In Russia the paradigm of alcoholism as a disease is still in contrast to the general perception of alcoholics as weak-willed. This article studies alcoholism and recovery in Russia through the case study of the Russian Alcoholics Anonymous online group. It studies how people who are seeking help for their drinking problems in this online community come to incorporate a new self-understanding of being ill with alcoholism.
Design
The data were collected from a Russian online support group for people struggling with alcoholism. The source material consists of 617 posts by more than 35 individuals. The data was analysed with qualitative content analysis using the RQDA software.
Results
The online group acts as a virtual space where people can anonymously talk about alcoholism and engage with AA's 12-Step program. Typically, a new forum member goes through a process of admitting one's problem with alcohol and coming to a new understanding of oneself as a person suffering from a chronic disease. This process includes creating a new relation to alcohol, a new understanding of one's reasons for drinking and a commitment to stay sober and to help others to recover.
Conclusions
The online community creates a space for engagement with AA's 12-Step program and service work of supporting other alcoholics in recovery in the context of Russia, where face-to-face AA groups and other recovery programmes are scarce. When the state cannot deliver the services for problem drinkers or recovering alcoholics, people may turn to the Internet to find alternative information and social support.
ArminenI. (2004). Second stories: The salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous.Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 319–47.
8.
ArroyoJ., MillerW., & ToniganS. (2003). The influence of Hispanic ethnicity on long-term outcome in three alcohol-treatment modalities.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(1), 98–104.
9.
BarakA., Boniel-NissimM., & SulerJ. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups.Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1867–83.
10.
BjerkeT. N. (2006). Cross-cultural gateway to recovery: A qualitative study of recovery experiences in international AA online groups.International Journal of Self Help and Self Care, 5(1), 73–104.
11.
BodinM. (2006). Gender aspects of affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous after treatment.Contemporary Drug Problems, 33(1), 123–141.
12.
BordenA. (2014). The history of gay people in Alcoholics Anonymous: From the beginning.New York & London: Routledge.
CainC. (1991). Personal stories: Identity acquisition and self-understanding in Alcoholics Anonymous.Ethos, 19(2), 210–53.
15.
ChristensenA.-S., & ElmelandK. (2015). Former drinkers' multiple narratives of recovery.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 32(3), 245–257.
16.
CoulsonN. (2014). Sharing, supporting and sobriety: A qualitative analysis of messages posted to alcohol-related online discussion forums in the United Kingdom.Journal of Substance Use, 19(1/2), 176–80.
17.
CritchlowP. (2000). First steps: AA and alcoholism in Russia.Current History, 99, 345–49.
18.
CunninghamJ., van MierloT., & FournierR. (2008). An online support group for problem drinkers: AlcoholHelpCenter.net.Patient Education and Counseling, 70(2), 193–98.
19.
DavisD., & JansenG. (1998). Making meaning of Alcoholics Anonymous for social workers: Myths, metaphors, and realities.Social Work,43(2), 169–182.
20.
DmitrievaE. (2001). The Russian health care experiment: Transition of the health care system and rethinking medical sociology. In CockerhamW. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to medical sociology (pp. 320–333). Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
21.
EkseliusL. (2005). Internet-based self-help for depression: Randomised controlled trial.British Journal of Psychiatry, 187(5), 456–61.
22.
FerriM., AmatoL., & DavoliM. (2006). Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programmes for alcohol dependence.The Cochrane Library.
23.
FinnJ. (1999). An exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability.Health & Social Work, 24(3), 220–232.
24.
GalanterM. (2007). The concept of spirituality in relation to addiction recovery and general psychiatry. In GalanterM. (Ed.), Recent developments in alcoholism: Research on Alcoholics Anonymous and spirituality in addiction recovery (pp. 125–135). New York: Springer.
25.
GalanterM., DermatisH., & SantucciC. (2012). Young people in Alcoholics Anonymous: The role of spiritual orientation and AA member affiliation.Journal of Addictive Diseases, 31(2), 173–182.
26.
GossopM., HarrisJ., BestD. (2003). Is attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous meetings after inpatient treatment related to improved outcomes? A 6-month follow-up study.Alcohol and Alcoholism, 38(5), 421–426.
27.
GrohD. R., JasonL. A., & KeysC. B. (2008). Social network variables in Alcoholics Anonymous: A literature review.Clinical Psychology Review, 28(3), 430–450.
