 1999 (pp. 215–222). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

Eberhardt, S. , Neverov, M. , West, T. , & Sanders, C. (1997). Force reflection for WIMPs: A button acquisition experiment. In G. Rizzoni (Ed.), Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (pp. 23–28). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

10.

Faucett, J. , & Rempel, D. (1994). VDT-related musculoskeletal symptoms: Interactions between work posture and psychosocial work factors. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 26, 597–612.

11.

Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of human motor systems in controlling the amplitude of a movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

12.

Hasser, C. , & Goldenberg, A. (1998). User performance in a GUI pointing task with a low-cost force-feedback computer mouse. In Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (pp. 151–156). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

13.

Human Factors Society. (1988). American national standard for human factors engineering of visual display terminal workstations (ANSI/HFS 100-1988). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

14.

Johnson, P. W. , Dropkin, J. , Hewes, J. , & Rempel, D. (1993). Office ergonomics: Motion analysis of computer mouse usage. In Proceedings of the American Industrial Hygiene Association Conference and Exposition (pp. 12–13). Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.

15.

Rosenberg, L. (1994). Virtual fixtures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

16.

Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control Cambridge: MIT Press.

17.

Silverstein, B. A. , Fine, L. J. , & Armstrong, T. J. (1986). Handwrist cumulative trauma disorders in industry. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 43, 779–784.

18.

U.S. Department of Labor. (1998). Reports on survey of occupational injuries and illnesses in 1977-1997 Washington, DC: Author.