Overcoming Representational Errors in Complex Environments

Abstract

Errors in situation awareness (SA) can degrade the decision process. One particularly troublesome SA error is the representational error, which reflects problems with the misinterpretation of information based on a person's current mental model of a situation. This study investigates whether the schema-relatedness of information affects the likelihood that a person will fall prey to a representational error. Using a high-fidelity simulation of an air traffic control task, two hypotheses were examined: (a) Schema-bizarre information will affect SA more than schema-irrelevant information, and (b) schema-unexpected information will impact SA more than the absence of schema-expected information. The results supported the first hypothesis but not the second. These results provide an indication of the types of information that affect SA. Enhancing SA by emphasizing the type of information to which an operator is naturally less inclined to respond is one approach to improving system design and thereby performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brewer, W. F. , & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. , & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 119–160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Brewer, W. F. , & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.

Carmino, A. , Idee, E. , Larchier Boulanger, J. , & Morlat, G. (1988). Representational errors: Why some may be termed diabolical. In L. P. Goodstein , H. B. Anderson , & S. E. Olsen (Eds.), Tasks, errors and mental models (pp. 240–250. London: Taylor & Francis.

Connolly, T. (1982). On taking action seriously: Cognitive fixation in behavioral decision theory. In G. R. Ungson & D. N. Braunstein (Eds.), Decision making: An interdisciplinary inquiry (pp. 42–47. Boston: Kent.

DML Software (1997). Major airline disasters. [On-line]. Available: http://dnausers.d-n-a.net/dnetGOjg/Disasters.htm

Endsley, M. R. (1988). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (pp. 789–795). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Endsley, M. R. (1995a). A taxonomy of situation awareness errors. In R. Fuller , N. Johnston , & N. McDonald (Eds.), Human factors in aviation operations (pp. 287–292. Aldershot, England: Avebury Aviation.

Endsley, M. R. (1995b). Towards a theory of situation awareness. Human Factors 37, 32–64.

Fracker, M. L. (1988). A theory of situation assessment: Implications for measuring situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 102–106). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

10.

Jones, D. G. , & Endsley, M. R. (1996). Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 67, 507–512.

11.

Kaempf, G. L. , Klein, G. , Thordsen, M. L. , & Wolf, S. (1996). Decision making in complex naval command-and-control environments. Human Factors, 38, 220–231.

12.

Klein, G. A. (1993a). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein , J. Orasanu , R. Calderwood , & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

13.

Klein, G. A. (1993b). Sources of error in naturalistic decisionmaking tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 368–371). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

14.

Klein, G. A. , & Calderwood, R. (1991). Decision models: Some lessons from the field. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 21, 1018–1026.

15.

Klein, G. A. , & Crandall, B. W. (1995). The role of mental simulation in naturalistic decision making. In P. A. Hancock , J. M. Flach , J. K. Caird , & K. J. Vicente (Eds.), Local applications of the ecology of human-machine systems (Vol. 22, pp. 324–358). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

16.

Lipshitz, R. (1993). Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. In G. A. Klein , J. Orasanu , R. Calderwood , & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 103–137. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

17.

Mandler, J. M. (1979). Categorical and schematic organization in memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 259–299. New York: Academic.

18.

Pezdek, K. , Whetstone, T. , Reynolds, K. , Askari, N. , & Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587–595.

19.

Rouse, W. B. , & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363.

20.

Wilson, J. R. , & Rutherford, A. (1989). Mental models: Theory and application in human factors. Human Factors, 31, 617–634.