This research investigates the influence of incomplete typeface logos on consumer perceptions of the firm. In these logos, parts of the characters in the company name are intentionally missing or blanked out, giving rise to a form of perceptual ambiguity. Three studies demonstrate that although incomplete typeface logos have an unfavorable influence on perceived firm trustworthiness, they have a favorable influence on perceived firm innovativeness. The former influence is tied to the logo's perceived clarity, while the latter influence is tied to its perceived interestingness. Furthermore, incomplete typeface logos have an unfavorable influence on overall attitude toward the firm, but only for consumers with a prevention, rather than promotion, focus. These findings suggest that firms should avoid incomplete typeface logos if perceptions of trustworthiness are critical or if consumers are likely to have a prevention focus. However, such logos may be successfully employed with promotion-focused consumers, and they may be used as a tool to position a firm as innovative.
AakerJennifer L. (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(August), 347–56.
2.
BalachanderSubramanian, and GhoseSanjoy (2003), “Reciprocal Spillover Effects: A Strategic Benefit of Brand Extensions,”Journal of Marketing, 67(January), 4–13.
3.
BerlyneDaniel E. (1971), Aesthetics and Psychobiology.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
BerryLeonard L. (1996), “Retailers with a Future,”Marketing Management, 5(Spring), 39–46.
5.
BlochPeter H., BrunelFrédéric F., and ArnoldTodd J. (2003), “Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(March), 551–65.
6.
GornGerald J., JiangYuwei, and JoharGita Venkataramani (2008), “Babyfaces, Trait Inferences, and Company Evaluations in a Public Relations Crisis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 36–49.
7.
HagtvedtHenrik, HagtvedtReidar, and PatrickVanessa M. (2008), “The Perception and Evaluation of Visual Art,”Empirical Studies of the Arts, 26(2), 197–218.
8.
HagtvedtHenrik, and PatrickVanessa M. (2008), “Art Infusion: The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(June), 379–89.
9.
HendersonPamela W., and CoteJoseph A. (1998), “Guidelines for Selecting or Modifying Logos,”Journal of Marketing, 62(April), 14–30.
10.
HendersonPamela W., GieseJoan L., and CoteJoseph A. (2004), “Impression Management Using Typeface Design,”Journal of Marketing, 68(October), 60–72.
11.
HigginsE. Tory (1997), “Beyond Pleasure and Pain,”American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.
12.
HirschmanElizabeth C. (1983), “Aesthetics, Ideologies, and the Limits of the Marketing Concept,”Journal of Marketing, 47(Summer), 45–55.
13.
ImSubin, and JohnP. WorkmanJr. (2004), “Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms,”Journal of Marketing, 68(April), 114–32.
14.
JaniszewskiChris, and MeyvisTom (2001), “Effects of Brand Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing Fluency and Judgment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 18–32.
15.
JoyAnnamma, and SherryJohn F. (2003), “Speaking of Art as Embodied Imagination: A Multisensory Approach to Understanding Aesthetic Experience,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30(September), 259–82.
16.
KellerKevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1–22.
17.
LongGerald M., and ToppinoThomas C. (2004), “Enduring Interest in Perceptual Ambiguity: Alternating Views of Reversible Figures,”Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 748–68.
18.
LurieNicholas H., and MasonCharlotte H. (2007), “Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making,”Journal of Marketing, 71(January), 160–77.
19.
MillerElizabeth G., and KahnBarbara E. (2005), “Shades of Meaning: The Effect of Color and Flavor Names on Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32(June), 86–92.
20.
MorganRobert M., and HuntShelby D. (1994), “The Commitment– Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 58(July), 20–38.
21.
PeracchioLaura A., and Meyers-LevyJoan (1994), “How Ambiguous Cropped Objects in Ad Photos Can Affect Product Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 190–204.
22.
PietersRik, WedelMichel, and BatraRajeev (2010), “The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity,”Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48–60.
23.
PreacherKristopher, AndrewJ., HayesF. (2004), “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models,”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–31.
24.
SawyerJohn E. (1992), “Goal and Process Clarity: Specification of Multiple Constructs of Role Ambiguity and a Structural Equation Model of Their Antecedents and Consequences,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2), 130–41.
25.
SinghJagdip (1993), “Boundary Role Ambiguity: Facets, Determinants, and Impacts,”Journal of Marketing, 57(April), 11–31.
26.
SirdeshmukhDeepak, SinghJagdip, and SabolBarry (2002), “Consumer Trust, Value, and Loyalty in Relational Exchanges,”Journal of Marketing, 66(January), 15–37.
27.
SongHyunjin, and SchwarzNorbert (2008), “If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do,”Psychological Science, 19(10), 986–88.
28.
SorescuAlina B., and SpanjolJelena (2008), “Innovation's Effect on Firm Value and Risk: Insights from Consumer Packaged Goods,”Journal of Marketing, 72(April), 114–32.
29.
Van der LansRalf, CoteJoseph A., ColeCatherine A., LeongSiew Meng, SmidtsAle, HendersonPamela W., BluemelhuberChristian (2009), “Cross-National Logo Evaluation Analysis: An Individual-Level Approach,”Marketing Science, 28(5), 968–85.
30.
VignovicJane A., and ThompsonLori Foster (2010), “Computer-Mediated Cross-Cultural Collaboration: Attributing Communication Errors to the Person Versus the Situation,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 265–76.
31.
WanEcho Wen, HongJiewen, and SternthalBrian (2009), “The Effect of Regulatory Orientation and Decision Strategy on Brand Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(April), 1026–38.
32.
WoodStacey L., and MoreauPage C. (2006), “From Fear to Loathing? How Emotion Influences the Evaluation and Early Use of Innovations,”Journal of Marketing, 70(July), 44–57.
33.
YakovlevaMaria, ReillyRichard R., and WerkoRobert (2004), “Why Do We Trust? Moving Beyond Individual to Dyadic Perceptions,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 79–91.
34.
YiYoujae (1990), “The Effects of Contextual Priming in Print Advertisements,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17(September), 215–22.
35.
ZekiSemir (2001), “Artistic Creativity and the Brain,”Science, 293(5527), 51–52.
