There Is More to Monitoring a Nuclear Power Plant than Meets the Eye

Abstract

A fundamental challenge in studying cognitive systems in context is how to move from the specific work setting studied to a more general understanding of distributed cognitive work and how to support it. We present a series of cognitive field studies that illustrate one response to this challenge. Our focus was on how nuclear power plant (NPP) operators monitor plant state during normal operating conditions. We studied operators at two NPPs with different control room interfaces. We identified strong consistencies with respect to factors that made monitoring difficult and the strategies that operators have developed to facilitate monitoring. We found that what makes monitoring difficult is not the need to identify subtle abnormal indications against a quiescent background, but rather the need to identify and pursue relevant findings against a noisy background. Operators devised proactive strategies to make important information more salient or reduce meaningless change, create new information, and off-load some cognitive processing onto the interface. These findings emphasize the active problem-solving nature of monitoring, and highlight the use of strategies for knowledge-driven monitoring and the proactive adaptation of the interface to support monitoring. Potential applications of this research include control room design for process control and alarm systems and user interfaces for complex systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cook, R. I. , & Woods, D. D. (1996). Adapting to new technology in the operating room. Human Factors, 38, 593–613.

De Keyser, V. (1987). Structuring of knowledge of operators in continuous processes: Case study of a continuous casting plant start-up. In J. Rasmussen , J. Leplat , & K. Duncan (Eds.), Human error and new technology (pp. 247–259. London: Wiley.

De Keyser, V. (1990). Why field studies? In M. Helander (Ed.), Human factors in design for manufacturability and process planning (pp. 305–316). Geneva: International Ergonomics Association.

Edwards, E. , & Lees, F. P. (1974). The human operator in process control. London: Taylor & Francis.

Guerlain, S. , & Bullemer, P. (1996). User-initiated notification: A concept for aiding the monitoring activities of process control operators. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 283–287). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Hoffman, R. R. (1987). The problem of extracting knowledge of experts from the perspective of experimental psychology. AI Magazine, 8(2), 53–67.

Hoffman, R. R. (1991). Human factors psychology in the support of forecasting: The design of advanced meteorological workstations. Weather and Forecasting, 6, 98–110.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Jordan, B. , & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103.

10.

Moray, N. (1986). Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. In K. Boff , L. Kaufman , & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance. New York: Wiley.

11.

Mumaw, R. J. , Roth, E. M. , Vicente, K. J. , & Burns, C. M. (1995). Cognitive contributions to operator monitoring during normal operations (Tech. Report AECB-2.376.1). Pittsburgh, PA: Westinghouse Science & Technology Center.

12.

Mumaw, R. J. , Roth, E. M. , Vicente, K. J. , & Burns, C. M. (1996). A model of operator cognition and performance during monitoring in normal operations (Final Report AECB-2.376.3). Pittsburgh, PA: Westinghouse Science & Technology Center.

13.

Nardi, B. A. (1997). The use of ethnographic methods in design and evaluation. In M. Helander , T. K. Landauer , & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 361–366). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

14.

Parasuraman, R. , Molloy, R. , Mouloua, M. , & Hilburn, B. (1996). Monitoring automated systems. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 91–115. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

15.

Patterson, E. S. , & Woods, D. D. (1997). Shift changes, updates, and the on-call model in space shuttle mission control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 243–247). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

16.

Potter, S. S. , Roth, E. M. , Woods, D. D. , & Elm, W. C. (in press). Bootstrapping multiple converging cognitive task analysis techniques for system design. In J. M. C. Schraagen , S. F. Chipman , & V. L. Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive Task Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

17.

Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. New York: North-Holland.

18.

Roth, E. M. , Mumaw, R. J. , & Lewis, P. M. (1994). An empirical investigation of operator performance in cognitively demanding simulated emergencies (NUREG/CR-6208). Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

19.

Sarter, N. (1996). Cockpit automation: From quantity and quality, from individual pilot to multiple agents. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 267–280. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

20.

Seagull, F. J. , & Sanderson, P. M. (1998). Anesthesia alarms in surgical context. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (1048-1052). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

21.

Seminara, J. L. , Gonzalez, W. R. , & Parsons, S. O. (1977). Human factors review of nuclear power plant control room design (EPRI NP-309). Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.

22.

Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

23.

Vicente, K. J. , & Burns, C. M. (1995). A field study of operator cognitive monitoring at Pickering nuclear generating station - B (CEL 95-04). Toronto: University of Toronto, Cognitive Engineering Laboratory.

24.

Vicente, K. J. , & Burns, C. M. (1996). Evidence for direct perception from cognition in the wild. Ecological Psychology, 8, 269–280.

25.

Vicente, K. J. , Moray, N. , Lee, J. D. , Rasmussen, J. , Jones, B. G. , Brock, R. , & Djemil, T. (1996). Evaluation of a Rankine cycle display for nuclear power plant monitoring and diagnosis. Human Factors, 38, 506–521.

26.

Woods, D. D. (1994). Cognitive demands and activities in dynamic fault management: Abductive reasoning and disturbance management. In N. Stanton (Ed.), Human factors in alarm design. London: Taylor & Francis.

27.

Woods, D. D. (1995a). The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics, 38, 2371–2393.

28.

Woods, D. D. (1995b). Process-tracing methods for the study of cognition outside the experimental psychology laboratory. In G. A. Klein , J. Orasanu , R. Calderwood , & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 228–251. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

29.

Woods, D. D. , Wise, J. A. , & Hanes, L. F. (1982). Evaluation of safety parameter display concepts (Final Report NP-2239). Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.