Coca-Cola's practice of cross-couponing violated French competition law. The authors provide a review of U.S. and French competition laws and then compare price discrimination with product-switching explanations for Coca-Cola's cross-couponing practice. The authors argue that cross-couponing is used to entice customers of rival brands to sample the firm's product and is economically efficient.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BelchGeorge E., and BelchMichael A. (1995), Introduction to Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Market Communications Perspective.Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.
2.
BorkRobert (1978), The Antitrust Paradox.New York: Basic Books.
3.
Calais-AuloyJ., BricksH., Calais-AuloyM.T., MauryJ., SteinmetzF., and TempleH. (1981), Consumer Legislation in France.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 63.
4.
Catalina Marketing France (Sté) v. Coca-Cola Beverages (S.A.) (1995), Cour D'Appel D'Aix-en-Provence, 2e ch. (30 Juin).
5.
DerenburgWalter (1955), “The Influence of the French Civil Code on the Modern Law of Unfair Competition,”American Journal of Comparative Law, 4, 1.
The Food Institute Report (1998), “Coupons Rising in Popularity Among Produce Marketers,” 71 (November 16), 1.
9.
The French Government v. Interflora (1993), Conseil de la Concurrence, March 30, Décision No. 93-MC-03, BOCCRF du April 17, 1993, Rec. Lamy, No. 256, Obs. Selinsky.
10.
FriedmanDavid D. (1990), Price Theory.Cincinnati: Southwest Publishing.
11.
GerberDavid J. (1998), Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus.Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
12.
GundlachGregory, and BloomPaul (1998), “Slotting Allowances and the Retail Sale of Alcohol Beverages,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(Fall), 173–84.
13.
JennyFrederic (1996), “French Competition Law Update: 1987–1994,” in 1995 Fordham Corporate Law Institute, BarryE. Hawk, ed. New York: Fordham Corporate Law Institute, 203–32.
14.
KeenMaurice (1968), The Penguin History of Medieval Europe.London: Penguin Books.
15.
LancasterKelvin (1966), “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,”Journal of Political Economy, 74(April), 132–57.
16.
MansfieldEdwin (1985), Microeconomics: Theory and Applications.New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
17.
MauriceS. Charles, and PhillipsOwen R. (1986), Economic Analysis: Theory and Application.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
18.
McLachlanD.L., and SwanD. (1967), Competition Policy in the European Community.London: Oxford University Press.
PR Newswire (1995), “Air France and Pepsi-Cola Sign Global Supply Deal,” (November 16), 11.
22.
S.A. Orangina France v. S.A. Catalina Marketing France et Autre (1997), Cour de Cassation, Com., (18 Novembre).
23.
Santella & Associates (2000a), “NPD Reports Internet Users Are Using Coupons,” (accessed January 11, 2001), [available at www.Santella.com/coupon.htm].
24.
Santella & Associates (2000b), “Studies Indicate Coupons Are an Effective Promotional Tool,” (accessed January 11, 2001), [available at www.Santella.com/coupon.htm].
25.
ShonfieldAndrew (1965), Modern Capitalism.London: Oxford University Press.
26.
Siméon Moquet Borde and Associés (1983), Doing Business in France.New York: Matthew Bender.
27.
StiglerGeorge (1964), “A Theory of Oligopoly,”Journal of Political Economy, 72(1), 44–61.
28.
The Wall Street Journal (1997), “Coca-Cola May Purchase Orangina,” (December 22), B1.
