In this essay, the authors provide a commentary on the American Marketing Association's current definition of marketing. After briefly outlining the evolution of marketing definitions, they challenge several aspects of the most recent definition. In particular, they stress that the new definition may not reflect the expanse of current marketing thought and practice, and they suggest that the limitations in scope and other shortcomings of the definition may have consequences on marketing scholarship, practice, and policy making. Building on these observations, the authors offer several criteria for creating a formal definition of marketing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association (2007), “About APA,” (accessed November 27, 2006), [available at http://www.apa.org].
2.
BartelsRobert (1962), The Development of Marketing Thought.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
3.
BrodbeckMay (1968), Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences.New York: MacMillan.
4.
DwyerF. Robert, PaulH. Schurr, and OhSejo (1987), “Developing Buyer–Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 51 (April), 11–27.
5.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 343–73.
6.
GlazerRashi (1991), “Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset,”Journal of Marketing, 55 (October), 1–19.
7.
HallRobert E., and LiebermanMarc (2001), Economics: Principles and Applications, 2d ed.Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
8.
HuntShelby (1991), Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science.Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing.
9.
KeefeLisa M. (2004), “What Is the Meaning of ‘Marketing'?”Marketing News, (September 15), 17–18.
10.
KohliAjay K., and BernardJ. Jaworski (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (April), 1–18.
11.
KuhnThomas S. (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3d ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
LeeAlfred McClung (1969), Principles of Sociology, 3d ed.New York: Barnes and Noble.
13.
MurrowJim, and MichaelR. Hyman (1994), “Direct Marketing: Passages, Definitions, and Deja Vu,”Journal of Direct Marketing, 3 (Summer), 46–56.
14.
PetersTom (1999), The Brand You 50: Or Fifty Ways to Transform Yourself from an ‘Employee’ into a Brand That Shouts Distinction, Commitment, and Passion!New York: Knopf.
15.
PittLeyland, BerthonPierre, WatsonRick, and GeorgeM. Zinkham (2002), “The Internet and the Birth of Real Consumer Power,”Business Horizons, 45 (4), 7–14.
16.
PlouffeChristopher R., BrianC. Williams, and ThomasW. Leigh (2004), “Who's on First? Stakeholder Differences in Customer Relationship Management and the Elusive Notion of ‘Shared Understanding,'”Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 24 (4), 323–38.
17.
SethiRajesh (2000), “New Product Quality and Product Development Teams,”Journal of Marketing, 64 (April), 1–14.
18.
ShawA.W. (1912), “Some Problems in Market Distribution,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23 (August), 703–765.
19.
SlaterStanley F., and JohnC. Narver (1995), “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (July), 63–74.
20.
ThompsonCraig J., RindfleischAric, and ArselZeynep (2006), “Emotional Branding and the Strategic Value of the Doppelgänger Brand Image,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (January), 50–64.
21.
ToulminStephen (1961), Forsight and Understanding: An Enquiry into the Aims of Science.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
VargoStephen L., and RobertF. Lusch (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 1–17.
23.
WebsterFrederick E. (1992), “The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation,”Journal of Marketing, 56 (October), 1–17.
24.
ZinkhanGeorge M., and HirschheimRudy (1992), “Truth in Marketing Theory and Research: An Alternative Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 56 (April), 80–88.
