The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the case of A&M Records v. Napster (2001a) represented a resounding legal victory for the record companies over the largest of the Internet music exchange services. Napster's ultimate survival is uncertain at best, but the key for the record industry is not Napster's eventual life or death per se. Rather, final victory will be determined by whether the music industry can parlay its legal triumph over Napster into any real control of the music piracy that still thrives on the Internet, threatening to alter intellectual property exchange permanently. In this paper, the authors analyze the legal arguments related to Internet digital music transfer and the future of the music industry in light of the current legal and technological environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A&M Records v. Napster (1999), Complaint, C 99-5183 MHP (N.D. Cal.).
2.
A&M Records v. Napster (2000a), 54 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1746.
3.
A&M Records v. Napster (2000b), 55 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1780.
4.
A&M Records v. Napster (2000c), 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18688.
5.
A&M Records v. Napster (2001a), 239 F.3d 1004, 57 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1729.
6.
A&M Records v. Napster (2001b), 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2186.
7.
Audio Home Recording Act (1992), 102 P.L. 563.
8.
BarlowJohn Perry (1994), “The Economy of Ideas: Selling Wine Without Bottles of the Global Net,” (accessed September 13, 2001) [available at www.eff.org/∼barlow/economyofideas.htm].
9.
Bernstein v. J.C. Penney Inc. (1998), 50 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1063.
10.
BrayHiawatha (2001), “Napster Inks Deal with MusicNet,”The Boston Globe, (June 6), C1.
11.
CarothersJo Dale (1998), “Note: Protection of Intellectual Property on the World Wide Web: Is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Sufficient?”Arizona Law Review, 41, 937–84.
12.
CohenAdam (2000), “Taps for Napster,”Time, (July 31), 34–35.
13.
CohenWarren (2000), “Napster's Rap Sheet: Does the Music Mart Rob Artists or Sell Them?”U.S. News and World Report, (May 8), 45–46.
14.
CopleyDevon (2001), “Put a Dime in the Heavenly Jukebox,”Multimedia & Entertainment Law Online News, 7(701), (accessed September 13, 2001) [available at www.ibslaw.com/melon/archive/701_dime.html].
15.
Copyright Act of 1976 (1976), 17 U.S.C. §§101 et seq.
16.
DasSonia (2000), “The Availability of the Fair Use Defense in Music Piracy and Internet Technology,”Federal Communications Law Journal, 52(3), 72–47.
17.
Demetriades v. Kaufmann (1988), 690 F.Supp. 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y.).
18.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1998), 105 P.L. 304.
19.
Fortnightly Corporation v. United Artists Television (1968), 392 U.S. 390.
20.
Gershwin Publishing v. Columbia Artists Management Inc. (1971), 443 F.2d 1159, (2d Cir.).
21.
GilmourDan (2000), “Music Industry Can't Win,”San Jose Mercury News, (July 27), A1.
22.
GoldsteinPaul (1994), Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox.New York: Hill and Wang.
23.
GoldsteinPaul (2000), “The Next Napster May Be an Insider,”New York Times, Op-Ed page, (July 28) (accessed July 28, 2000), [available at www.nytimes.com/00/07/28/oped/28gold.html].
24.
GrafneyBenton J. (2000), “Copyright Statutes That Regulate Technology: A Comparative Analysis of the Audio Home Recording Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act,”Washington Law Review, 75(April), 611–41.
25.
GrazianoMike, and RainieLee (2001), “The Music Downloading Deluge: 37 Million American Adults and Youths Have Retrieved Music Files on the Internet,”Pew Internet Tracking Report, (April 24), 1–8.
26.
HalbertDebora J. (1999), Intellectual Property in the Information Age: The Politics of Expanding Ownership Rights.Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
27.
HillRebecca J. (2000), “Pirates of the 21st Century: The Threat and Promise of Digital Audio Technology on the Internet,”Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Review, 16, 311–43.
28.
HongTheodore (2000), “Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System,” in Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies: International Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, FederrathH., ed. New York: Springer.
29.
Intellectual Reserve Inc. v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry Inc. (1999), 75 F.Supp. 2d 1290.
30.
Iowa State University Research Foundation v. American Broadcasting Company (1980), 621 F.2d 57 (2d Circuit).
31.
Jerome H. Remick & Company v. American Automobile Accessories Company (1925), 5 F.2d 411 (6th Circuit).
32.
KoppSteven W., and SuterTracy A. (1998), “Developments in Copyright Policy and Network Technologies: The First Generation,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(Fall), 303–12.
33.
LangeLarry (1997), “Net Pirates Plunder the High Cs,”Electronic Engineering Times, (July 21), 1–4.
34.
LardnerJames (1987), Fast Forward: Hollywood, the Japanese, and the Onslaught of the VCR.New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
35.
LorenLydia Pallas (2000), “The Changing Nature of Derivative Works in the Face of New Technologies,”Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law, 4(Spring), 57–98.
36.
MAI Systems Corporation v. Peak Computer Inc. (1993), 991 F.2d 511 (9th Circuit).
37.
MannCharles C. (2000), “The Heavenly Jukebox,”The Atlantic Monthly, 286(September), 39–59.
38.
MarkiewiczJennifer E. (1999), “Seeking Shelter from the MP3 Storm: How Far Does the Digital Millenium Copyright Act Online Service Provides Liability Limitation Reach?”Comm-Law Conspectus, 7(Summer), 423–45.
39.
Massey, Bob (2000), “Music Alternatives: File Sharing Beyond Napster,”The Washington Post, (August 11), E11.
40.
McAuliffeMegan, and ManktelowNicole (2000), “DVD Piracy Code Still Online: Aussie Sites Ignore U.S. Court Order Favoring Movie Industry,”ZDNet Australia News, (accessed August 20), [available at www.msnbc.com/news/448215.asp?cp1=1#BODY].
41.
MP3Board Inc. v. Recording Industry Association of America Inc. (2001), Complaint, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6883, (N.D. Cal.).
42.
No Electronic Theft Act (1997), 105 P.L. 147.
43.
Playboy Enterprises Inc. v. Frena (1993), 839 F.Supp. 1552 (M.D. Fla.).
44.
RCA Records v. All-Fast Systems Inc. (1984), 594 F.Supp. 335 (S.D.N.Y.).
45.
Recording Industry Association of America v. Diamond Multimedia Systems Inc. (1999), 180 F.3d 1072 (9th Circuit).
46.
Religious Technology Center v. Netcom Online Communications Services (1995), 907 F.Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal.).
47.
SamuelsonPamela (1999), “Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti-circumvention Regulations Need to Be Revised,”Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14(Spring), 519–66.
48.
Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. H.L. Green Company (1963), 316 F.2d 304 (2d Circuit).
49.
ShayestehShahram (1999), “High Speed Chase on the Information Superhighway: The Evolution of Criminal Liability for Internet Piracy,”Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 33(November), 183–226.
50.
ShirkyClay (2000), “Music Industry Will Miss Napster,”The Wall Street Journal, Opinion, (July 28), A14.
51.
SilvermanDwight (2000), “Music Industry Fans Flames of Dissent,”Houston Chronicle, (August 4), 1.
52.
SkeltonTimothy L. (1998), “Internet Copyright Infringement and Service Providers: The Case for a Negotiated Rulemaking Alternative,”San Diego Law Review, 35(Winter), 219–341.
53.
Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios Inc. (1984), 464 U.S. 417.
54.
Universal City Studios Inc. v. Reimerdes (2000), 111 F.Supp. 2d 294, 55 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1873 (S.D.N.Y.).
