ArthurThomas C. (1994), “The Costly Quest for Perfect Competition: Kodak and Nonstructural Market Power,”New York University Law Review, 69(1), 1–61.
2.
AverittNeil W., and LandeRobert H. (1997), “Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law,”Antitrust Law Journal, 65(3), 713–57.
3.
BagozziRichard P. (1975), “Marketing as Exchange,”Journal of Marketing, 39(October), 32–39.
4.
BakerJonathan B. (1989), “Recent Developments in Economics That Challenge Chicago School Views,”Antitrust Law Journal, 58, 645–55.
5.
BaltoDavid A. (2002), “Recent Legal and Regulatory Developments in Slotting Allowances and Category Management,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 289–94.
6.
BloomPaul N., GundlachGregory T., and CannonJoseph P. (2000), “Slotting Allowances and Fees: Schools of Thought and the Views of Practicing Managers,”Journal of Marketing, 64(April), 92–108.
7.
BorkRobert H. (1993), The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, 2d ed.New York: Basic Books, Inc.
8.
Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (1993), 113 S. Ct. 2578.
9.
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. (1992), 112 S. Ct. 2072.
10.
FoerAlbert A. (2002), “The Third Leg of the Antitrust Stool,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 227–31.
11.
FrazierGary L., and RodyRaymond C. (1991), “The Use of Influence Strategies in Interfirm Relationships in Industrial Product Channels,”Journal of Marketing, 55(January), 52–69.
12.
GaskiJohn F. (1984), “The Theory of Power and Conflict in Channels of Distribution,”Journal of Marketing, 48(Summer), 9–29.
13.
GerlaHarry S. (1985), “The Psychology of Predatory Pricing: Why Predatory Pricing Pays,”Southwestern Law Journal, 39(3), 755–80.
14.
GeyskensInge, SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and KumarNirmalya (1999), “A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(May), 223–38.
15.
GuiltinanJoseph P. (2002), “Choice and Variety in Antitrust Law: A Marketing Perspective,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 260–68.
16.
GundlachGregory T. (2001), “Marketing and Modern Antitrust Thought,” in Handbook of Marketing and Society, PaulN. Bloom, and GundlachGregory T., eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 34–50.
17.
GundlachGregory T., and CadotteErnest R. (1994), “Exchange Interdependence and Interfirm Interaction: Research in a Simulated Channel Setting,”Journal of Marketing Research, 31(November), 516–32.
18.
GundlachGregory T., and PhillipsJoan M. (2002), “Marketing in Antitrust: Contributions and Challenges,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 250–53.
19.
HawkerNorman W. (2002), “The Public Policy of Antitrust and Strategy: An Overview,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 257–59.
20.
HoustonFranklin S., and GassenheimerJule B. (1987), “Marketing and Exchange,”Journal of Marketing, 51(October), 3–18.
21.
HovenkampHerbert (1985), “Antitrust Policy After Chicago,”Michigan Law Review, 84(November), 213–84.
22.
HovenkampHerbert (1999), Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and Its Practice, Hornbook Series. St. Paul, MN: West Group Publishing Co.
23.
JacobsMichael S. (1995), “An Essay on the Normative Foundations of Antitrust Economics,”North Carolina Law Review, 74(1), 219–66.
24.
KaplowLouis (1985), “Extension of Monopoly Power Through Leverage,”Columbia Law Review, 85(3), 515–56.
Ordover JanuszA., and SalonerGarth (1989), “Predation, Monopolization, and Antitrust,” in Handbook of Industrial Organization, SchmalenseeRichard, and WilligRobert D., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 537–96.
27.
PeritzRudolph J.R. (2002), “Antitrust Policy and Aggressive Business Strategy: A Historical Perspective on Understanding Commercial Purposes and Effects,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 237–42.
28.
PettyRoss D. (2002), “Limiting Product Choice: Innovation, Market Evolution, and Antitrust,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, (Fall), 269–74.
29.
PorterRobert H. (1991), “A Review Essay on Handbook of Industrial Organization,”Journal of Economic Literature, 29(June), 553–72.
30.
PosnerRichard A. (1979), “The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis,”University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127, 925–52.
31.
RossStephen (1992), “Post-Chicago Analysis After Kodak: Interview with Professor Steven C. Salop,”Antitrust, (Fall/Winter), 20–22.
32.
ScheffmanDavid T. (1996), “Antitrust, Economics, and ‘Reality,’” in The Economics of the Antitrust Process, MalcolmB. Coate, and KleitAndrew N., eds. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 239–54.
33.
ShenefieldJohn H., and StelzerIrwin M. (2001), The Antitrust Laws: A Primer, 4th ed.Washington, DC: AEI Press.
34.
SullivanE. Thomas, and HarrisonJeffrey L. (1998), Understanding Antitrust and Its Economic Implications, 3d ed.New York: Matthew Bender.
35.
SullivanLawrence A. (1977), “Economics and More Humanistic Disciplines: What are the Sources of Wisdom for Antitrust?”University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 125, 1214–43.
36.
SullivanLawrence A. (1995), “Post-Chicago Economics: Economists, Lawyers, Judges, and Enforcement Officials in a Less Determinate Theoretical World,”Antitrust Law Journal, 63(2), 669–81.
37.
SullivanLawrence A., and GrimesWarren S. (2000), The Law of Antitrust: An Integrated Handbook, Hornbook Series.St. Paul, MN: West Group Publishing Co.
38.
SullivanMary (2002), “The Role of Marketing in Antitrust,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 247–49.
39.
WhiteLawrence J. (2002), “Business School Economics and Antitrust: What's Thought and What's Taught,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 254–56.
40.
WilkieWilliam L., DesrochersDebra M., and GundlachGregory T. (2002), “Marketing Research and Public Policy: The Case of Slotting Fees,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 275–88.