Signal detection theory (SDT) assumes a Division of Objective truths of "States of the World" into the nonoverlapping categories of signal and noise. The definition of a signal in many real settings, however, varies with context and over time. In the terminology of fuzzy logic, a real-world signal has a value that falls in a range between unequivocal presence and unequivocal absence. The definition of a response can also be nonbinary. Accordingly the methods of fuzzy logic can be combined with SDT, yielding fuzzy SDT. We describe the basic postulates of fuzzy SDT and provide formulas for fuzzy analysis of detection performance, based on four steps: (a) selection of mapping functions for signal and response; (b) use of mixed-implication functions to assign degrees of membership in hits, false alarms, misses, and correct rejections; (c) computation of fuzzy hit, false alarm, miss, and correct rejection rates; and (d) computation of fuzzy sensitivity and bias measures. Fuzzy SDT can considerably extend the range and utility of SDT by handling the contextual and temporal variability of most real-world signals. Actual or potential applications of fuzzy SDT include evaluation of the performance of human, machine, and human-machine detectors in real systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alliger, G. M., Feinzig, S. L., & Janak, E. A. (1993). Fuzzy sets and personnel selection: Discussion and an application. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 163–169.
2.
Balakrishnan, J. D. (1998). Measures and interpretations of vigilance performance: Evidence against the detection criterion. Human Factors, 40, 601–623.
3.
Baumgartner, R., Winddischberger, C., & Moser, E. (1998). Quantification in functional magnetic resonance imaging: Fuzzy clustering vs. correlational analysis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 16, 115–125.
4.
Bellazzi, R., Silviero, C., Stefanelli, M., & De Nicolao, G. (1995). Adaptive controllers for intelligent monitoring. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 7, 515–540.
5.
Boston, J. R. (1997). Effects of membership function parameters on the performance of a fuzzy signal detector. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 5, 249–255.
6.
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1993). Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development. Psychological Review, 100, 42–67.
7.
Cale, M. L., Paglione, M., Ryan, H., Timoteo, D., & Oaks, R. (1998). User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) conflict prediction accuracy report (Technical Report FAA/CT-TN98/8). Atlantic City, NJ: FAA Technical Center.
8.
Campbell, C. S., & Massaro, D. W. (1997). Perception of visible speech: Influence of spatial quantization. Perception, 26, 627–644.
9.
Craiger, J. P., & Coovert, M. D. (1994). A fuzzy system for mapping worker attributes to tasks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 26107–111.
10.
Egan, J. P., Greenberg, G. Z., & Schulman, A. I. (1961). Interval of time uncertainty in auditory detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 771–778.
11.
Ellison, J. W., & Massaro, D. W. (1997). Featural evaluation, integration, and judgment of facial affect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 213–226.
12.
Farber, E., & Paley, M. (1993, April). Using freeway traffic data to estimate the effectiveness of rear-end collision countermeasures. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual IVHS America Meeting, Washington, DC.
13.
Genaidy, A. M., Karwowski, W., Christensen, D. M., Vogiatzis, C., Deraiseh, N., & Prins, A. (1998). What is heavy?. Ergonomics, 41, 420–432.
14.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966d). Signal detection theory and psychophysics.New York: Wiley.
15.
Hancock, P. A., & Parasuraman, R. (1992). Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle-highway systems. Journal of Safety Research, 23, 181–198.
16.
Heiser, W. J., & Groenen, P. J. F. (1997d). Cluster differences scaling with a within-clusters loss component and a fuzzy successive approximation strategy to avoid local minima.. Psychometrika, 62, 63–83.
17.
Karwowski, W., & Mital, A. (Eds.). (1986d). Applications of fuzzy set theory in human factors.New York: Elsevier.
18.
Klir, G. J., & Yuan, R. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications.New York: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy thinking: The new science of fuzzy logic.New York: Hyperion.
20.
Kosko, B. (1997d). Fuzzy engineering.New York: Prentice-Hall.
21.
Kreifeldt, J. G., & Rao, K. V. N. (1986). Fuzzy sets: An application to warnings and instructions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 1192–1196). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
22.
Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice-reaction times.New York: Academic.
23.
Lehto, M. R., Papastavrou, J. D., & Giffen, W. J. (1998). An empirical study of adaptive warnings: Human- versus computer-adjusted warning thresholds. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2, 19–33.
24.
Lehto, M. R., & Sorock, G. S. (1996). Machine learning of motor vehicle accident categories from narrative data. Methods of Information in Medicine, 35, 309–316.
25.
Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975). Sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika, 40, 77–105.
26.
Lowe, A., Harrison, M. J., & Jones, R. W. (1999). Diagnostic monitoring in anesthesia using fuzzy trend templates for matching temporal patterns. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 16, 183–199.
27.
MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Massaro, D. W. (1988). Ambiguity in perception and experimentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 417–421.
29.
Massaro, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle.Cambridge: MIT Press.
30.
Massaro, D. W., & Friedman, D. (1990). Models of integration given multiple sources of information. Psychological Review, 97, 224–252.
31.
Massaro, D. W., & Hary, J. M. (1986). Addressing issues in letter recognition. Psychological Research, 48, 123–132.
32.
Meng, Q., & Li, Y. (1990). An experiment to introduce set-valued statistics into the evaluation method of the signal detectability theory. [In Chinese]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 22, 16–22.
33.
Moray, N. (1986). Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 42.1–42.29). New York: Wiley.
34.
Moray, N., King, K. R., Turksen, R., & Waterton, K. (1987). A closed-loop model of workload based on a comparison of fuzzy and crisp measurement techniques. Human Factors, 29, 339–348.
35.
Moray, N., Kruschelnicky, E., Eisen, P., Money, L., & Turksen, I. R. (1988). A fuzzy set analysis of skill, rule, and knowledge-based workload. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 164–167). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
36.
Parasuraman, R. (1985). Detection and identification of abnormalities in chest x-rays: Effects of reader skill, disease prevalence, and reporting standards. In R. E. Eberts & C. G. Eberts (Eds.), Trends in ergonomics/human factors II (pp. 59–66). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
37.
Parasuraman, R. (1987). Human-computer monitoring. Human Factors, 29, 695–706.
38.
Parasuraman, R., Hancock, P. A., & Olofinboba, O. (1997). Alarm effectiveness in driver-centered collision-warning systems. Ergonomics, 39, 390–399.
39.
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000d). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 30, 286–297.
40.
Parasuraman, R., & Wisdom, G. (1985). The use of signal detection theory in research on human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (pp. 33–37). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
41.
Peterson, W. W., Birdsall, T. G., & Fox, W. C. (1954). The theory of signal detectability. Transactions of the IRE Professional Group on Information Theory, PGIT-4, 171–212.
42.
Phelps, C. E., & Hutson, A. (1995). Estimating diagnostic test accuracy using a “fuzzy gold standard.”Medical Decision Making, 15, 44–57.
43.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learnin internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Vol. 1. Cambridge: MIT Press.
44.
Sheridan, T. B., & Ferrell, W. (1974). Man-machine systems.Cambridge: MIT Press.
45.
Sorkin, R. D., Kantowitz, B. H., & Kantowitz, S. C. (1988). Likelihood alarm displays. Human Factors, 30, 445–459.
46.
Sorkin, R. D., & Woods, D. (1985). Systems with human monitors: A signal detection analysis. Human-Computer Interaction1, 49–75.
47.
Swets, J. A. (1984). Mathematical models of attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.) Varieties of attention (pp. 183–242. San Diego, CA: Academic.
48.
Swets, J. A. (1996). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49.
Swets, J. A., & Pickett, R. M. (1982). Evaluation of diagnostic systems: Methods from signal detection theory.New York: Academic.
50.
Tanner, W. P., & Birdsall, T. G. (1958). Definitions of d' and η as psychophysical measures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 922–928.
51.
Tanner, W. P., & Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychological Review, 61, 401–409.
52.
Tsoukalas, L. H., & Uhrig, R. E. (1997). Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering.New York: Wiley.
53.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
