Effects of Warning Validity and Proximity on Responses to Warnings

Abstract

The effects of a warning's validity and display characteristics on the responses to binary warnings were studied in a categorization task that resembled the control of a simulated production environment. Students performed a visual signal detection task and were aided by a binary warning indicator. Experimental conditions differed in the validity of the warning and its proximity to the judged stimulus. Participants' performance improved over the course of the experiment, and they partly adjusted their responses to the validity of the warnings but continued to respond to nonvalid warnings throughout the experiment. It was particularly difficult to ignore the nonvalid information when it was integrated with the continuous information. There was evidence for nonoptimal use of the information from the warning system, whether it was valid or not valid. The results indicate a possible distinction between two dimensions of users' trust in warning systems: compliance and reliance. Actual or potential implications of this research include improved warning design based on analysis of system and operator characteristics.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bliss, J. , Gilson, R. , & Deaton, J. (1995). Human probability matching behaviour in response to alarms of varying reliability. Ergonomics, 38, 2300–2313.

Breznitz, S. (1983). Cry-wolf: The psychology of false alarms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Elvers, G. C. , & Elrif, P. (1997). The effects of correlation and response bias in alerted monitor displays. Human Factors, 39, 570–580.

Getty, D. J. , Swets, J. A. , Pickett, R. M. , & Gonthier, D. (1995). System operator response to warnings of danger: A laboratory investigation of the effects of the predictive value of a warning on human response time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 19–33.

Gopher, D. , Itkin-Webman, T. , Erev, I. , Meyer, J. , & Armony, L. (2000). The effect of shared responsibility and competition in perceptual games: A test of a cognitive game-theoretical extension of signal detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 325–341.

Green, D. M. , & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.

Kahneman, D. , & Treisman, A. M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman , R. Davies , & J. Beatty (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29–62). New York: Academic.

Lee, J. D. , & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153–184.

Maltz, M. , & Meyer, J. (2001). Use of warnings in an attentionally demanding detection task. Human Factors, 43, 217–226.

10.

Meyer, J. , & Ballas, E. (1997). A two-detector signal detection analysis of learning to use alarms. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 186–189). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

11.

Montgomery, D. A. (1999). Human sensitivity to variability information in detection decisions. Human Factors, 41, 90–105.

12.

Montgomery, D. A. , & Sorkin, R. D. (1996). Observer sensitivity to element reliability in a multielement visual display. Human Factors, 38, 484–494.

13.

Mosier, K. L. , Skitka, L. J. , Heers, S. , & Burdick, M. D. (1998). Automation bias: Decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 47–63.

14.

Muir, B. M. , & Moray, N. (1996). Trust in automation: Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics, 39, 429–460.

15.

Parasuraman, R. , Molloy, R. , & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency". International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1–23.

16.

Parasuraman, R. , & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, and abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230–253.

17.

Robinson, D. E. , & Sorkin, R. D. (1985). A contingent criterion model of computer-assisted detection. In R. E. Eberts , & C. G. Eberts (Eds.), Trends in ergonomics/human factors II (pp. 75–82). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

18.

Sorkin, R. D. (1988). Why are people turning off our alarms? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 1107–1108.

19.

Sorkin, R. D. , & Woods, D. D. (1985). Systems with human monitors: A signal detection analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 49–75.

20.

Wickens, C. D. , & Andre, A. D. (1990). Proximity compatibility and information display: Effects of color, space and objectness on information integration. Human Factors, 32, 61–78.

21.

Wickens, C. D. , & Carswell, C. M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance for display design. Human Factors, 37, 473–494.