BjörkA. (2016). Evidence-based practice behind the scenes: How evidence in social work is used and produced.Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Social Work.
2.
BorrelliB., SepinwallD., ErnstD., BellgA. J., CzajkowskiS., BregerR., …OgedegbeG. (2005). A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 852.
3.
FäldtJ., StorbjörkJ., PalmJ., OscarssonL., & SteniusK. (Eds.). (2007). Vårdkedjeprojektet: Tre utvärderingsperspektiv [Treatment-chain project: Three evaluation perspectives].Stockholm: Statens institutionsstyrelse (SiS).
4.
LongabaughR., DonovanD. M., KarnoM. P., McCradyB. S., MorgensternJ., & ToniganJ. S. (2005). Active ingredients: How and why evidence-based alcohol behavioral treatment interventions work.Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(2), 235–247.
5.
MoosR. H., & FinneyJ. W. (1983). The expanding scope of alcoholism treatment evaluation.American Psychologist, 38(10), 1036.
6.
Project MATCH Research Group. (1998). Matching patients with alcohol disorders to treatments: Clinical implications from project MATCH.Journal of Mental Health, 7(6), 589–602.
7.
SatterfieldJ. M., SpringB., BrownsonR. C., MullenE. J., NewhouseR. P., WalkerB. B., & WhitlockE. P. (2009). Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice.Milbank Quarterly, 87(2), 368–390.
8.
NielsenA., & EllermannA. (2016). Need to know and wish to know: What individuals find important to know about treatment for alcohol problems in order to be able to decide whether to enter or not.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 33(2), 123–138.
9.
StorbjörkJ., ChristophsI., SamuelssonE., & Milander YazdanpanahS. (forthcoming). A study of user involvement in practice in the Swedish addiction treatment system: Methods, participants, and outcomes.Stockholm: Stockholm University, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD).