The laws that limit the publication of false but harmful statements about goods, services, or the companies that produce them do not extend to Internet service providers in the same way they do to older media. Companies therefore are vulnerable to negative communication from sources whose anonymity provides the heart of a legal dilemma: freedom of expression and privacy versus the right to damages when libeled. This dilemma leads the authors to suggest public policy and corporate policy remedies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ben Ezra, Weinstein, and Co. Inc. v. America Online Inc. (2000), 206 F.3d 980 (10th Cir.).
2.
BerkeleySimon (2000), “Web Attack,”Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 20.
3.
Blumenthal v. Drudge (1998), 992 F.Supp. 44 (D.D.C.).
4.
ClintonWilliam J. (1997), Presidential Directive on Electronic Commerce, (posted December 17), [available at http://www.ecommerce.gov/presiden.htm].
5.
CryerJohn (1996), “McLibel Internet Site Hit by Thousands Worldwide,”The Tribune [UK], (March 15), 3.
6.
Cubby Inc. v. CompuServe Inc. (1991), 776 F.Supp.135 (S.D.N.Y).
7.
FinnMary Kay, LaheyKaren, and RedleDavid (2000), “Policies Underlying Congressional Approval of Criminal and Civil Immunity for Interactive Computer Service Providers Under Provisions of the Communications Decency Act of 1996: Should E-Buyer Beware?”University of Toledo Law Review, 31(Spring), 347–72.
8.
GelbBetsy D., and HayesLinda (1997), “When Your Competitor Turns Obstructionist,”Business Horizons, 40(March/April), 33–39.
9.
HartmanTodd G. (1999), “The Marketplace vs. The Ideas: The First Amendment Challenges to Internet Commerce,”Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 12(Winter), 419–67.
KoppSteven W., and SuterTracy A. (2000), “Trademark Strategies Online: Implications for Intellectual Property Protection,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 119–31.
12.
New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), 376 U.S. 254.
13.
RaneyRebecca F. (1999), “Incognito Spinmeisters Battle On-line Critics,”New York Times, (October 14), D1, D9.
14.
Restatement (Second) of Torts (1989), §§558–87.
15.
SterlingScott (2001), “Notes and Comment: International Law of Mystery: Holding Internet Service Providers Liable for Defamation and the Need for a Comprehensive International Solution,”Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 21, 327–51.
16.
Stratton Oakmont Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co. (1995), 1995 WL 323710 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. May 24, 1995). Reorg. den'd by 1995 WL 805178 (N.Y.Sup. December 11).
17.
Telecommunications Act (1996), 47 U.S.C. §230 et seq.
18.
Yahoo!, Inc. v. La Ligue Contre le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme (2001), 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18378, 169 F.Supp.2d 1181 (N.D.Cal. November 7).
19.
Zeran v. America Online Inc. (1997), 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir.).