28.
HakerH., LauberC., & RösslerW. (2005). Internet forums: A self-help approach for individuals with schizophrenia?Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112(6), 474–77.
29.
HallM., & TidwellW. (2003). Internet recovery for substance abuse and alcoholism: An exploratory study of service users.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24(2), 161–167.
30.
HowardK., LuegerR., MalingM., & MartinovichZ. (1993). A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 678.
HumphreysK., BlodgettJ., & WagnerT. (2014). Estimating the efficacy of Alcoholics Anonymous without self-selection bias: An instrumental variables re-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 38(11), 2688–2694.
KaskutasL. A., BondJ., & HumphreysK. (2002). Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous.Addiction, 97(7), 891–900.
35.
KaskutasL. A., BondJ., & WeisnerC. (2003). The role of religion, spirituality and Alcoholics Anonymous in sustained sobriety.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly,21(1), 1–16.
36.
KaskutasL. A. (2009). Alcoholics Anonymous effectiveness: Faith meets science.Journal of Addictive Diseases,28(2), 145–157.
37.
KellyJ., & MyersM. (2007). Adolescents' participation in Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous: Review, implications and future directions.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 39(3), 259–269.
38.
KellyJ., MagillM., & StoutR. L. (2009). How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systematic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in Alcoholics Anonymous.Addiction Research & Theory, 17(3), 236–259.
39.
KellyJ., HoeppnerB., StoutR., & PaganoM. (2011a). Determining the relative importance of the mechanisms of behavior change within Alcoholics Anonymous: A multiple mediator analysis.Addiction, 107(2), 289–299.
40.
KellyJ., StoutR., MagillM., & ToniganJ. S. (2011b). The role of Alcoholics Anonymous in mobilizing adaptive social network changes: A prospective lagged mediational analysis.Drug and Alcohol Dependence,114(2), 119–126.
41.
KoposovR., RuchkinV., EisemannM., & SidorovP. (2002). Alcohol use in adolescents from northern Russia: The role of the social context.Alcohol and Alcoholism,37(3), 297–303.
42.
KrentzmanA. R., BrowerK. J., CranfordJ. A., BradleyJ. C., & RobinsonE. A. (2012). Gender and extroversion as moderators of the association between Alcoholics Anonymous and sobriety.Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(1), 44.
43.
LaudetA., MorgenK. & WhiteW. (2006). The role of social supports, spirituality, religiousness, life meaning and affiliation with 12-step fellowships in quality of life satisfaction among individuals in recovery from alcohol and drug problems.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 24(1–2), 33–73.
44.
LevintovaM. (2007). Russian alcohol policy in the making.Alcohol and Alcoholism, 42(5), 500–505.
45.
MackenzieC., GekoskiW. L., & KnoxV. J. (2006). Age, gender, and the underutilization of mental health services: The influence of help-seeking attitudes.Aging & Mental Health, 10(6), 574–582.
46.
McKellarJ., StewartE., & HumphreysK. (2003). Alcoholics Anonymous involvement and positive alcohol-related outcomes: Cause, consequence, or just a correlate? A prospective 2-year study of 2,319 alcohol-dependent men.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,71(2), 302–308.
47.
MoosR., & MoosB. (2006). Participation in treatment and Alcoholics Anonymous: A 16-year follow-up of initially untreated individuals.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(6), 735–750.
48.
MoosR. (2010). Substance use-focused self-help groups: Processes and outcomes. In JohnsonB. (Ed.), Addiction medicine (pp. 925–940). New York: Springer.
49.
MorjariaA., & OrfordJ. (2002). The role of religion and spirituality in recovery from drink problems: A qualitative study of Alcoholics Anonymous members and South Asian men.Addiction Research & Theory, 10(3), 225–256.
MäkeläK., ArminenI., BloomfieldK., Eisenbach-StanglI., BergmanK., & KurubeN. (1996). Alcoholics Anonymous as a mutual-help movement: A study in eight societies.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
52.
NealeJ., AllenD., & CoombesL. (2005). Qualitative research methods within the addictions.Addiction, 100(11), 1584–1593.
53.
NeufeldM., & RehmJ. (2013). Alcohol consumption and mortality in Russia since 2000: Are there any changes following the alcohol policy changes starting in 2006?Alcohol and Alcoholism, 48(2), 222–230.
