The notion that one can capture some aspect of reality by making a description of it using a symbol ... seems to me a fascinating and powerful idea. But . . . there is a trade-off; any particular representation makes certain information explicit at the expense of information that is pushed into the background and may be quite hard to recover.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bennett, K. B., & Malek, D. A. (2000). Evaluation of alternative waveforms for animated mimic displays. Human Factors, 42, 432–450.
2.
Cleveland, W. S. (1985). The elements of graphing data.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3.
Marr, D. (1982). VisionSan Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
4.
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineeringNew York: Wiley.
5.
Roth, E. M., Mumaw, R. J., & Lewis, P. M. (1994). An empirical investigation of operator performance in cognitively demanding simulated emergencies (NUREG/CR-6208). Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
6.
Roth, E. M., Woods, D. D., & Pople, H. E., Jr. (1992). Cognitive simulation as a tool for cognitive task analysis. Ergonomics, 35, 1163–1198
7.
Vicente, K. J., & Ethier, C. R. (2000). Why fluid dynamics matters for display design in process control: Commentary on Bennett and Malek (this issue). Human Factors, 42, 451–454.
8.
Woods, D. D. (1991). The cognitive engineering of problem representations. In G. R. S. Weir and J. L. Ally (Eds.), Human-computer interaction and complex systems (pp. 169–188. London: Academic.
9.
Woods, D. D. (1995). Towards a theoretical base for representation design in the computer medium: Ecological perception and aiding human cognition. In J. Flach, P. Hancock, J. Caird, & K. Vicente (Eds.) An ecological approach to human-machine systems I: A global perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Zhang, J. & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.
