Two studies investigate the influence of developmental variables on the emergence of persuasion knowledge in children ages three to five years. Theory of mind (a form of social development) consistently explains a significant amount of variance in children's persuasion knowledge. Theory of mind is a well-researched variable in the developmental psychology literature. This form of social development enables a child to understand the mental states of others and to use that mental state understanding to predict others’ future behavior. The results of the current study indicate that before theory-of-mind development, children are unable to recognize persuasion in advertising, most likely because they cannot think about the intentions of the advertiser. The findings are important to the development of child consumer literacy and contribute to the extant literature by demonstrating that developmental factors can explain how persuasion knowledge develops. The authors discuss theoretical, practical, and public policy implications.
ArmstrongGary M., and BrucksMerrie (1988), “Dealing with Children's Advertising: Public Policy Issues and Alternatives,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 7(Spring), 98–113.
2.
Ballard-CampbellMichael (1983), “Children's Understanding of Television Advertising: Behavioral Assessment of Three Developmental Skills,” doctoral dissertation, College of Education, University of California, Los Angeles.
3.
Baron-CohenSimon, LeslieAlan M., and FrithUta (1985), “Does the Autistic Child Have a Theory of Mind?”Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.
4.
BartschKaren, LondonKamala, and CampbellMichelle Diane (2007), “Children's Attention to Beliefs in Interactive Persuasion Tasks,”Developmental Psychology, 43(1), 111–20.
5.
BeverThomas G., SmithMartin L., BengenBarbara, and JohnsonThomas G. (1975), “Young Viewers’ Troubling Response to TV Ads,”Harvard Business Review, 53(November-December), 109–120.
6.
BlosserBetsy J., and RobertsDonald F. (1985), “Age Differences in Children's Perceptions of Message Intent: Responses to TV News, Commercials, Educational Spots, and Public Service Announcements,”Communication Research, 12(October), 455–84.
7.
ButterEliot J., PopovichPaula M., StackhouseRobert H., and GarnerRoger K. (1981), “Discrimination of Television Programs and Commercials by Preschool Children,”Journal of Advertising Research, 21(2), 53–56.
8.
Children's Advertising Review Unit (2009), “Self-Regulatory Program for Children's Advertising,” (accessed July 1, 2009), [available at http://www.caru.org/guidelines/index.aspx].
9.
DenhamSusanne, A. (1986), “Social Cognition, Prosocial Behavior and Emotion in Preschoolers: Contextual Validation,”Child Development, 57(1), 194–201.
10.
DesrochersDebra M., and HoltDebra J. (2007), “Children's Exposure to Television Advertising: Implications for Childhood Obesity,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(Fall), 182–201.
11.
DonohueThomas R., HenkeLucy L., and DonohueWilliam A. (1980), “Do Kids Know What TV Commercials Intend?”Journal of Advertising Research, 20(October), 51–57.
12.
DunnLloyd M., and DunnDouglas M. (2007), Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th ed. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
13.
EagleLynne (2007), “What Does It Do, to Whom—and Does It Matter?”Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 101–110.
14.
Federal Trade Commission (1978), Federal Trade Commission Staff Report on Television Advertising to Children.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
FlavellJohn, H. (1986), “The Development of Children's Knowledge About the Appearance–Reality Distinction,”American Psychologist, 41(4), 418–25.
16.
FriestadMarian, and WrightPeter (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.
17.
GopnikAlison, and AstingtonJanet W. (1988), “Children's Understanding of Representational Change and Its Relation to the Understanding of False Belief and the Appearance–Reality Distinction,”Child Development, 59(1), 26–37.
18.
JohnDeborah Roedder (1999), “Consumer Socialization of Children: A Retrospective Look at Twenty-Five Years of Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26(December), 183–213.
19.
PatrickKelly J. (1974), “The Effects of Cognitive Development on Children's Responses to Television Advertising,”Journal of Business Research, 2(October), 409–419.
20.
KunkelDale (1988), “Children and Host-Selling Television Commercials,”Communication Research, 15(1), 71–92.
21.
KunkelDale, WilcoxBrian L., CantorJoanne, PalmerEdward, LinnSusan, and DowrickPeter (2004), Report of the APA Task Force on Advertising and Children: Psychological Issues in the Increasing Commercialization of Childhood.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
LeekamSusan, R. (1991), “Jokes and Lies: Children's Understanding of Intentional Falsehood,” in Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading, WhitenAndrew, ed. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 159–74.
23.
LempersJacques D., FlavellEleanor R., and FlavellJohn H. (1977), “The Development in Very Young Children of Tacit Knowledge Concerning Visual Perception,”Genetic Psychology Monographs, 95(1), 3–53.
24.
CaroleMacklin M. (1985), “Do Young Children Understand the Selling Intent of Commercials?”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 19(Winter), 293–304.
25.
CaroleMacklin M. (1987), “Preschoolers’ Understanding of the Informational Function of Television Advertising,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(September), 229–39.
26.
McAlisterAnna R., and PetersonCandida C. (2006), “Mental Playmates: Siblings, Executive Functioning and Theory of Mind,”British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 733–51.
27.
MooreElizabeth, S. (2007), “Perspectives on Food Marketing and Childhood Obesity: Introduction to the Special Section,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(Fall), 157–61.
28.
MooreElizabeth S., and RideoutVictoria J. (2007), “The Online Marketing of Food to Children: Is It Just Fun and Games?”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(Fall), 202–220.
29.
MosesLouis J., and BaldwinDare A. (2005), “What Can the Study of Cognitive Development Reveal About Children's Ability to Appreciate and Cope with Advertising?”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(Fall), 186–201.
30.
OzonoffSally, and MillerJudith N. (1995), “Teaching Theory of Mind: A New Approach to Social Skills Training for Individuals with Autism,”Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25(4), 415–33.
31.
PiagetJean (1970), “Piaget's Theory,” in Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology, MussenP.H., ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
RingoldDebra Jones (2005), “Vulnerability in the Marketplace: Concepts, Caveats, and Possible Solutions,”Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 202–214.
33.
RobertsonThomas S., and RossiterJohn R. (1974), “Children and Commercial Persuasion: An Attribution Theory Analysis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 1(June), 13–20.
34.
SodianBeate, TaylorCatherine, HarrisPaul L., and PernerJosef (1991), “Early Deception and the Child's Theory of Mind: False Trails and Genuine Markers,”Child Development, 62(3), 468–83.
35.
WardScott, and WackmanDaniel (1973), “Children's Information Processing of Television Advertising,” in New Models for Mass Communication Research, ClarkeP., ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
36.
WellmanHenry M., CrossDavid, and WatsonJulanne (2001), “Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth About False Belief,”Child Development, 72(3), 655–84.
37.
WellmanHenry M., and LiuDavid (2004), “Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks,”Child Development, 75(2), 523–41.
38.
WellmanHenry M., and WoolleyJacqueline D. (1990), “From Simple Desires to Ordinary Beliefs: The Early Development of Everyday Psychology,”Cognition, 35(3), 245–75.
39.
WrightPeter (2002), “Marketplace Metacognition and Social Intelligence,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(March), 677–82.
40.
WrightPeter, FriestadMarian, and BoushDavid M. (2005), “The Development of Marketplace Persuasion Knowledge in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(Fall), 222–33.
