Retrospective and Prospective Validity of Aircraft Accident Risk Indicators

Abstract

Data from a national survey of pilots were used to examine the validity of measures for the prediction of aviation accidents that had occurred prior to the survey (retrospective analysis) and accidents that occurred after the survey (prospective analysis). Separate retrospective and prospective analyses were conducted, and 45 measures from the survey were found to be associated significantly with accident involvement in the retrospective analysis. However, only 13 of those 45 measures achieved significance in the prospective analysis. Most of the measures found to be significantly related to accident involvement concerned aviation exposure; the remaining measures related to pilots' perceived and actual level of caution. The study is unique in its use of a cohort design for the examination of aircraft accident risk prospectively, and the results suggest the need for caution in the interpretation of retrospective analyses in this research domain. Actual or potential applications of this research include the design of aviation safety programs and the design or interpretation of studies that address indicators of aircraft accident risk.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker, S. P. , & Lamb, M. W. , Li, G.H. , & Dodd, R.S. (1993). Human factors in crashes of commuter airplanes and air taxis. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 64, 63–68.

Booze, C. F. (1977). Epidemiologic investigation of occupation, age, and exposure in general aviation accidents. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 48, 1081–1091.

Harkey, J. A. Y. (1997). Age-related changes in selected status variables in general aviation pilots. Transportation Research Record, 1517, 37–43.

Hunter, D. R. (1995). Airman research questionnaire: Methodology and overall results (Report DOT/FAA/AM-95/27). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

Hunter, D. R. (1997). An evaluation of safety seminars (Report DOT/FAA/AM-97/16). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

Lategola, M. T. , Fiorica, V. , Booze, C. F. , & Folk, E. D. (1970). Comparison of status variables among accident and non-accident airmen from the active airman population (Report AM-70- 18A). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

Li, G. (1994). Pilot-related factors in aircraft crashes: A review of epidemiologic studies. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, 944–952.

Li, G. , & Baker, S. P. (1994). Prior crash and violation records of pilots in commuter and air taxi crashes: A case-control study. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, 979–985.

Lubner, M. E. , Markowitz, J. S. , & Isherwood, D. A. (1991). Rates and risk factors for accidents and incidents versus violations for U.S. airmen. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 231–243.

10.

McFadden, K. L. (1997). Predicting pilot-error incidents of U.S. airline pilots using logistic regression. Applied Ergonomics, 28, 209–212.

11.

O'Hare, D. (1999). Safety is more than accident prevention. In D. O'Hare (Ed.), Human performance in general aviation, 265-290. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.

12.

O'Hare, D. , Chalmers, D. , & Bagnall, P. (1996). A preliminary study of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal injuries in New Zealand aircraft accidents. Final report to the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand Dunedin, New Zealand: Department of Psychology, University of Otago.

13.

Platenius, P. H. , & Wilde, G. J. S. (1989). Personal characteristics related to accident histories of Canadian pilots. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 42–45.

14.

Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

15.

Urban, R. F. (1984). Comparative analysis of social, demographic, and flight-related attributes begween accident and nonaccident general aviation pilots. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 55, 308–312.