ObukhovaE. S., & KaravaevaT. A. (2006). Alkogolism is sazavisimost' kak obshchestvennaia problema I obekt vnimaniia pravookhranitelnykh organov.Psikhopedagogika i pravookhranitel'nykh organakh, 27(3), 121–125.
PerronB. (2002). Online support for caregivers of people with a mental illness.Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(1), 70–77.
59.
RaikhelE. (2010). Post-Soviet placebos: Epistemology and authority in Russian treatments for alcoholism.Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 34(1), 132–168.
60.
RaikhelE. (2013). Placebos or prostheses for the will? Trajectories of alcoholism treatment in Russia. In RaikhelE., & GarriotW. (Eds.), Addiction trajectories (pp. 188–212). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
61.
RehmJ. (2014). Russia: Lessons for alcohol epidemiology and alcohol policy.The Lancet, 383(9927), 1440–1442.
62.
RhodesT., & CoomberR. (2010). Qualitative methods and theory in addictions research. In MillerP. G., StrangJ., & MillerP. M. (Eds.), Addiction research methods (pp. 59–78). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
63.
RhodesT., StimsonG., MooreD., & BourgoisP. (2010). Qualitative social research in addictions publishing: Creating an enabling journal environment.The International journal on drug policy,21(6), 441–444.
64.
RiceS., & ToniganJ. S. (2012). Impressions of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) group cohesion: A case for a nonspecific factor predicting later AA attendance.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 30(1), 40–51.
65.
RiessmanF. (1965). The “helper” therapy principle.Social Work, 10(2), 27–32.
66.
Rivkin-FishM. (2005). Women's health in post-Soviet Russia.Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
67.
RolandE. J., & KaskutasL. A. (2002). Alcoholics Anonymous and church involvement as predictors of sobriety among three ethnic treatment populations.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 20(1), 61–77.
68.
RosenqvistP., & Eisenbach-StanglI. (1998). Diversity in nity: Studies of Alcoholics Anonymous in eight societies.Helsinki: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research.
69.
SandersJ. (2011). Feminist perspectives on 12-step recovery: A comparative descriptive analysis of women in Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 29(4), 357–378.
70.
SealeC., ZieblandS., & Charteris-BlackJ. (2006). Gender, cancer experience and Internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups.Social Science & Medicine, 62(10), 2577–2590.
71.
ShinebourneP., & SmithJ. (2009). Alcohol and the self: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of addiction and its impact on the sense of self and identity.Addiction Research & Theory, 17(2), 152–167.
72.
StevensE., & JasonL. (2015). An exploratory investigation of important qualities and characteristics of Alcoholics Anonymous sponsors.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33(4), 367–384.
73.
SussmanS. (2010). A review of Alcoholics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous programs for teens.Evaluation & the Health Professions, 33(1), 26–55.
74.
TomkinsS., SaburovaL., KiryanovN. (2007). Prevalence and socio-economic distribution of hazardous patterns of alcohol drinking: Study of alcohol consumption in men aged 25–54 years in Izhevsk, Russia.Addiction, 102(4), 544–553.
75.
ToniganS., MillerW., & SchermerC. (2002). Atheists, agnostics and Alcoholics Anonymous.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(5), 534–541.
76.
TorbanM., HeimerR., IlyukR., & KrupitskyE. (2011). Practices and attitudes of addiction treatment providers in the Russian Federation.Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy, 2(1), 1–3.
77.
VaillantG. (2005). Alcoholics Anonymous: Cult or cure?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39(6), 431–436.
78.
VaillantG. (2014). Positive emotions and the success of Alcoholics Anonymous.Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly,32(2–3), 214–224.
79.
VanLearA., SheehanM., WithersL., & WalkerR. (2005). AA online: The enactment of supportive computer mediated communication.Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 5–26.
80.
WhiteS. (1996). Russia goes dry: Alcohol, state and society.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WrightK. (1997). Shared ideology in Alcoholics Anonymous: A grounded theory approach.Journal of Health Communication, 2(2), 83–99.
85.
ZaridzeD., BrennanP., BorehamJ. (2009). Alcohol and cause-specific mortality in Russia: A retrospective case–control study of 48 557 adult deaths.The Lancet, 373(9682), 2201–2214.
86.
ZaridzeD., LewingtonS., BorodaA. (2014): Alcohol and mortality in Russia: Prospective observational study of 151 000 adults.The Lancet, 383(9927), 1465–1473.
