AllaisMaurice (1953), “Le comportement de l'homme rationel devant le risque, critique des postulates et axiomes de l'école Americaine,”Econometrica, 21(4), 503–546.
2.
BaronJonathan, and RitovIlana (1994), “Reference Points and Omission Bias,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 475–98.
3.
BauerRaymond A. (1960), “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking,” in Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, RobertS. Hancock, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 389–400.
4.
CamererColin F. (2000), “Prospect Theory in the Wild: Evidence from the Field,” in Choice, Values, and Frames, KahnemanDaniel, and TverskyAmos, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 288–300.
5.
CamererColin F., IssacharoffSamuel, LoewensteinGeorge, O'DonoghueTed, and RabinMatthew (2003), “Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for ‘Asymmetric paternalism,’”University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3), 1211–54.
6.
FinucaneMelissa L., AlhakamiA., SlovicPaul, and JohnsonStephen M. (2000a), “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17.
7.
FinucaneMelissa L., SlovicPaul, MertzC.K., FlynnJames, and SatterfieldTerre A. (2000b), “Gender, Race, and Perceived Risk: The ‘White Male’ Effect,”Health Risk & Society, 2(2), 159–72.
8.
FischhoffBaruch, SlovicPaul, and LichtensteinSarah (1978a), “Fault Trees: Sensitivity of Estimated Failure Probabilities to Problem Representation,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–44.
9.
FischhoffBaruch, SlovicPaul, LichtensteinSarah, ReadStephen, and CombsBarbara (1978b), “How Safe Is Safe Enough: Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits,”Policy Sciences, 9(2), 127–52.
10.
ForgasJoseph P. (1995), “Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (Aim),”Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66.
11.
GrahamJohn D., ThomsonKimberly M., GoldieSue J., Segui-GomezMaria, and WeinsteinMilton C. (1998), “Cost-Effectiveness of Air Bags in Motor Vehicles: Reply,”Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(7), 506–507.
12.
JohnsonEric J., BellmanSteven, and LohseGerald L. (2002), “Defaults, Framing, and Privacy: Why Opting In-Opting Out,”Marketing Letters, 13(1), 5–15.
13.
JohnsonEric J., and GoldsteinDaniel (2003), “Medicine: Do Defaults Save Lives?”Science, 302(5649), 1338–39.
14.
JohnsonEric J., HersheyJohn, MeszarosJacqueline, and KunreutherHoward (1993), “Framing, Probability Distortions, and Insurance Decisions,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7(1), 35–51.
15.
JohnsonEric J., and TverskyAmos (1983), “Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 20–31.
16.
JohnsonEric J., and TverskyAmos (1984), “Representations of Perceptions of Risks,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 55–70.
17.
KahnemanDaniel, and TverskyAmos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica, 47(March), 263–91.
18.
KahnemanDaniel, and TverskyAmos eds. (2000), Choice, Values, and Frames.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
LernerJennifer S., and KeltnerDacher (2001), “Fear, Anger, and Risk,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–59.
20.
LichtensteinSarah, SlovicPaul, FischhoffBaruch, LaymanMark, and CombsBarbara (1978a), “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 551–78.
21.
LichtensteinSarah, SlovicPaul, FischhoffBaruch, LaymanMark, and CombsBarbara (1978b), “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 551–78.
22.
LoewensteinGeorge F., WeberElke U., HseeChristopher K., and WelchNed (2001), “Risk as Feelings,”Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–86.
23.
LuceR. Duncan (2000), Utility for Gains and Losses: Experimental Approaches.New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
MadrianBrigitte C., and SheaDennis F. (2001), “The Power of Suggestion: An Analysis of 401(k) Participation and Saving Behavior,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–87.
25.
PhamMichel T., CohenJoel B., PracejusJohn W., and David HughesG. (2001), “Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 167–88.
26.
ReadDaniel, LoewensteinGeorge, and RabinMatthew (1999), “Choice Bracketing,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1-3), 171–97.
27.
RottenstreichYuval S., and TverskyAmos (1997), “Unpacking, Repacking, and Anchoring: Advances in Support Theory,”Psychological Review, 104(2), 406–415.
28.
RussellJames A. (2003), “Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion,”Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–72.
29.
RussoJ. Edward. and KolzowK.J. (1994), “Where Is the Fault in Fault-Trees,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(1), 17–32.
30.
SamuelsonWilliam, and ZeckhauserRichard (1988), “Status Quo Bias in Decision-Making,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
31.
SavageL.J. (1954), The Foundation of Statistics.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
SlovicPaul, FischhoffBaruch, and LichtensteinSarah (1978), “Accident Probabilities and Seat Belt Usage: A Psychological Perspective,”Accident Analysis and Prevention, 10(2), 281–85.
33.
SlovicPaul, FischhoffBaruch, and LichtensteinSarah (1979), “Rating the Risks,”Environment, 21(3), 14–20.
34.
TetlockPhilip E., and MellersBarbara A. (2002), “The Great Rationality Debate,”Psychological Science, 13(1), 94–99.
35.
ThalerRichard H. (1999), “Mental Accounting Matters,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183–206.
36.
ThalerRichard H., and JohnsonEric J. (1990), “Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice,”Management Science, 36(6), 643–60.
37.
ThalerRichard H., and SunsteinCass R. (2004), “Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron,”University of Chicago Law Review, forthcoming.
38.
TverskyAmos, and KahnemanDaniel (1981), “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,”Science, 211(4481), 453–58.
39.
TverskyAmos, and KahnemanDaniel (1992), “Advances in Prospect-Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.
40.
TverskyAmos, and KoehlerDerek J. (1994), “Support Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective-Probability,”Psychological Review, 101(4), 547–67.
41.
WeberElke U., ShafirSharoni, and BlaisAnn-Renee (2004), “Predicting Risk Sensitivity in Human and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation,”Psychological Review, 111, forthcoming.
42.
WuGeorge, ZhangJiao, and GonzalezRichard (2004), “Decision Under Risk,” in Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, HarveyNigel, and KoehlerDerek, eds. London: Black-well Publishing, forthcoming.